[tpaine]

I'll worry about Bush once an identical version gets passed by the House. If it does, then Bush has to figure how many single issue voters won't vote for him because he signs it. I'll say he grows in office, and he changes his mind. We'll see.

I 'worry' about a man that lets his politics define his principles about out RKBA's. -- To me our RKBA's is an inalienable right, not to be infringed for ANY reason.
--- Obviously, Bush differs, as do you.
- To me, this is a direct violation of the oath of office, -- to protect & defend our Constitutional rights. It is as far from 'single issue politics' as you can get.

Have you ever pledged to 'protect & defend', neverdem?

[neverdem]

--- Obviously, Bush differs, as do you.

Kindly, speak for yourself, not me.

[neverdem]

Have you ever pledged to 'protect & defend', neverdem?

I missed that question when first you made it. Yes, I did, more than a few times, just shy of nine years active duty and about five and a half active reserve. With all this crap about a living Constitution, Supreme Court Justices citing foreign law, general ignorance about guns and the Constitutional recognition of a natural right to self-defense, I'm not going to cut my nose to spite my face by voting for a third party or not voting for president. Unless you're ready to apply rule 308, don't waste the keystrokes. I have also taken the Hippocratic Oath. I only consider such options as that rule in extremis.