how do you do that online?
Smutty words are speech, but pictures? Not in my opinion. That's like saying you can't require people to wear clothes in public because of free speech. I mean...just because the nudity is on paper and words can sometimes be on paper (or computer monitors), doesn't make nudity on paper (or screens) speech. That's an invalid argument. Why do we have such a stupid Supreme Court?
pass it on.
Maybe its just me but I always considered "free speech" to mean the right to criticise the Goverment, for example.
Somehow I don't think pictures of people having sex is quite what the Founding Fathers had in mind.
Another Clinton Law stuck down by the Supreme Court.
The problem is not just MY child veiwing porn, it's the neighbor child. Like violence on tv, MY child becomes victim of someone else's problem.
It's time to fire the entire Supreme Court and ammend the Constitution to impose term limits on the "Justices'" tenures. Attorneys are self serving and corrupt by nature and should never be given such resposibility and absolute power.
I'm thinking that it shouldn't be an issue of "free speech."
No one is telling these pornographers that they can't sell, "express", ect...their filth. Just not to kids. That's why they call it "adult language," "adult behavior."
Just as a liquor store owner can't sell to minors, he can control who he sells to. The porno pirates don't care, they can't regulate just who looks at their trash online. As long as it gets seen.
Sick.