Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First full day of testimony in Laci Peterson murder case
WHNT19.com ^ | 6/2004

Posted on 06/03/2004 5:50:30 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-480 next last
To: pinz-n-needlez
Here's a bit about the spa owner's testimony and Geragos' stupendous crossexam that skewered the police:

>>Buer, a prosecution witness on the second day of testimony in Scott Peterson’s murder trial, also said a Modesto police detective inaccurately indicated in a report that she stopped work at a volunteer search center for Laci Peterson because she found Scott Peterson’s behavior unusual.

“I did not make that statement,” Buer said. She later clarified that she had never gone to the volunteer search center, but had felt uncomfortable around three of Laci Peterson’s friends because she felt the women strongly backed Scott Peterson shortly after his wife was reported missing.>>

from the Modbee: http://www.modbee.com/reports/peterson/trial/story/8658770p-9532200c.html

So while the actual quote was imprecise, the sentiment was accurate as reported by the police, it would seem.

Pinz
421 posted on 06/03/2004 9:40:38 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

I'm not surprised you thought of that right off, you're always quick!

Vel made that point, too.

So, when are we gonna find out: 1) Are we correct in assuming that Martha's show aired from 9-10 a.m. Modesto time as of Dec., 2002; 2)At what exact time was "meringue" mentioned in the show of Dec. 24th? 3)Did this mention of meringue occur after 9:30?

We already know that Scott has committed himself to his story of having left home at 9:30.

If this pans out, to me, the very best part of it will be the irony--in that Geragos was reportedly SO smug about pointing to the mention of meringue in the DEC. 24TH show. And this same info, which he is currently gloating over, will then come back to haunt him. I hope!


422 posted on 06/03/2004 9:40:50 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Except for some sloppy rope tying there is no innocent explanation for losing that many anchors.
423 posted on 06/03/2004 9:41:04 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

... and, in fairness to California, the jury that finally did convict the Menendez murderers was ALSO a California jury!


424 posted on 06/03/2004 9:42:44 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: Rusty Roberts

Yes, given the prominence of cement and the bottom of the Bay in this case, I always like it when people say such-and-such piece of evidence will "sink him like a stone"!


425 posted on 06/03/2004 9:44:20 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane; Canadian Outrage

CO says she thinks the scarf that went with Laci's last outfit will figure in this case; not sure how.

As for shooting her, I agree that if he'd done it in the house, they'd have found some trace.

BUT he may have done it on the way to the Bay... out in the country, late at night? One bullet to the head from a .22 pistol?

I know of one case in which a woman committed suicide with some pistol, I think it was a small caliber. She shot herself in the chest, not the head, true, but there was so little blood apparent at the scene that the first person to find her didn't know at first glance that she had shot herself!


426 posted on 06/03/2004 9:47:33 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse

Thanks!

Nite all!


427 posted on 06/03/2004 9:48:44 PM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

THAT'S encouraging to hear!


428 posted on 06/03/2004 9:48:45 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator

Is there any chance that all of the Peterson junk can be delegated to the 'The Smokey Backroom' section? This crap may last more than six months...


429 posted on 06/03/2004 9:52:20 PM PDT by Libloather (VRWC - we know who we are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick

REf: the families entering the courtroom! The Petersons are a sick bunch, they all need to be locked up in a rubber room. They think they're at a picnic! I hope the DA wipes those sickening smiles off their faces at the end of the trial~! They make me SICK~!!


430 posted on 06/03/2004 10:21:46 PM PDT by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: spectre
But first, the Judge needs to ban them for a few days. They are clearly trying to influence the jury, IMHO. What about the GAG order, aren't the Petersons violating it everytime they go on tv & say that snotty is innocent???
431 posted on 06/03/2004 10:24:57 PM PDT by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Positive
also seem to recall that the Peterson and Rocha families were quite close before the Amber appearance. I don't think it was ever said they were "quite close" I think they were on speaking terms as any inlaws would be, but you can clearly see they are not compatible as friends under any circumstances~! Plus, they are the ones making the snide remarks, you don't hear Sharon Rocha acting like a low class citizen, she has shown nothing but CLASS in a horrible situation. I'm sure there are times she'd like to scream & yell about this whole situation, especially when she sees the Petersons laughing in court. They have not made it easy for the Rochas by any means!
432 posted on 06/03/2004 10:32:05 PM PDT by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You mean like the Threat Matrix threads?


433 posted on 06/03/2004 10:37:17 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
I'm retired and I watch cable news most of the day. I can't get away from Scott Peterson on cable. Do we really need to waste FR bandwidth on this case? Or Michael Jackson? Geeeeeesh!

It is NEWS and if you don't like reading about it, skip this thread, also I would assume you have a remote to change channels, there are many other shows on cable to watch if you prefer something else. Do you have a daughter?

434 posted on 06/03/2004 10:40:34 PM PDT by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Sorry I didn't get back to you with an answer, but I see rb provided a much more detailed piece of info than I would ever be able to provide.


435 posted on 06/03/2004 11:01:58 PM PDT by Diver Dave (Stay Prayed Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
his new cable tv show called something like "Mysteries from the case files of Henry Lee"

What I wanna know is -- will there be subtitles?

436 posted on 06/04/2004 12:48:48 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: MHT

Perhaps he had already taken Laci to the warehouse in the tarp before it was light?


437 posted on 06/04/2004 12:52:57 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Don't ever get between Dr. Lee and a camera--"hazardous to healt'".

"When you alone and no forensic case you can alway go...
Tee Vee...
When you got worry all dat noise and dee hurry dere's alway a show...
Tee Vee...
Just listen to my accent as I talk about duh spattr...
Linguh on yoh couches my voice really seem to mattuh...
I nevuh lose...
De lights so much brightuh dere...
I fohget all my English but nobody care...
I go on Tee Vee, no finuh place foh me...
Tee Vee, Where evee one watchee me..."

438 posted on 06/04/2004 1:04:49 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse

I had not known that her cell was not working. The message goes into a voicemail place "out there" at her cell phone co. She could even have retrieved it from any phone. But if her cell wasn't working, WHY would she retrieve that message, since her husband KNEW her cell wasn't working and she wouldn't be expecting a call from him there.


439 posted on 06/04/2004 1:07:18 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

CO, so you mean that the prosecution didn't go out with their big guns in opening statements because they have things they will "spring" on the defense? I hope so, but is that even allowed?


440 posted on 06/04/2004 1:10:08 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-480 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson