Skip to comments.
Feinstein Planning to Offer Semi-auto Ban as an Amendment Soon
Gun Owners of America ^
| June 02, 2004
| NA
Posted on 06/04/2004 2:21:55 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
06/04/2004 2:21:57 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: *bang_list
2
posted on
06/04/2004 2:23:08 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Someone explain to me how this will affect criminals and not law abiding people? Seems to me the only affect such bills will have is on the decent people while gangs won't give up firepower.
To: neverdem
In the unlikely and unthinkable event that the Dims regain control on the Hill or somehow lie, cheat or steal the presidency, I think I am going to seriously shop for an Independence Day gift for myself. Something in .40 or 9mm... I fear the day when our 2nd amendment rights are taken from us and freedom becomes a memory.
4
posted on
06/04/2004 2:39:27 AM PDT
by
Knute
To: The Bandit
Someone explain to me how this will affect criminals and not law abiding people? Seems to me the only affect such bills will have is on the decent people while gangs won't give up firepower. Better still, someone force Feinstein to explain why SHE thinks she's entitled to carry a concealed firearm while she goes out of her way to deny law-abiding American citizens their Second Amendment rights.
5
posted on
06/04/2004 3:13:48 AM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(John Kerry is a butthead! ...or worse, a used car salesman.)
To: The Bandit
re: explain to me how this will affect criminals
There is a low (IIRC 3% national or state) percentage of "assault weapons" that are used in crimes.
6
posted on
06/04/2004 3:15:00 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
To: neverdem
Does this mean that Feinstein would give up her pistol permits and weapons?
Oh yes, I thought not.
Regards,
7
posted on
06/04/2004 3:16:34 AM PDT
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: The Bandit
Someone explain to me how this will affect criminals and not law abiding people? Seems to me the only affect such bills will have is on the decent people while gangs won't give up firepower.
Don't just preach to the choir. Communicate with your elected crooks to help torpedo her nonsense if you have not already.
To: neverdem
To: Knute
If you worry about that I suggest something in 7.62 Nato.
- bump -
Sent Emails to both of my Senators.
It is so easy to do - just click the link.
11
posted on
06/04/2004 4:20:52 AM PDT
by
DefCon
To: Knute
"I fear the day when our 2nd amendment rights are taken from us and freedom becomes a memory."
It is just the prospect of such a day arriving that the 2nd Amendment was enacted in the first place. The 2nd Amendment is freedom's teeth, as George Washington said. When that day arrives, true patriots will show the tyrants just what the 2nd Amendment is all about.
To: Prime Choice
"Better still, someone force Feinstein to explain why SHE thinks she's entitled to carry a concealed firearm while she goes out of her way to deny law-abiding American citizens their Second Amendment rights."
Well, her life is so much more valuable than ours, don'cha know.
To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee; Squantos
It's important to make those phone calls.
14
posted on
06/04/2004 5:06:35 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
15
posted on
06/04/2004 5:09:08 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: neverdem
This guy needed 2nd amendment rights.
I hear that this man was arrested and killed by the state.
Contact Senator Feinstein
Can you own a gun in England?
Mayor Dianne Feinstein welcomes the Queen of England to San Franscisco.
(1983)
To: neverdem
Fienswine will attache this amendment to every piece of legislation that she can during the next several months. The anti-gunners simply do not want accept a defeat because they know that their precious "assault weapon ban" is a worthless, useless piece of legislation designed to get people used to banning guns based solely on cosmetics.
17
posted on
06/04/2004 5:34:54 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: DefCon; #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; 2nd amendment mama; 2Trievers; AGBRUHN; always vigilant; ...
It is so easy to do Amen to that...bump this to the top and keep it going!!! CT Freepers...send these letters to our oh-so-wonderful /sarcasm Senators in DC. It's bad enough in CT as is, we don't need to give these guys another Federal ban with which to choke off our own rights here in our home state.
To: neverdem
Is the article referring to the AWB? some new version of the AWB? or some new piece of crap outlawing all semi-automatic pistols, rifles and shotguns?
Pratt could try to be more clear in his announcements.
19
posted on
06/04/2004 5:53:04 AM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: neverdem
Oh boy;
is it ever depressing to be offered a quick means to 'alert your Senators..." about some piece of legislation when the legislation belongs to "your" senator.
Somehow, I don't think that "Dianne, please don't do it" would work.
20
posted on
06/04/2004 6:04:12 AM PDT
by
norton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson