Posted on 06/28/2004 5:39:59 AM PDT by runningbear
Good grief...RG is right I need to clean my glasses or get new ones..I can't read the rest but the license is for 2003...must have run out of 2002 licenses at the end of Dec...Consider my entire posts concerning license false, lack of sufficient information...inadequate representation. I apologize.
I just watched the A&E special. They made a point of saying that the prosecution believes that Laci was killed in the home. I wonder how they know that? If there is no forensic evidence. Just curious.
They assume she was strangled?...They believe she was killed when getting undressed the night of the 23rd?
>>They assume she was strangled?...They believe she was killed when getting undressed the night of the 23rd?<,
They didn't say assume, they said BELIEVE.
No apologies necessary. ;~)
One more question....
If Scott was in such a bad way financially, where did he get the $10,000 in cash that he had when he was arrested?
Well, we'll never know as her head is missing and the body so decomposed...Suffocation doesn't leave forensics, either....I can believe without definite proof by other information that is available. See my #161. That and the information about his capture is all I need....
Amber is an interesting addition...his marriage wasn't "glorious", he wasn't what he seemed to be before Lacis disappearance or after(character stuff..and motive to be footloose, free of child support, etc)
Assumed from the country club in Modesto buying back his membership.
Thanks!!
Glad to see you here!
Yes, I managed to catch Greta's brief segment--or rather, brief screaming match--on the case tonight.
I noticed that ex-DA Hammer looked rather chastened and made reference to the fact that he personally holds the opinion that Scott did it. Heh.
Yes, I finally saw that segment which showed Ron and Sharon walking briskly along, and Ron said of Geragos, "If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bull!"
How nice of him to leave that last syllable off.
GO RON!!!!
I asked the question after hearing Hammer...OK, which one of you hammered Hammer with Emails!!?
Yes, that is an amazing number of calls. Their call pattern reminds me of how it was when I was 14 and for the first time a boy called me on the phone. He would call about 10 times an hour.
It seems that maybe there was something really interesting going on, true, but we have to think back to how Scott was acting in that time period, the few times the media managed to run after him and get a clip of him. He was very clearly HIDING. And I think he was hiding from the chance that Amber would see HIM on TV--HIM, the husband of the missing WIFE. So, for that reason, I don't think their conversations had any confidences from Scott about what he had just done.
Are you listening??
Come back here!!
That's what I think happened.
Wait! I went to that site you posted, the FAQ's on getting a CA fishing license.
What if Scott had gone out into SF Bay, but had wanted to possibly go beyond the Bay, and keep going, out into the ocean? I mean, maybe he was trying to be prepared for that eventuality.
Not that that boat would be safe to do that in, but then, that boat wasn't really all that safe for what he DID do, was it?
That the police wondered about Amber's credibility is no surprise to people who don't allow their emotions to rule how they view the facts. IOW, Amber does not walk on water.
That a supposedly innocent witness (Amber) needs her own attorney is also an indication that there is more to Amber than the public knows.
That's a great summary, thanks!!
Working from memory here, the Ocean Enhancement Stamp is only called for from Pt. Arguello south. Pt Arguello is about 250 miles south of the Golden Gate. It's not required just outside the GG.
But if the decision of what stamp was required was made by the clerk who issued the license, I'm sure an Ocean Enhancement Stamp seemed reasonable if somebody said they wanted to fish in the ocean. We're talking Big 5 here, probably not well versed on the fishing laws. Evidently our extreme outdoorsman wasn't up to snuff on them either.
No need to apologize. There's still something fishy about his license story!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.