Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MODESTO False alarm near ex-Peterson home
sfgate.com ^ | 6/23/04 | Charlie Goodyear

Posted on 06/24/2004 5:54:22 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-375 next last
To: All
I was over at Webslueths, and read something I never heard, so I will copy/paste here.

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9073

They are discussing Amber, and that she didn't tape all the conversations, but LE had account of all of them, and knew she was not cooperating!! One of the poster's then , says this:

"Remember about a book that amber frey gave scott that LE took from house??? It had a note in it warning scott of the wiretaps. Beginning to look like amber frey may of helped SP after all. Would not be the first time this has happened. I know she was suppose to be cleared BUT

Another post...."LE was recording her calls w/o her knowledge, so they knew when she talked to scott anyway...she apparently told them she hadn't talked to him, when she really had a time or 2.....that was very upsetting for me, when i read about this on msnbc....i so wanted geragos to not have anything on her, as far as the wiretaps, but he'll have a field day with her for sure now.... showing that she wasn't entirely honest with LE, won't look good, imo.... & about the sleepovers with laci's friends....i just wish that hadn't happened either.....heard tonight that nancy grace told the prosecutors to "put up or shut up".....& now this juror #5....UGH, UGH....."

Don't have time to post my thoughts now...but yesterday's happenings are disgusting. The Media has itself to blame for us not getting camera's into the courtroom. __________________

61 posted on 06/24/2004 12:03:41 PM PDT by Neenah (What if the Hokey Pokey IS really what it's all about ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: liz44040

....;)


63 posted on 06/24/2004 12:10:44 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs

Thanks, that snip it explains it all... he is gaga over Geragos....


64 posted on 06/24/2004 12:23:54 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

I haven't heard any other updates lately. Other than they are still seeking cooperation of the person in interest, Evelyn's married boyfriend at the time. He refuses to talk. And last known, family was seeking public help via news media on trying to solve her death, and where could her son be?


65 posted on 06/24/2004 12:26:30 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

"To me, he seems like he wants to go back home and lay around in front of the tv, maybe go to the beach. This trial is seriously eating into his 'personal' time.
And if he can get a book deal, some $$$, and some noteriety, so much the better! I think the trial made his head hurt. He had to self medicate with Gameboy. Wonder what time he gets out of bed on non-trial days!"

Are you talking about juror #5 or Scott???? LOL


66 posted on 06/24/2004 12:36:40 PM PDT by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

"To me, he seems like he wants to go back home and lay around in front of the tv, maybe go to the beach. This trial is seriously eating into his 'personal' time.
And if he can get a book deal, some $$$, and some noteriety, so much the better! I think the trial made his head hurt. He had to self medicate with Gameboy. Wonder what time he gets out of bed on non-trial days!"

Are you talking about juror #5 or Scott???? LOL


67 posted on 06/24/2004 12:41:53 PM PDT by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: runningbear

This seems to ring true:

(Aired May 27, 2004 - 09:30 ET)

...TED ROWLANDS, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Both sides in the Peterson case are counting on hired guns to pick a jury.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We do nothing but look at jurors week in and week out, day in and day out for years.

ROWLANDS: Prosecutors have Howard Barenski (ph). His experience in high-profile cases dates back to 1985 and Bernard Getts. Barenski helped the defense pick a jury that found the New York subway vigilante not guilty of attempted murder. Barenski, who refers to his jurors as "his children," says he's recently proud of his work for the prosecution on the Martha Stewart case, where the jury came back with four guilty verdicts.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It felt great. It felt like justice was done. And it felt like my children came through.

ROWLANDS: Jo Ellen Demetrius is working for the defense. She, too, has extensive high-profile case experience, starting with the O.J. Simpson trial.

JO ELLEN DEMETRIUS, JURY CONSULTANT: If I were to look at any one case that I felt good walking out of the courtroom about the jury, certainly O.J. would be that jury.

ROWLANDS: Both consultants have spent the last 2 1/2 months in court, scrutinizing every member of the Peterson jury pool.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There were joys in their facial expressions, how they dress, how they walk, everything.

DEMETRIUS: How they react to the attorneys, too, is a big component of how we're evaluating these people.

(snip)
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0405/27/ltm.04.html


68 posted on 06/24/2004 12:51:38 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: drjulie

Gee, now that you mention it....


69 posted on 06/24/2004 12:51:48 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: All

Oops, sorry for the repeat. Seriously, this guy is a piece of work, a Scott clone. He seemed to be impressed by style over substance and he really identifies with SP. He's softened some of his earlier statements; however, I don't think he would vote to convict unless the prosecution had a video tape of the crime. Even then, I'm not sure. Not only does he identify with SP, he doesn't seem to have the ability to think probabilistically. He simply can't understand that there are too many coincidences. For all the crazy things he's said, however, there probably are a few kernals of truth. One of those "kernals" is that the prosecution's presentation is probably lacking. This is a great opportunity for them to retool. I bet the defense is absolutely sick that they lost this guy. I can't believe Varinsky selected him!


70 posted on 06/24/2004 12:54:16 PM PDT by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs

justice served, is justice delayed... that makes me want to heave!.... These juror selections... Although, many times, it is warranted.


71 posted on 06/24/2004 12:58:09 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
"My girlfriend wants to kick the crap out of the Court TV lady," Falconer said on the transcript, but later said he didn't discuss media coverage of the case with family or friends -- they simply offered information.

And how did they know that he was on the case if he didn't tell them? Thank goodness this jerk is off the jury.

72 posted on 06/24/2004 1:16:52 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
And how did they know that he was on the case if he didn't tell them?

EXCELLENT! This could be the reason the judge dismissed him. This didn't come out til after the judge first ruled that he could stay on the jury. But of course #5 shot his mouth off one time too many and the judge booted him. (of course, by now he's shot his mouth off much more than once too often)
73 posted on 06/24/2004 1:44:30 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

New Amber info coming up on CC...Seems Geragos has spent the day proving have truthful Scott is by his crossexam of Broncchini....
Seduction of Amber:Nov. 20th, first date ...Elephant Bar..he had a suite...Scott..They said he had lost $100,000 year before, concerned about changes coming in his life...

Discusses his travels all over the world , carved initials and dates on champagne corks, as he has with other women..Lawyer called him like Clinton.LOL

Dec 2...hiking with Amber and daughter, goes to buy tree , calls Amber's daughter his daughter"family" to salesman...Dec9th..Tells Amber he's lost his wife, buys boat...(premeditation)? Dr. says no one would be so obvious..Vinny disagrees.

Dec. 13h He declares no desire to have children, Amber's daughter is enough...Also talked about vasectomy.(motive..no child support, no entanglement with a child that is lasting by law.)

Defense is saying yeah but..Nothing concrete....

CC is a two trip believer...

Galanter says Geragos took the wind out of the "cad" case by saying up front he was a cad. ...and he never confesses.

Crier saying no way abducted.


74 posted on 06/24/2004 2:20:42 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

She is pushing the 24th call to Amber while he's in the shower.again and I don't know where that's been verified.(said he was duck hunting, called her on 25th ..26th said he was in New York and missed his plane to Europe).


75 posted on 06/24/2004 2:27:16 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Christmas formal 14th.


76 posted on 06/24/2004 2:29:16 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Thank you so much for posting allof that. My husband called right when catherine was talking.

Holy Cow!

Ron Frey's attorney is on-wants to sequester jury-is willing to pay for it!!!!!!Has already reserved block of rooms in a hotel!!!


77 posted on 06/24/2004 2:34:44 PM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Good grief! ..hurts Amber's credibility as it is to aid prosecutors?? Ron Frey's filed a motion with DA to have jury sequestered. He has offered to pay for jurors accommodation if they will be sequestered.( #5 set him off...)


78 posted on 06/24/2004 2:40:09 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Ron Frye's attorney says that Amber has NO FACTUAL EVIDENCE OTHER THAN THEIR RELATIONSHIP!!!


79 posted on 06/24/2004 2:41:02 PM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

I have to leave...Bye for now!


80 posted on 06/24/2004 2:42:37 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson