Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush leads in North Carolina media poll [47-42]
The State ^ | 6/22/04 | N/A

Posted on 06/22/2004 5:02:50 AM PDT by BlackRazor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Littlejon
MY personal opinion is that people, especially those in the South, can see through a snake oil salesman like Edwards.

From what I've seen, snake oil salesmen like Clinton and Edwards do very well in the South.

21 posted on 06/22/2004 8:40:39 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: codercpc

"What is the accuracy of polls that use these over polling of one group or the other?"

I have no idea. The poll may be accurate, but this is just a snapshot of mid june. In four months the mood may well change. History has shown that things will improve for Bush, the question is, is this the groundbreaking year or not.


22 posted on 06/22/2004 8:59:25 AM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor

Did this poll include the dead people, who seem to vote democrat enmasse?


23 posted on 06/22/2004 12:08:53 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Let Kerry be Kerry -what the hell else is he good for? -but let Bush be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

I'm no eye doctor, Johnny Z, but from your view of snake oil salesmen in relation to many of my southern brothers and sisters-I declare you to have twenty-twenty vision.


24 posted on 06/22/2004 12:16:00 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Let Kerry be Kerry -what the hell else is he good for? -but let Bush be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

poll ping


25 posted on 06/22/2004 1:38:02 PM PDT by marblehead17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor; Dales
Here's a poll from Jun 2000 that basically ended up mimicking the final NC results. FWIW. :-)
26 posted on 06/22/2004 3:06:18 PM PDT by Coop (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor


This poll was conducted by Research 2000, and they were very accurate in 2000.. among the best. I think it's close to being accurate..

Mason-Dixon had Bush by 7 in a mid-May poll., Mason-Dixon was also very accurate in 2000.

Two of the best polling services from 2000, have similar results, I think we need to accept them as fact, unless you want to keep your head in the clouds and only accept good news and ignore bad.


Research 2000, 6/13-6/16, Bush 47-42.
Mason-Dixon, 5/14-5/17, Bush 48-41.

I would put Bush's North Carolina lead at 6.


27 posted on 06/24/2004 6:15:13 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
I think we need to accept them as fact, unless you want to keep your head in the clouds and only accept good news and ignore bad.

Please cite where I have kept my "head in the clouds" and only accepted good news while ignoring bad. I think most people who read my posts on a regular basis would vouch for my objectivity in interpreting poll results, and say that I probably lean a bit to the more cautious side.

28 posted on 06/24/2004 7:34:13 AM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor


Sorry.. My post wasn't directed towards you. I replied to the main post after reading all the other threads and put all my thoughts into one post. Sorry about that.


29 posted on 06/24/2004 8:32:07 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Littlejon

Wasn't there a poll a few days ago showing the Dem with a double digit lead in the Senate race?..That's a lot of ticket splitting..


30 posted on 06/24/2004 8:34:17 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool...any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Huh? Are you talking about the Irksome Bowles/Richard Burr race? I am not sure about recent polling on that race, but last I heard Bowles was ahead. Of course, he has been running ads for a while now and Burr has not run any in most of the state. I saw one last weekend while visiting relatives on a Raleigh station and that was the first one I have seen.

I am not too worried about that race either, as Burr can more than hold his own in a debate and has been a champion of tobacco and manufacturing interests here with a record to back that up. All Bowles has is his time in Clinton's Administration where he was not as friendly to the tobacco and manufacturing interests here, especially with regards to furniture.

Add to that the fact that Bush will likely be making appearances with Burr and that Bowles is trying everything he can to distance himself from Clinton and I think the race is far from over.

But, I am a "glass half full" type by nature so take it for what it's worth! :)


31 posted on 06/24/2004 9:03:16 AM PDT by Littlejon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Littlejon

Yup..that's the one..I'm not to worried about it either.. look, Edwards "dropped out" to run for president because he wasn't sure he could hold the seat, an if he lost, his political career is over..and Liddy clobbered Bowles last time out, and she's working really hard to defeat him again..I've become a big fan of hers..but I was just mentioning the race in the context of the polls in the articles...notice now a 5-7% lead for W is "slim" in the story...it also seemed inconceivable that Bush coudl be ahead by that marging, and Bowles ahead by an even bigger margin..it doesn't compute..


32 posted on 06/24/2004 9:08:40 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool...any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Gotcha! I wasn't clear on what you were saying. I generally don't put a lot of stock in polls, as I have found that they aren't that accurate at the local or national level. I remember a poll showing a race was "close" several years ago (may have been a Helms/Gantt race, I don't remember!) all the way up to the election. Turned out not to be that close at all in the end. All I really remember was how the pundits were left scratching their heads!

I think local polls, especially those in MY neck of the NC woods (Peidmont/Triad) are so skewed they are pathetic. I know the Greensboro News & Excuse does them from time to time and they are almost predictable before they come out. They are disgustingly left-wing in their views and are becoming more brazen about it.

I think NC is pretty safe this year in Senate and Presidential races. Now, if we could just get Tax Hike Mike out of office.....


33 posted on 06/24/2004 9:47:34 AM PDT by Littlejon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson