To: genefromjersey
Consider the implications of that for a moment-then consider the implications of doing the same thing to humans !Does Bill Clinton count as human?
2 posted on
06/19/2004 7:30:12 AM PDT by
Redcoat LI
(You Can Trust Me , I'm Not Like The Others.....)
To: genefromjersey
NOW has no authority to make anything mandatory.
3 posted on
06/19/2004 7:31:15 AM PDT by
Clara Lou
To: genefromjersey
I think this has already been done. God did this a long time ago, but man has followed other directions.
4 posted on
06/19/2004 7:32:55 AM PDT by
TommyDale
To: genefromjersey
"How long do you think it will take before NOW makes such a gene transplant mandatory for men??"
make it mandatory for women too.
5 posted on
06/19/2004 7:34:25 AM PDT by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: genefromjersey
NOW's reaction is going to depend on whether the therapy works on lesbians.
To: genefromjersey
>Emory University's National Primate Research Center have been doing genetics experiments on meadow voles (whatever they are)
To: genefromjersey
A "Cure" for Promiscuity ??
Lorena Bobbit.
9 posted on
06/19/2004 7:38:00 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: genefromjersey
"How long do you think it will take before NOW makes such a gene transplant mandatory for men??"
NOT SOON ENOUGH. ;)
To: genefromjersey
|
|
|
How's this for a cure? |
12 posted on
06/19/2004 7:56:29 AM PDT by
Fintan
(Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car.)
To: genefromjersey
NOW (National Organization of Women) has NEVER advocated monogamy. I rather suspect they will shortly demand an expansion of the research so the gene for monogamy can be REMOVED!
Remember, it's hard to tell the difference between a NOW member and your typical neighborhood hooker.
13 posted on
06/19/2004 7:59:05 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: genefromjersey
If monogamy is so good, why doesn't NOW support it already?
14 posted on
06/19/2004 8:01:14 AM PDT by
Mr Ramsbotham
("This house is sho' gone crazy!")
To: genefromjersey
15 posted on
06/19/2004 8:12:55 AM PDT by
Servant of the 9
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: genefromjersey
Oh, MAN!!! The second the 'endangered species' people see that the meadow voles aren't cross-pollinating like they're supposed to, they'll have them on the endangered list.
16 posted on
06/19/2004 8:50:35 AM PDT by
Maria S
("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."George W. Bush 1/20/01)
To: genefromjersey
transferring a single gene - the vasopressin receptor- into the brain of a normally
promiscuous vole will make the critter monogamous.
I wonder if any of the scientists involved will have the cojones to give the gene one
of those cutesy names, like the PW gene.
But probably all the researchers involved are female, gay or of
ambiguous sex-identity.
17 posted on
06/19/2004 8:53:28 AM PDT by
VOA
To: genefromjersey
What makes you think NOW values monogamy?
They don't even like marriage, and aren't too fond of women being involved with men at all, let alone long term.
24 posted on
06/19/2004 10:12:28 AM PDT by
sharktrager
(George Clooney has rubber nipples.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
