Posted on 06/28/2004 5:39:59 AM PDT by runningbear
thanks hergus.. kind of behind myself today... ;o)
Thanks Meg...and I keep saying if there WAS any exculpatory evidence...we wouldn't be here either.
What they have is questions for one oficer that only another officer can answer, apply MUD, questions about why eyewitnesses weren't followed up on(dog returned at 10:18 thus no need)...were unwilling to look at anyone but Scott as perp, apply MUD....Everyone who was investigated was not investigated enough, apply MUD. Attack, insinuate and confuse...standard operating procedures..
Yeah, this "snipe" poster is just another one of those immature guys who likes to get women's attention by being "naughty". He knows a fair amount of women follow this case, so a fair amount of women will be on this thread.
Regarding dissing of blacks, well, let him continue, and see what happens on this website when people get all racial. LOL.
All were admonished and warned yesterday...Janey, the Peterson spokeman may not be on the witness list and we will still hear her assurances of Scott's innocence.
Mu husband just keeps piling them in the glove compartment, or the good old sock drawer,....
I still don't see what's so compelling about this case and turn the channel whenever it's mentioned.
That goes for the Kobe vs. Katelyn case too.
Well--*yawn*, why don't you save your time and energy, and not read the threads about it either.
Oh, stuff it. I was pinged to the thread.
Who's Kobe? Just kidding. He's the baseball player that was accused of raping some high school kid I believe.
Anyway, Like you, I scan past stuff that isn't geopolitical (or local) in nature, or just plain interesting - like the guy who bbq'd his kitty. But murder and rape cases are things I see as "jerry springer" stuff (unlike the aforementioned kitty thing of course) and they fall off my radar.
I knew there was a Peterson guy in the news but wasn't sure what it was about, although I suspected he was accused of murdering someone. But without some sinister link, like he was a creationist that killed an evolutionist or something like that, it just isn't that interesting to me - unless the USSC is hearing it for some reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.