You must be kidding me ... better respect Khalid Sheikh Mohhamad (sp) medical privacy
1 posted on
06/09/2004 8:47:12 PM PDT by
cohokie
To: cohokie
I'm really getting sick of the left.
2 posted on
06/09/2004 8:50:19 PM PDT by
samtheman
(www.georgewbush.com)
To: cohokie
Those clowns have gone stark raving mad!!!!!
They are more concerned about the privacy of the terrorist medical records than their own safety. God help us!!! excuse me.. God help them.
3 posted on
06/09/2004 8:53:39 PM PDT by
blastdad51
(Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
To: cohokie
Where do they think they are, Palm Beach County? </sarcasm>
4 posted on
06/09/2004 8:58:37 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Ronald Wilson Reagan (1911-2004))
To: cohokie
Dasboot's wife's astute observation:
If they didn't request or subpoena the medical records, the lefties would be accusing the FedGuv of neglecting the detainees medical needs...in violation of this or that international standard.
5 posted on
06/09/2004 8:59:22 PM PDT by
dasboot
(<img src="XXX">)
To: cohokie
Oh please... these bozos in the press don't have a story here.
6 posted on
06/09/2004 9:01:08 PM PDT by
demlosers
To: cohokie
Oh, the horror!.......undies on the head, and now THIS!
And all those poor little detainees want to do is
annihilate every american man, woman and child.....
7 posted on
06/09/2004 9:03:48 PM PDT by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: cohokie
Under the Geneva Convention, a illegal combatant is specifically designated as an individual that is not entitled to POW rights and is also defined as an individual that can be executed simply for being an illegal combatant.
Where is the Geneva Convention clause that says anything about an illegal combatant's "medical privacy"?
8 posted on
06/09/2004 9:05:22 PM PDT by
Polybius
To: cohokie
Another attempt to create a scandal - they wait till the 3rd paragraph to say:
"There is no universally established international law governing medical confidentiality. But ethics experts said international medical standards bar sharing such information with interrogators to ensure it is not used to pressure prisoners to talk by withholding medicine or by using personal information to torment a detainee. "
In other words - no harm no foul, but it just bothers us enough to try to milk another week out of the prison scandal.
It just bothers them that we have anyone in custody at all. If Osama were in custody they would want him let out.
DKK
9 posted on
06/09/2004 9:10:08 PM PDT by
LifeTrek
To: cohokie
There is no universally established international law governing medical confidentiality. But ethics experts said international medical standards bar sharing such information with interrogators <clearing throat>
This is war, Queens-bury rules do not apply
Methinks the writer need to be re-assigned to the tea & crumpets beat!
12 posted on
06/09/2004 9:42:55 PM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(Kerry{D-Hanoi} will graff post-Vietnam policy on Iraq: Exit & let the Syrian Baathists take over)
To: cohokie
I couldn't continue reading the article.
I had to go look for something to sponge off the crocodile tears pouring down my cheeks.
Boo Hoo Hooo.....
14 posted on
06/09/2004 11:33:50 PM PDT by
John Valentine
("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson