Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Army covers up an ‘embarrassment’ (Pregnancies)
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/743101.cms ^ | THURSDAY, JUNE 17, 2004

Posted on 06/25/2004 10:12:45 AM PDT by take

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: take

"Oh, I thought you said to clean my GUN, Sergeant."


21 posted on 06/25/2004 10:48:07 AM PDT by Sender (Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -Tolstoy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender

LOL


22 posted on 06/25/2004 10:48:49 AM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: take
Would an unwed female soldier getting pregnant while deployed not be considered "conduct unbecoming"?

Is this also not one of the many arguments against women in the military - particularly in "front line" sort of rolls?
23 posted on 06/25/2004 10:52:14 AM PDT by TheBattman (http://www.miniclip.com/bushshootout.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Showing the fallacy of the policy of PPA and others, who assume that people are rational about sex. Back in WWII they handed out condoms to the troops down at hood. The principal use was as waterbaloons.


24 posted on 06/25/2004 10:57:59 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Conduct unbecoming an E2?


25 posted on 06/25/2004 11:13:28 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"Why should the Army be embarassed? Mixed-gender forces were imposed on them by politicians over military protest. Pregnancies were inevitable..."

That's what I was thinking. Then I realized that a lot of the brass in the Army are women with that agenda who got in after politicians made way for them.

In the '90s, quite a few of the men in the Army were getting very PC--pro-feminist, pro-abortion, all of that. As our civilian society goes, so will go the Army. The last straw for me getting out of a Guard unit was when they gave us a platoon sergeant who was a prior Navy social worker.

Put homo-activists, feminist and agreeing lechers in control of civilian politics, they gain control of the military, eventually.
26 posted on 06/25/2004 11:15:34 AM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
How about dishonorable discharges for all of them unless they can prove they were impregnated by their husbands before leaving for duty?

You are joking, right?

My wife's co-worker's daughter went into the Air Force 5 years ago as a single girl of 19 years. She was sent to Okinawa, got pregnant, (single still), had the child and continued in her Air Force work with NO REPRECUSSIONS.

A year later, the same scenario (with a different father, still single, had the kid, kept getting promoted. A year after that, SAME THING AGAIN!

You know what happened the third time she had an illegitimate kid? Do you know what the Air Force did to her??

They moved her to a 4 bedroom house in base housing!

I kid you not.

The military has been completely and totally Clintonized.

27 posted on 06/25/2004 11:15:47 AM PDT by Chieftain (To all who serve and support those who serve - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: take

Why are they surprised? This is bound to happen anytime you put young men and young women in close proximity away from home.


28 posted on 06/25/2004 11:18:05 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent

Amen to that!
They put the fear of God in me while I was in and I resisted a "come on" by an officer's daughter out of that fear.
What's changed!

mc


29 posted on 06/25/2004 11:48:03 AM PDT by mcshot ("When you don't think too good, don't think too much" Ted Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle; dd5339

The real tragedy is the kids who have no family from this behaviour. But while I have come to change my previous stance on women in the military, it DOES take two to 'tango'. The men are equally responsible for these pregancies. Y'all seem to always blame the women for having sex and getting pregnant. Maybe we should temporarily chemically sterilize the men, especially if women are removed from the Forces...after all, that way, there'd be no increase in unwanted or aborted babies in the local populations where ever our (all male) troops are deployed.


30 posted on 06/25/2004 11:51:31 AM PDT by Vic3O3 (Jeremiah 31:16-17 (KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vic3O3
Y'all seem to always blame the women for having sex and getting pregnant.

What on earth did I say that would lead you to believe I think that?

31 posted on 06/25/2004 11:58:01 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
"Would an unwed female soldier getting pregnant while deployed not be considered "conduct unbecoming"?"

Getting pregnant isn't a crime, but the action required to get that way is. That being said, don't forget that the pregnant woman is no less at fault than the man who fathered the child. A simple paternity test should get you your second defendant for the military court hearing.

"Is this also not one of the many arguments against women in the military"

No, this is one of the many arguments against letting irresponsible idiots into the military and giving them firearms. If two people (women don't spontaneously get pregnant) aren't responsible enough to keep their pants on like they're supposed to, then why should anyone entrust their life to them?
32 posted on 06/25/2004 11:59:14 AM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mcshot
To hear some of the people on threads like these, you'd think there is some uncontrollable, overwhelming instinctive urge. Are you saying that men and women in the military really can keep their pants on if they want to? My goodness, what an amazing concept: personal responsibility. (/sarcasm)
33 posted on 06/25/2004 12:02:04 PM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: take

Just let Congress try to enact a draft law that includes women. Our birth rate problems will be over, because you can have and nurse a LOT of babies between age 18 and 25.


34 posted on 06/25/2004 12:15:45 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: take

And then some idiots, even on FR, want to draft women.


35 posted on 06/25/2004 12:18:36 PM PDT by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn

I know...I have had a few teens..young maybe 13 who did not know but a woman??


36 posted on 06/25/2004 12:30:59 PM PDT by pitinkie (revenge will be sweet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vic3O3
"Y'all seem to always blame the women for having sex and getting pregnant. Maybe we should temporarily chemically sterilize the men,..."

Maybe we should just physically castrate only the heterosexual soldiers to make all feminazis and their effeminate male sidekicks happy (irony, sarcasm).

But that's beside the point that although many women who do the more civilian-like duties in our military serve their country well, women who cannot be somewhat segregated from men in the military due to MOS requirements should be in civilian occupations.
37 posted on 06/25/2004 12:48:30 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
"And then some idiots, even on FR, want to draft women."

Yes. And to those Aunt Nancies, I say that they should recruit their own Amazons for their own personal lives and not bother us with their private preferences.


38 posted on 06/25/2004 12:53:55 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

There is no UCMJ offense defining, or proscribing, conduct unbecoming an elisted member. The offense does not exist.


39 posted on 06/25/2004 12:55:28 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: take

Its been happening on the ships for years. The women go home early and get shore billets. Guess what. There are less shore billets available for the sailors who have done their time at sea.


40 posted on 06/25/2004 1:00:12 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson