Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hard Evidence Finally Links Saddam Hussein's Iraq to 9/11 - Game. Set. Match.
WSJ, NewsMax, Insight Magazine ^ | 5/27/2004 | SunStar

Posted on 05/27/2004 11:37:06 AM PDT by SunStar

Hard Evidence Finally Links Saddam Hussein's Iraq to 9/11 - Game. Set. Match.



WSJ: Saddam's Files Show 'Direct' 9/11 Link
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/5/27/100047.shtml

Newly uncovered files examined by U.S. military investigators in Baghdad show what is being described as "a direct link" between Saddam Hussein's elite Fedayeen military unit and the terrorist attacks on America on Sept. 11, 2001.

Ahmed Hikmat Shakir, who attended a January 2000 al Qaida summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia where the 9/11 attacks were planned, is listed among the officers on three Fedayeen rosters reviewed by U.S. probers, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

"Our government sources, who have seen translations of the documents, say Shakir is listed with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel," the paper said.

In a post obtained through Saddam's Mukahbarrat intelligence service, Shakir was stationed at the Iraqi embassy in Kuala Lumpur at the time of the 9/11 planning session.



The Link Between Iraq and Al-Qaeda
http://www.insightmag.com/news/477622.html

Senior investigators and analysts in the U.S. government have concluded that Iraq acted as a state sponsor of terrorism against Americans and logistically supported the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States...

Leitner says "Iraq has been in a proxy war against the U.S. for years and has used al-Qaeda in that war against the United States."


OK, Democrats, liberals and leftists worldwide... Time to eat crow once again. (I won't hold my breath.) You probably don't even know about this news story, though it should be the lead story on all American news outlets.

Striking, direct evidence now links Saddam Hussein's Iraq to the September 11, 2001 attacks on the USA. The Wall Street Journal and Newsmax.com are the only one's reporting it. Drudge? Nowhere to be found. AP? Reuters? Please.

Yes, as it turns out, a "Lieutenant-Colonel" in Saddam Hussein's personal military unit, the Fedayeen, was present at the 9/11 planning sessions in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia! You know, the meeting where the only successful attacks on the mainland United States in 150 years was pre-planned by Al Q'aeda terrorists, including Flight 77 hijackers Khalid al Midhar and Nawaz al Hamzi, as well as Ramzi bin al Shibh, the operational planner of the attacks.

Nevermind that Saddam Hussein boasted after the 9/11 attacks about having planned them. Nevermind that he had murals created to commemorate his successful attacks on the United States.

Nevermind that the Czech government confirms to this day that Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligence agents in Prague prior to the 9/11 attacks.

Nevermind that a missing suspect in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing is a former Iraqi soldier who later secured a job at Boston's Logan Airport, where two of the 9-11 hijackers boarded planes they later commandeered and slammed into the World Trade Center.

Nevermind that it was the Fedayeen who setup Salmon Pak, Saddam Hussein's airplane hijacking school located on the outskirts of Baghdad and that a U.S. district court judge in Manhattan ruled in 2002 that Salman Pak played a material role in the devastating Sept. 11 attacks on America.

No, forget about all these "unrelated" and "unproven" allegations against Iraq... Now we have real evidence.

Iraqi agents, working with Al Q'aeda terrorists, attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, killing over 3000 Americans.

Or, maybe not...

-SunStar


TOPICS: War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaedaandiraq; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: plain talk
there's a direct link no one can deny

they will try to deny it and even go out of their way to propagandize that there was no direct link and that the president lied because truth is not important to them
41 posted on 05/27/2004 12:12:24 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
"I knew it did happen before I knew it didn't happen"
~John Kerry
42 posted on 05/27/2004 12:12:45 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cateizgr8

ping!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


43 posted on 05/27/2004 12:13:35 PM PDT by wingnutx (tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: not-alone

As Bush has gone on the record saying that Iraq had "no connection", it is now time that Bush make a speech, make it mandatory that the networks cover it, and announce this connection.

Also for Bush to win the election he should do this.

I doubt that he will though.

Bush doesn't understand the errors he made by not striking back immediately after 9/11 and trying to get international support as his father had.

He also doesn't take serious enough the need to combat the misinformation from the other sides.


44 posted on 05/27/2004 12:14:08 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax

The headline in the NYT would be, "BUSH HIDES EVIDENCE OF SADDAM TERROR LINKS; USES INFO FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES,"


45 posted on 05/27/2004 12:17:08 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
Yet another mural found in Iraq by our troops:


46 posted on 05/27/2004 12:18:08 PM PDT by Quilla (God bless America, President George W. Bush, our brave troops, and Freepers everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9

Would you provide attribution for your quote?


47 posted on 05/27/2004 12:19:04 PM PDT by Chunga (For a good time, call.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
My gut tells me Saddam did both.

Wouldn't it be great if once the Iraqi trial of Saddam begins, he's also indicted in NYC for conspiracy in the 9/11 attacks?!

48 posted on 05/27/2004 12:19:34 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
Haven't you noticed that once Hannity and Rush get their hands on an important piece, slowly but surely, the media falls in line?

Yes, I have noticed. Let's hope they find it before it goes down the memory hole...

49 posted on 05/27/2004 12:20:08 PM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
But he only ATTENDED the meeting, he didn't necessarily take part!

I mean, this is no different than young John F. Kerry attending the meeting at which a call for assassinating Congressmen was issued!
</sarcasm>

50 posted on 05/27/2004 12:23:36 PM PDT by Redbob (still hoping for the "self-illuminating glass-bottomed parking lot" solution to the Iraq problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Correct. And he can also talk about the communications intercept the British made immediately after 9/11 that pointed directly to North Korea providing uranium to Libya, with a stop-off in Pakistan for enhancing to weapons grade, and the Iraqi scientists working on the "Muslim Bomb" project in Libya.


51 posted on 05/27/2004 12:25:16 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

Bimp!


52 posted on 05/27/2004 12:25:21 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Either Saddam laundered 9/11 thru Al Qaida or at a minimum provided airplane hijacking training. Either way, there's a direct link no one can deny.

Can you say "Salman Pak?" And who is the nameless international terrorist, known only as "The Ghost," who was running it? Hmmm, I think Fat Ted the Traitorous Murderer is going to need a couple bottles of Chivas tonight in order to forget he ever saw this information!

Henry Lee II
"Leftists are crazed and violent people,
With the blood of millions on their hands.”

53 posted on 05/27/2004 12:26:39 PM PDT by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
A "bimp"? Did you say "bimp"?
That ees not a "bimp" -
THIS ees a

BIMP!
</Clouseau>
</humor>

54 posted on 05/27/2004 12:27:26 PM PDT by Redbob (still hoping for the "self-illuminating glass-bottomed parking lot" solution to the Iraq problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
Isn't that just amazing... I've never seen a political party want power so bad that they honestly and truely are willing to sacrifice our nation to obtain it. The lies that spew forth from their "possessed" beings.</>

You should have studied "The Peloponnesian War" when you were in High School. "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it". It was dems (demagogues) the too.

55 posted on 05/27/2004 12:29:07 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
Isn't that just amazing... I've never seen a political party want power so bad that they honestly and truely are willing to sacrifice our nation to obtain it. The lies that spew forth from their "possessed" beings.</>

You should have studied "The Peloponnesian War" when you were in High School. "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it". It was dems (demagogues) then too.

56 posted on 05/27/2004 12:29:22 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Dis your dig bit?


57 posted on 05/27/2004 12:31:42 PM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Ah am Inspector Closeau of the Surete and ah have hit a bimp in the road. May ah use your fune?


58 posted on 05/27/2004 12:32:49 PM PDT by beelzepug (I'll take "Why Me?" for a thousand, Alex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

The real question I have is. . .why has the administration been so adamant in dismissing that Saddam had a direct connection to the 9/11 attacks? Even more important, why has the administration been so adamant in dismissing that Saddam had ANY connection, however tangential, to the 9/11 attacks?


59 posted on 05/27/2004 12:33:06 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
...no...

...arrchamp...

That's nit mi deg.

60 posted on 05/27/2004 12:34:29 PM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson