Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China told to use nukes if Taiwan hits dam
The Straits Times ^ | June 18, 2004 | Guo Shiping

Posted on 06/18/2004 7:07:34 PM PDT by bunkerhill7

China told to use nukes if Taiwan hits dam

Some parliamentary delegates call on Beijing to retract its no-first-use pledge to deter 'terrorist acts' like dam strike

By Guo Shiping

SHENZHEN - China should withdraw its undertaking on no first-use of nuclear weapons should Taiwan try to blow up the Three Gorges Dam, according to some parliamentary delegates.

The call was made by them - as well as some who sit on the country's top political advisory body - in the wake of a recent US Defence Department report which suggested that Taiwan could target the dam in a pre-emptive strike.

That study sparked off a public debate in Taiwan on developing a military offensive strategy.

In response, delegates to China's National People's Congress (NPC), the de facto parliament, and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) wrote to the central government in Beijing, calling for it to revise its no-first-use pledge on nuclear weapons.

Their argument is that the undertaking needs to be changed now that the country is facing hostile forces planning attacks against its densely populated regions and the dam, the world's biggest hydroelectric project.

They feel that such strikes should be viewed as terrorist attacks and that China should use nuclear weapons as a deterrence.

On their side are some American think-tank scholars who have expressed strong objections to any Taiwanese attempt to blow up the dam.

They believe such an attack will bring destruction to Taiwan itself.

The NPC and CPPCC delegates also want Beijing to freeze Taiwanese businessman Hsu Wen-long's assets in China to punish him for his support of Taiwanese independence.

After China's Taiwan Affairs Office and the official People's Daily singled him out for criticism, Chinese websites were inundated with calls for economic sanctions against the Taiwanese tycoon.

The cyber-postings urged the Chinese people to boycott the products of Mr Hsu's Chi Mei Group and not to work for his companies.

Such calls have been growing in intensity within China, which explains why many NPC and CPPCC delegates scrambled to ask for his assets in China to be frozen.

Some analysts in Beijing argue that the delegates' request is totally reasonable given that Mr Hsu has committed treason and is determined to split the country.

In the United States, they note, the authorities have the right to freeze the assets of anyone guilty of instigating secession.

To the suggestion that the Taiwanese businessman merely gave vocal support, the delegates' counter was that he had gone beyond words.

During critical junctures in Taiwan's 2000 presidential election, he declared openly that Mr Chen Shui-bian was the only person who could truly carry out 'Lee Teng-hui's line' and he played a role in helping Mr Chen win the support of Taiwanese voters.

The delegates also said the Taiwanese tycoon had long been bankrolling President Chen's pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party, something Mr Hsu himself never denied.

According to reliable sources in Beijing, China will be taking a carrot-and-stick approach in its future dealings with Taiwanese businessmen.

Chinese officials in charge of Taiwan affairs said that Taiwanese investors' support for independence, or the lack of it, would determine how China would treat them.

Those who back independence can expect the stick; those who do not will be welcomed warmly.

In fact, for the latter group, China will soon be offering more benefits, including tax and land-price concessions, special protection even if cross-strait ties worsen, and appointment as advisers on Taiwan affairs to help China keep abreast of developments there.

The writer is a professor of economics at Shenzhen University in China.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; nukes; taiwan; threegorgesdam
Dambusters
1 posted on 06/18/2004 7:07:37 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Dumb-busters


2 posted on 06/18/2004 7:11:11 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
I really doubt that Taiwan would destroy a dam "preemptively".

Now if the Reds invade then that's another story.

And would the Reds nuke Taiwan? I don't think so - they need it a a prosperous province ala Hong Kong in order to pay for the perennial failure of socialism.
3 posted on 06/18/2004 7:18:05 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
There is no reason for Taiwan to make any "preemptive strike on the Three Gorges Dam." It will be a few years yet before the lake behind that dam is full. Then, if the dam is breahed, the center of China will be washed away with deaths of up to 100 million people and incalcuable property damage.

So, the proper approach of the Taiwanese should be to "hold the Dam hostage." Taiwan should announce in public that in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan, it will blow the Dam. The same principles of destruction apply there as in the Ruhr Valley in Germany, shown in the WW II movie, "Dambusters." China will be yanked back from the status of a developing nation to a third-world nation in a week, if that Dam is blown. China should not be so stupid as to risk that result.

John / Billybob

4 posted on 06/18/2004 7:22:21 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Sounds like sombody is feeling just a teeny weeny bit vulnerable! :)


5 posted on 06/18/2004 7:47:44 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

I'm sure Taiwan is getting ready to take on Mainland China. WTF?!?!?!?


6 posted on 06/18/2004 7:49:35 PM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I wonder how many møøselimbs are in on the design or construction.

Hmmmm. A dam with a built in bomb...


7 posted on 06/18/2004 7:53:04 PM PDT by null and void ( 'IF', only the middle letters in 'life.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
I don't get it. Why would Taiwan strike the dam "preemptively"? What would it preempt? Not a war: attacking China would undoubtedly precipitate one. Moreover, China's ability to attack Taiwan doesn't directly depend on the dam.

The only reason Taiwan would have for attacking the dam would be as revenge for an invasion from the mainland...but retribution is the logical opposite of preemption. Color me confused.

8 posted on 06/18/2004 7:54:01 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
The real reason is to make it known that they (Reds) will militarily react if SOMETHING happens to the dam.

Then when the reds want a defensible reason to attack Taiwan, they blow up their "under construction" dam and then can tell the world that it was "self defense"

First you set the domino's up ...
9 posted on 06/18/2004 8:11:57 PM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (I think James Brown said it best, "Shabbbbab-brezeee, nahn, uuhhh, Can't hep myseff.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
There's been a lot written about the viability, or lack thereof, of such a large damn being built upon fault ridden earth. It would be so Chinese if they had as a contingency plan to use a failure as an excuse to invade Taiwan blaming it on their sabotage. Even if they lose they win...as far as they are concerned.

LBT

-=-=-
10 posted on 06/18/2004 8:13:22 PM PDT by LiberalBassTurds (Even now in heaven there are angels carrying savage weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
The only reason Taiwan would have for attacking the dam would be as revenge for an invasion from the mainland...but retribution is the logical opposite of preemption. Color me confused.

Two possibilities....Mainland setting up an excuse for any future dam failure. They ALWAYS turn national attention outward when they have internal troubles.

More likely, the Taiwanese send a less than subtle warning that, though they couldn't defeat China militarily, they can make some big trouble. A deterrent of sorts.
11 posted on 06/18/2004 8:17:56 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
The Three Gorges Dam is known to be falling apart by itself, which leads to wonder if it will be a pretext to war.
12 posted on 06/18/2004 8:22:11 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy
You are right on target. If the dam breaks loose, the Communists save face by claiming Taiwan, when really is was poor construction.
13 posted on 06/18/2004 8:25:13 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
U.S.China told to use nukes if Islamo-fascist terror teams Taiwan hit twin towers.dam.

There that's better.

14 posted on 06/18/2004 8:31:10 PM PDT by this_ol_patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
in the wake of a recent US Defence Department report which suggested that Taiwan could target the dam in a pre-emptive strike.

?? Why would we tell the commies about this? Somehow I think this article is not talking about the Taiwanese government but perhaps Al Qaida-style terrorists who live in Taiwan, perhaps? This story is confusing.

15 posted on 06/18/2004 8:35:55 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
In the United States, they note, the authorities have the right to freeze the assets of anyone guilty of instigating secession.

Funny how they turn to imagined American statutes to justify their pretensions. This is a magnificent capitulation to America's historical victory.

Tiananmen, anywone?

(Oh, and Mao was a great lover of the Declaration of Independence.)

16 posted on 06/18/2004 8:49:37 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

Wasn't there something a few years ago about them declaring a certain carrier a strategic asset, saying that if it were attacked they would be justified in using the nuclear option? (or was that some book I read...). Seems mighty convenient...


17 posted on 06/18/2004 9:13:35 PM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

Good point.


18 posted on 06/19/2004 8:19:43 AM PDT by null and void ( 'IF', only the middle letters in 'life.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Taiwan does not have to blow up the 3G's Dam. China has done such a half-ass job of building it that it may take care of itself.


19 posted on 06/19/2004 9:14:22 AM PDT by Dr. Marten (I donated to the Democratic Party today, but I forgot to flush it down the toilet....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson