Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Families of gun-violence victims speak out
CNEWS ^ | June 25, 2004 | NOAH LOVE

Posted on 06/27/2004 4:17:57 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: CanadianBloodAmericanHeart

I guess I was right about the Parti Quebecois being for the gun registry, unless you correct me.


21 posted on 06/27/2004 6:48:37 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Who's the other party that wants to keep the gun registry besides the Liberals and the NDP, the Parti Quebecois?

I can only think you're referring to this sentence....

"The other three parties are in favour of keeping it, though the Liberals want to put a $25-million cap on the administration costs."

Only three parties, disregarding the Greens which I'm sure the vast majority of voters will.

22 posted on 06/27/2004 6:52:01 PM PDT by kanawa (Demand Better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CanadianBloodAmericanHeart
Lorne Nystrom
Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle(NDP)
Link

"Many people have asked me about my position—and the federal New Democratic Party’s position—on the federal gun registration system.

It is important to understand that the issue here is gun registration, not gun control. Over the years, New Democrats have supported a number of bills aimed at gun control. For example, we supported the current system of Firearms Acquisition Certificates when these measures were brought before the House in the aftermath of the tragic events in Montreal on December 6, 1989. This bill sought to ensure that persons with a pre-disposition to firearms-related violence – for example, persons with a history of domestic violence – were prevented from obtaining a license to own a gun.

We have supported prohibitions on the private ownership of military-style weapons and the registration of handguns (something which has been required under Canadian law for decades)......

....The principled opposition to C-68 is based on a number of factors. For example:

-Registering the guns of law-abiding citizens does nothing to tackle the root causes of violent crime like drug and alcohol abuse, mental illness or family violence. It diverts resources from meaningful investments in reducing crime and thereby enhancing public safety over the longer term.

-C-68 simply doesn’t work. It has failed, for example, in its promise to stop the illegal smuggling and trafficking of weapons, long and short, in the streets of Canadian cities (The recent Toronto shootings confirm this fact). It has become a bit of a cliché to say so, but criminals don’t register their weapons. Statistics Canada reports that 80% of persons accused of gun-related homicide do not have firearms licenses and 75% of the handguns used in those homicides are not registered.

-$60,000 in federal funding for SAFE (the Saskatchewan Association for Firearms Education), a firearms safety training program, has been squeezed out by the swelling costs of this registration system. If we are really concerned about preventing firearms-related deaths, training gun owners on the responsible and safe use of firearms is more likely to achieve this goal than registering the guns of law-abiding citizens.

-The legislation violates the treaty hunting rights of First Nations people."


More recently (you folks will luvvve this) Jack Layton leader of the NDP had this to say....

""What we are focusing on is the increasing evidence that the biggest problem is illegal guns coming in from the U.S.," Layton told reporters.

"We're proposing going across the border to the U.S. and actively engaging in lobbying to have gun-control laws in the U.S. strengthened" link

Hope you give him a fitting reception ; ~)

23 posted on 06/27/2004 7:24:57 PM PDT by kanawa (Demand Better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Getting a licence and registering a gun is a small price to pay."

Sez you, lady. I refuse to pay a damn thing for something I didn't do. Get productive, address the real problem, go after the real bad guys, and leave the law-abiding alone.

Idiot.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

24 posted on 06/28/2004 7:50:01 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson