Row over Kidman's film romp with youngster

Digitalspy ^ | 06/13/04 | Neil Wilkes

[Pikamax]

Row over Kidman's film romp with youngster 10:31 BST, Sunday 13th June 2004 -- by Neil Wilkes Nicole Kidman has been caught up in a row over a new film which features her kissing a ten-year-old boy while naked.

In the movie, called Birth, Kidman plays a widow who believes the boy to be a reincarnation of her husband.

Two scenes in particular have come under fire; in both, Kidman and the boy - Canadian child actor Cameron Bright - are "completely naked and caressing each other." In one of them, there is a close-up of " a very passionate kiss" as they sit in the bathtub together.

"The last thing on earth Nicole needs is a movie which is going to be jumped on by sickos and used in some perverse way to promote paedophilia," a source told the Daily Star Sunday today. "But truth is, the publicity department is already describing the movie as a nightmare. The producers, director and Nicole herself are likely to face a lot of flack."

It will cost film studo New Line around $50 million if they decide to axe the movie altoegther.

[Tijeras_Slim]

Are they sure it wasn't Tom Cruise's stunt-double?

[independentmind]

Two scenes in particular have come under fire; in both, Kidman and the boy - Canadian child actor Cameron Bright - are "completely naked and caressing each other." In one of them, there is a close-up of " a very passionate kiss" as they sit in the bathtub together.

Bright's parents should be charged with child abuse.

[Lazamataz]

I used to resist the notion that the liberal left's goal is to allow sex with minors.

I'm starting to question that resistance.

[cmsgop]

Jeez, Just when I thought I saw it all,.....

Who reads the script and goes ,Yeah I'll do that scene!

[Crazieman]

*cough*
ACLU defense of NAMBLA

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

I don't understand the fuss here. This is nothing but art.

Now if Kidman was having sex with a guy her age who's married to her character in the movie, there'd be outrage.

[IronJack]

No doubt there's some "artistic" reason for the cut-rate porno.

[annyokie]

Shades of that crappy movie of the 80's "Luna."

[putupjob]

It sounds like this is pornography with a minor.
Total swill and more support for all the Nambla lovers.

[Steely Tom]

I'm sure she did this because her career is going so incredibly well.

(steely)

[goldstategop]

Pedophilia chic. At least its a woman. If it were a guy, they'd already be calling for him to be strung up from the nearest lamppost. <sarcasm

[tet68]

Maybe they'd let me take his place?

[The Mayor]

"But truth is, the publicity department is already describing the movie as a nightmare.

I'd say

[Bluntpoint]

During a private screening, Tom and his date comptiplated what this would do to for Nicole's film career.

[sinkspur]

I used to think Cruise was the nutty one in that marriage, what with his weird Scientology.

But, the more I observe and listen to Kidman, it's apparent that they're both a bit unhinged.

[lady lawyer]

Of course that's their goal. Scenes like these are intended to desensitize people to the idea. Pedophiles are beginning to publish articles in "scientific" journals, claiming that pedophilic attractions are healthy. They are attempting to remove pedophilia from the list of mental disorders -- like they did with homosexuality a couple of decades ago. They are constantly pushing to declare "reproductive rights" and "sexual rights" for minors, while pushing to weaken parental rights, and lower or eliminate age of consent laws.

[haywoodwebb]

Funny!

[lady lawyer]

PS. The constant push to protect people based on "sexual orientation" would protect pedophiles, too. "Sexual orientation" is an unlimited term.

[Lazamataz]

Just in case I didn't ask you yet, marry me.

My goal is to ask every Freeperette.