Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Iraqi prime minister seen as puppet, outsider
Associated Press ^ | June 29, 2004 | Associated Press Staff

Posted on 06/29/2004 11:53:46 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

Date posted online: Tuesday, June 29, 2004
New Iraqi prime minister seen as puppet, outsider


BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- Iyad Allawi, the prime minister who took power in Iraq on Monday, is dismissed by militant Shiites and Sunnis as a puppet of the Americans. To many Iraqis, he is an out-of-touch "outsider" who has no popular base.

One thing is certain though: the CIA-linked opposition leader-turned-politician seems determined to do everything he can to restore security, including use of some tactics that hark back to Saddam Hussein's days.

The challenge facing Allawi, 58, is twofold: to win the acceptance and cooperation of a mostly skeptical population and to deal with a ruthless and increasingly sophisticated insurgency.

"This government will act randomly like the Governing Council before it," said Khaled Mohammed, a 42-year-old taxi driver.

"It is appointed by the occupier, who does not want anything good to come to our people," he said, speaking from a long line outside a gas station.

"This is a temporary and illegal government," said Shiite cleric Moussa al-Nagi. "Yes, Iyad Allawi is a Shiite, but he is not an Islamist and his thoughts and aspirations have nothing to do with Shiites or Sunnis."

Such sentiments are not uncommon in a nation where many blame the Americans for their daily hardships, the precarious security of the past year and what they see to be the imposition of politicians like Allawi, who was in exile for 30 years before returning to Baghdad last year.

Even after his return, he has spent much of the past year traveling abroad -- so Iraqis have had little chance to get to know the one-time exile opposition leader.

Allawi has been projecting an image of strength and resolve in his public appearances since being named to his post at the beginning of June.

"We will ensure the safety of our people and we will ensure safety of the country," Allawi said in a firm tone of voice when asked about the first thing his government will do.

When reminded by a reporter of the failure of the U.S. military with all its might to suppress the insurgency in more than a year of combat, he said: "The most powerful military helped us in liberating our country and we are very grateful.

"The security of our country and our lives is in our hands ... we have measures that will be declared today and tomorrow to enhance and ensure our security."

Allawi has said his government will pass new laws giving security forces a stronger hand in arrests and allowing them to impose curfews.

He is also planning to recall to active service units of the disbanded Iraqi army to help with the fight against the insurgents.

Such a move could have benefits on two fronts: acquiring the service of seasoned soldiers and depriving insurgents of their expertise. Many army officers -- disenfranchised and embittered by their post-Saddam unemployment -- are known have been advising insurgents in combat tactics.

Saddam's 400,000-strong army was disbanded in May last year by L. Paul Bremer, the American governor of Iraq who handed power to Allawi on Monday. Allawi says he opposed the disbanding, which is widely thought to have prompted noncommissioned and junior officers to join the guerrillas.

Allawi also made other overtures to the army on Monday. He said he would "restore the dignity" of the army, retrain soldiers for civilian jobs or offer them "retirement with dignity and honor."

The often-frowning Allawi coupled his gesture to the army with a strongly worded appeal to former members of Saddam's Baath party, also disbanded by Bremer last year, not to cooperate with Saddam loyalists and to inform authorities of their activities.

Allawi, who was once a senior Baath party member and was later the target of an assassination attempt by Saddam agents that left him hospitalized for months, is known for his pragmatism.

He has said that his CIA links were nothing to be ashamed of since he used them to get rid of Saddam. But for a nation bred on hatred of the United States and sees the acronym CIA as a symbol of evil, it may not be easy for Allawi to explain away those links so easily.

In Fallujah, a turbulent Sunni city west of Baghdad, fighters have an anecdote they share with visitors to show their resentment of the "outsiders" like Allawi.

Soon after U.S. Marines lifted a three-week siege of the city in April, six trucks carrying electrical domestic appliances arrived in Fallujah. On the side of one truck was a banner that read: "A gift from Dr. Iyad Allawi to the people of Fallujah."

The mujahedeen, or Muslim holy warriors, intercepted the convoy and asked the drivers to turn around and head back for Baghdad. The drivers insisted they be allowed to reach the mayor's office.

"We told them: 'You can do that, but we will burn your trucks there' and they quickly left," recalled one fighter, Waiel Sarhan, who said he witnessed the incident.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: allawi; ccrm; iraq; keywordsgohere; presstitutes; steyn; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
I heard a short clip on the radio this morning of Dan Rather asking Allawi some about if he was "a puppet of the U.S.". If anyone has a LINK to an article quoting him saying that, can you please send it to me on the thread here? Thanks.



And regarding this article, I saw FOX News this morning reporting that a Coalition (CPA) poll showed that 73% of those polled supported Allawi. They noted that the CPA has published polls regardless of whether they were favorable or not favorable to the CPA as well. Just fyi .....


1 posted on 06/29/2004 11:53:46 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

this article is pure chit and should be removed


2 posted on 06/29/2004 11:55:18 AM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

And the media desperately searches for a way to minimize another victory for President Bush.


3 posted on 06/29/2004 11:56:31 AM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
I didn't post it because I agreed with it. I hope it's not removed.

4 posted on 06/29/2004 11:56:44 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Call me the Will Rogers voter: I never met a Democrat I didn't like - to vote OUT OF POWER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08; *CCRM; *Presstitutes; Happy2BMe; devolve
Exactly!

5 posted on 06/29/2004 11:57:50 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Call me the Will Rogers voter: I never met a Democrat I didn't like - to vote OUT OF POWER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

AP isn't even trying to hide it anymore, are they?


6 posted on 06/29/2004 11:58:05 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
The press honeymoon is over for Allawi. LOL!!

The media won't quit until Saddam is back at the helm. Only then could they acheive their ultimate goal of mocking the US effort as truly failed.

7 posted on 06/29/2004 11:58:36 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Steps to writing for the AP:

1. Make a conjecture that has an anti-Bush premise;
2. Find at least 2 Iraqis who agree with that premise;
3. Quote them at length;
4. Offer no counterbalancing claims;
5. Submit article.

It's quite telling that they offer no contrary evidence. What--they couldn't find two Iraqis on the street to say something positive? If this had been an article talking about how Iraqis like Allawi, they would have felt the need to "balance" that with some negative comments.

Typical biased b.s.


8 posted on 06/29/2004 11:58:40 AM PDT by johnfrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Has the AP been engaged by Zarqawi to put out press releases on behalf of his Jamaat al-Tawhid wa'l-Jihad organization.


9 posted on 06/29/2004 11:59:34 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
is dismissed by militant Shiites and Sunnis

Oh. . . from the headline I thought the story referred to the general population.

I hope AP corrects that!

10 posted on 06/29/2004 12:00:35 PM PDT by Flyer (This dog bite me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

"To MANY Iraqi's, the PM is seen as a puppet..."

MANY... I guess, technically, the four Iraqi's who's interviews were selected as quotable can be called "many".

So the article is accurate. Misleading in the extreme, but accurate.


11 posted on 06/29/2004 12:00:49 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Pure bulls--t!!


12 posted on 06/29/2004 12:01:25 PM PDT by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnfrink
2. Find at least 2 Iraqis who agree with that premise;

2a. Make sure one of them is a taxi driver, the other an activist cleric. Make no effort to go out and systematically interview a variety of Iraqis.

13 posted on 06/29/2004 12:04:09 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
Oh. . . from the headline I thought the story referred to the general population.

I hope AP corrects that!

haha ! I'm not holding my breath. :^D


14 posted on 06/29/2004 12:04:36 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Call me the Will Rogers voter: I never met a Democrat I didn't like - to vote OUT OF POWER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: johnfrink
1. Make a conjecture that has an anti-Bush premise;

1a. If news is very good, make conjecture that is equally bad.

i.e.: Early handover of power = More Americans killed/Iraqis STILL miserable (include pic of woman crying)/New govt is reactionary puppet govt. with no legitimacy.

15 posted on 06/29/2004 12:09:29 PM PDT by SquirrelKing ("I have to march because my mother could not have an abortion." - Maxine Waters (D - California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP; joanie-f; snopercod; JeanS; Alamo-Girl
One of the most frustration aspects of national elections in the U.S.A., is that the authors of the above article, determine who will be President of the United States on election night.

The Associated Press has polling agents stationed across America, who are, or are associated with, the many AP correspondents.

Those people are supposed to report back to the AP, the vote count at each county seat in the U.S.A.

Yet they also report back their own, demographic polling data taken before, and during, election night, that is supposed to indicate to them, who will win, who is winning --- REGARDLESS OF THE ACTUAL VOTE COUNT.

The numbers tabulated on the TV screen and anywhere else, ARE ALL ESTIMATES.

They are not the actual vote count.

Now, some of the total for a candidate, is made up actual vote counts as reported by some county seats' board of elections, but there are still added, estimates for each candidate, so the total on the TV screen is NOT the actual total of actual county seats' reportings.

In theory, the numbers are supposed to be accurate, but in practice, not everybody out there is completely honest about the numbers they report.

In 1996, I had thought that surely the results for Bob Dole must be wrong. I called the RNC. They told me that they do not keep track of the numbers, "the AP does it."

The government does not even do it.

So, in my humble opinion, on election night, there should be no reporting at all, about the elections.

We should wait for the actual tally about a week later.

No candidate should make any speech of any kind, for a week.

Just silence.

Then, somebody may like to concede.

All the show on election night, is just that, a show.

Supposedly, since 1996, the AP has been under some pressure to do a better job of being accurate, but "that remains to be seen."

I don't trust them.

Reading the above article reminds me of how much I don't trust them.

Because when the gentleman in question, first took charge, there were glowing reports on how he was the better choice --- AP Wire stories --- instead of using the man who was more favored by the White House.

Now that, is "conflicted" with the indoctrination by the socialist journalism professors at university where the AP staff learned how to write politically-correct-nik, that is, give no quarter to the truth, rather, use the Marxist Thesarus and all its adjectives and idoms to paint the truth in to a corner that cannot be seen by the readers: Tell lies and make them "good ones" in order to gain another inch of socialist absolutism.

16 posted on 06/29/2004 12:11:51 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

You know, I saw the headline and said to myself, "Self, I bet this story is from AP or Rueters". They're getting too predictable.


17 posted on 06/29/2004 12:12:04 PM PDT by Warren_Piece (Just thinkin' about women and glasses of beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Sow City Iowa has spoken.


18 posted on 06/29/2004 12:13:54 PM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
"dismissed by militant Shiites and Sunnis"

As in the terrorists? Folks, never underestimate how truly evil the left is. They have done this many times before. They will denigrate the Iraqi government for being pro American and they will try to bring in horrible anti-American dictators who will rape and murder the people. They will then justify the murderers' anti-American actions.

19 posted on 06/29/2004 12:15:25 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
When reminded by a reporter of the failure of the U.S. military with all its might to suppress the insurgency in more than a year of combat...

Good to see the media supports our troops. It took over a year to stop the guerilla fighting in occupied Germany after WW2. Was that a 'failure' too? The historical ignorance is staggering.

20 posted on 06/29/2004 12:16:26 PM PDT by rudypoot (Rat line = Routes that foreign fighters use to enter Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson