Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel stands firm over its nuclear secrets
The Daily Telegraph ^ | July 7, 2004 | Ohad Gozani

Posted on 07/06/2004 10:11:16 PM PDT by MadIvan

Israel said yesterday that it would not abandon its "no show, no tell" nuclear policy, because the long-standing strategy of deliberate ambiguity had paid off.

As Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, arrived in Israel, officials from the Israeli prime minister down said there was no need for a change which could only set off a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

Ariel Sharon told army radio: "I don't know what he is coming to see. Israel has to keep in its hand all the components of power necessary to protect itself."

The prime minister added: "Our nuclear policy has proven itself and will continue."

Israel is believed to have become the only nuclear power in the Middle East when its ultrasecret nuclear plant in Dimona in the southern Negev desert began operations in the 1960s .

But it has persistently declined to confirm or deny any nuclear capability under a tacit deal with America, declaring instead that it would not be the first to introduce atomic weapons into the region.</p<

Briefing reporters on the eve of Mr ElBaradei's two-day visit, officials said that in his talks with Mr Sharon and other Israeli officials the IAEA chief would try to press for some Israeli acknowledgment of its nuclear capability.

Israeli officials expressed confidence that the visit would not be confrontational as Mr ElBaradei was fully aware of the Israeli position, which might remain in place as long as the Arab-Israeli conflict remained unresolved.

They said the United Nations official would not tour either the Dimona plant or the Israeli research reactor at Nahal Soreq, south of Tel Aviv. Instead his talks would focus on broad issues, including the need for a nuclear-free Middle East.

Israel has resisted pressure to sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, and thus is not obliged to show or declare its nuclear capacities or activities to United Nations inspectors.

Experts believe Israel has stockpiled up to 200 nuclear devices with plutonium produced at the Dimona plant.

The extent of the Israeli weapons programme was revealed in 1986 by Mordechai Vanunu, who secretly took pictures of various phases of the operation and sold them to a British newspaper.

Mr Vanunu served an 18-year jail term for treason.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofweasels; elbaradei; iaea; israel; neoeunazis; nukes; traitor; treason; vanunu
Well done, Israel! They know full well the UN wants them helpless and disarmed.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 07/06/2004 10:11:17 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AngloSaxon; Dont Mention the War; KangarooJacqui; Happygal; Luircin; Fiddlstix; lainde; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/06/2004 10:11:47 PM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

In spite of having nuclear weapons, Israel wages conventional warfare against relentless enemies.

Israel owes no one in the UN, or the IAEA anything.


3 posted on 07/06/2004 10:27:34 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Just another Bush-bot biddy drinking that Republican KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

maybe Israel should just show Mud-hammed a pic of a nuclear mushroom cloud and say "see there" then boot him outta the country!!


4 posted on 07/06/2004 10:34:34 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I can't help wondering if Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran don't already have nuclear weapons.

As in nukes secretly planted in Damascas, Mecca/Medina and Tehran by Israeli operatives...
just awaiting the day that they'd be needed to b-tch-slap a leader who needs put down quickly.


5 posted on 07/06/2004 10:36:15 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Or as a Doomsday Device.
6 posted on 07/06/2004 10:56:09 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

bump and thanks!


7 posted on 07/07/2004 1:19:06 AM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Neither confirm nor deny....I expected no less--and no more.


8 posted on 07/07/2004 1:21:26 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (If it seems like a good idea, imagine it diabolically twisted in the hands of your worst enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
declaring instead that it would not be the first to introduce atomic weapons into the region

If Israel builds one, and if it lies in the region, does that not count as "introducing"? Maybe it reads a little different in Hebrew but in English it looks like double talk. Now it would not look like double talk if instead of "introduce" they said "reveal, threaten to use, or use."

9 posted on 07/07/2004 1:28:38 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson