Posted on 06/13/2004 8:29:53 AM PDT by doug from upland
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Did Freepers Kill Nick Berg?
Why We're Not Ruling It Out
By Tamara Baker
May 12, 2004
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From her post:
PS from Tamara: A word of profuse thanks to Fintan Dunne of BreakForNews.com, who originally broke this story. And "congratulations" to FreeRepublic's Doug from Upland for failing to cover his cybertracks by posting an edited, falsified "enemies list" to FreeRepublic.
Tamara Baker of St. Paul, Minnesota, it is time to take back your words from the above citation.
For the record, although the communists of A.N.S.W.E.R. shortened the list of signers on their website after the murder of Nick Berg by the IFTs (Islamo Fascist Terrorists), the name Michael Berg was indeed on the original list.
When that list was posted, it came directly from the source code on that page. I simply pulled the code, cut and pasted it, and added my commentary.Until the murder of his son, I had never heard of the name Michael Berg. It was merely one name on a huge list.
Tamara, you and some of the fringe left are free to create conspiracies. Sometimes they are actually mildly humorous. Some on the right have their own conspiracies. Some right wing zealots actually believe that Bill Clinton deceived a survivor of the Bataan death march, that he tried to fix a federal trial and deny a woman her day in court, that Bernie Schwartz gave 900K to the DNC to keep from being indicted for selling missile technology to the Chinese communists, that Clinton actually committed perjury and had his right to practice before the Supreme Court yanked, that Hillary hid billing records under subpoena until the statue of limitations had run, that a dead body was found by a canon in a park, that Al Gore took money from Buddhists in their place of worship, and that a troubled young intern is telling the truth about late night phone sex on an unsecured phone line with the president.
A background check would reveal that I have no ties to the FBI, NSC, or CIA. When a FReeper posts on FR, I don't suspect that any of those agencies is looking for their next marching orders from us. They are not waiting for Doug from Upland to tell them what to do. I do correctly believe, however, that government officials are watching the A.N.S.W.E.R. website. After all, that is one of the places they will find the names of America's enemies while we are at war for survival of Western Civilization.
Tamara, continue writing from your perspective as I will from mine. It would be helpful to your credibilty, whatever that may be among the fringe left, if you actually did a little fact checking as you do spell checking.
A.N.S.W.E.R. knows the answer. Perhaps you need to ask them why they edited their original list after Berg's murder. Dear, the "congratulations" belongs to them, not to me.
FReepers, Tamara is free to continue to believe the conspiracy. What are the chances, however, that she will actually correct the lie that I posted "an edited, falsified "enemies list". Should we have a betting pool and a friendly little wager? (Whoops, there I go again. Doug from Upland is publicly calling for the destruction of poor and minority families by encouraging gambling online.)
If he is going to plant WMDs, they must be Iraqi WMDs. If Iraq doesn't have them, how did he get them to plant?
Tamara Baker. Today half-Baked....
Timeline! We don't care about no stinkin' timeline!
pay her no more heed, she's a silly c***.
Can you get it on The Wayback Time Machine?
http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
Wow! I always wanted to be in the Mossad!
The left wallows in lies. They have no honor or shame so there will never be an apology. It would mean nothing coming from one of them anyway.
BobJ -- you are probably right about just ignoring her. A FReeper let me know what she wrote and I thought she needed to be called on it. She is welcome to have fun with her conspiracy theory. I enjoy satire. I don't really expect her change anything even if truth stares her in the face. Remember, she is part of that group who saw no problem with a rapist sitting in the White House.
As long as one dismisses the meaning of editing.
What is described is copying, not editing.
bump
Thanks for the link but no thanks. Her little site or to whomever it belongs will get no hits from me. My priorities today are writing an addendum to a proposal for a building in New York and seeing how my business associate is doing in Baghdad.
Well, you were right. She didnt make a correction. She's still lying.
Thanks for the report. When you have a hero who is a perjurer, multiple sexual assaulter, obstructor of justice, intimidator of witnesses, military loather, sale of missile technology to the ChiComs approver, Oval Office defiler, etc., it is probably easy to convince yourself you are not lying. The spinning and self-denial by the lunatic left is something at which we can marvel and mock. They are funny when they are out of power and dangerous when they are in power. Let's keep them funny.
Falsified enemies list. The lie has not been corrected. Her head is still deeply embedded you know where.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.