Skip to comments.
UKIP set to grab 20% in Euro poll (REJECTING THE EU UPDATE)
The Sunday Times ^
| June 13, 2004
| David Cracknell and David Smith
Posted on 06/13/2004 3:41:09 AM PDT by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
1
posted on
06/13/2004 3:41:10 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: Denver Ditdat; Judith Anne; Desdemona; alnick; knews_hound; faithincowboys; hillary's_fat_a**; ...
2
posted on
06/13/2004 3:41:30 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: MadIvan
The UKIP has recently won the support of Robert Kilroy-Silk and Joan Collins. And Simon Cowell, too, I understand (from The Telegraph).
3
posted on
06/13/2004 3:45:06 AM PDT
by
BlessedBeGod
('I went to Vietnam, yada yada yada, I want to be President...")
To: MadIvan
The article should say England, not Britain. Ukip has had no success in Scotland.
To: Carcharodon
The UKIP needs to hit Scotland harder in my opinion - the SNP is the most pro-European party in the EU. That's a vulnerability it has yet to exploit - that Nationalists will sell Scotland up the river to Brussels, whereas the UKIP won't.
Regards, Ivan
5
posted on
06/13/2004 3:47:14 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: MadIvan
Of course the EU Socialists will claim Bush has used the Dangerous American Brain Ray Machine on innocent Britains!
6
posted on
06/13/2004 3:47:44 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: Dallas59
Of course the EU Socialists will claim Bush has used the Dangerous American Brain Ray Machine on innocent Britains! And me without my tin foil beanie. :)
Regards, Ivan
7
posted on
06/13/2004 3:48:44 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: MadIvan
The SNP are actually rather anti Europe, especially in regards to the Common Fisheries Policy. They did have a vision of becoming independent and scumming off loadsafunds like the Irish did but see now that's a non-starter.
Anyway, Kilroy-Silk would be beaten senseless if he appeared up ae Glesgae strits.
To: MadIvan
Interesting how a true multi-party system makes as few as 20% of voters a powerful bloc who have a voice in guiding their nation.
9
posted on
06/13/2004 3:52:48 AM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(06/07/04 - 1000 days since 09/11/01)
To: Carcharodon
The last I heard Alex Salmond speak (and yes, I know he's no longer leader), he was sounding like he was negotiating the terms of surrender to Brussels. In any event, I doubt the SNP is going to take quite the stand the UKIP would - that is definitely a difference.
And I agree, there needs to be a Scottish representative of the UKIP campaigning in Scotland.
Regards, Ivan
10
posted on
06/13/2004 3:53:49 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: Straight Vermonter
The UK used to be a two party system...we appear to be breaking out of that by stages. It is fair to say, and the newspapers have repeated it
ad nauseam, that we are a 3 party system (Labour, Tories, Lib Dems). I see no particular harm in this. Let's have a system by which we are not bound by Eeny or Meeny - let's have genuine ideological differences and a competition of ideas.
Regards, Ivan
11
posted on
06/13/2004 3:55:58 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: MadIvan
The Scottish people are very well aware of the pro - Europe stance of the SNP. The Scottish people are generally much more pro EU than the English
12
posted on
06/13/2004 3:57:44 AM PDT
by
weegie
To: MadIvan; KangarooJacqui; Piefloater; Atlantic Friend; Michael81Dus; ItsonlikeDonkeyKong
Most Europeans I know, including some Irish, are saying that the EU is a great idea and will just make everything easier. When I reveal my apprehension about loss of sovereignty they thumb their noses and say that I'm talking about Empire. It isn't all about convenience, though, is it? There are serious problems with the constitution, centralizing of authority, loss of true independence, and a homogenizing of culture coming with the EU. I'm interesting to hear your thoughts, MI. And it's great to see you back online. FR is all the better with you participating.
13
posted on
06/13/2004 4:19:03 AM PDT
by
risk
("They're casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society." --MT)
To: MadIvan
Remember Ivan, that here in the US our political views are extremely polarized - basically you're either "with us or against us" - with the Democrats being against all that our nation was founded upon.
Also, since we aren't a Parliamentary system, having to form coalitions in order to secure the top leadership position is unheard of here. Until this election, I too thought of Britain as having two parties: Labour and Torie. I'd hate to see your system there devolve into one such as Russia's with so many parties that keeping track of them would be a full time job.
We all wish you the best of luck at staying out of the damned EU - by fully assimilating into that one world government test, your nation will learn what our founders meant about "taxation without representation". Likewise they'll understand why America chose revolution over the King's rule.
14
posted on
06/13/2004 4:25:04 AM PDT
by
datura
(Battlefield justice is what our enemies deserve. If you win, you live. If you lose, you die.)
To: MadIvan
If they are unable to report poll results, how is it that they are allowed to report 'forecasts'.....or are they like our own media?
15
posted on
06/13/2004 4:31:00 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(LOSERS quit when they are tired/WINNERS quit when they have won)
To: OldFriend
If they are unable to report poll results, how is it that they are allowed to report 'forecasts'.....or are they like our own media? Perhaps it's like a line from the Bard, "a custom more honoured in the breach than the observance." ;)
Regards, Ivan
16
posted on
06/13/2004 4:32:20 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: MadIvan
The last I heard Alex Salmond speak (and yes, I know he's no longer leader), he was sounding like he was negotiating the terms of surrender to Brussels.
Why would anyone surrender to Brussels?
To: risk
Most Europeans I know, including some Irish, are saying that the EU is a great idea and will just make everything easier. When I reveal my apprehension about loss of sovereignty they thumb their noses and say that I'm talking about Empire. It isn't all about convenience, though, is it?
That's a little backwards isn't it.
To: Desdemona
Why would anyone surrender to Brussels? Salmond thinks Scotland will get loads of money in terms of EU structural funds.
Regards, Ivan
19
posted on
06/13/2004 4:44:15 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
To: MadIvan
Salmond thinks Scotland will get loads of money in terms of EU structural funds.
And The Hague is jut going to send cash? Be realistic about who's running the show over there and hope everyone survives when the next European ground war starts.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson