Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. Didn't OK Uranium Transfer to U.S.
Yahoo ^

Posted on 07/07/2004 4:48:25 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

U.N. Didn't OK Uranium Transfer to U.S.

40 minutes ago

By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS - The United States didn't have authorization from the U.N. nuclear watchdog when it secretly shipped from Iraq (news - web sites) uranium and highly radioactive material that could be used in so-called "dirty bombs," U.N. officials said Wednesday.

The nearly 2 tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1,000 highly radioactive items transferred from Iraq to the United States last month had been placed under seal by the International Atomic Energy Agency at the sprawling Tuwaitha nuclear complex, 12 miles south of Baghdad, the officials said.

"The American authorities just informed us of their intention to remove the materials, but they never sought authorization from us," said Gustavo Zlauvinen, head of the IAEA's New York office.

U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham (news - web sites) disclosed the secret airlift from Iraq on Tuesday as "a major achievement" in an attempt to "keep potentially dangerous nuclear material out of the hands of terrorists." The material was taken to an undisclosed U.S. Energy Department laboratory for further analysis.

The airlift ended on June 23, five days before the United States transferred sovereignty to Iraq's new interim government.

IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei said in a letter to the Security Council circulated Wednesday that Washington informed the agency on June 19 that "due to security concerns" it intended to transfer some nuclear material stored at Tuwaitha to the United States.

The agency took note of the U.S. intention to remove the nuclear material "from agency verification," he said.

According to the letter, the United States informed the IAEA on June 30 that approximately 1.8 tons of uranium, enriched to a level of 2.6 percent, another 6.6 pounds of low-enriched uranium, and approximately 1,000 highly radioactive sources had been transferred on June 23.

A U.N. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there was some concern about the legality of the U.S. transfer because the nuclear material belonged to Iraq and was under the control and supervision of the IAEA.

The U.S. Energy Department statement said "the U.S., consistent with its authorities and relevant United Nations (news - web sites) resolutions, took possession of and removed the materials to ensure the safety and security of the Iraqi people."

Iraqi officials "were briefed about the removal and sources prior to evacuation," the statement said.

In 1992, after the first Gulf War (news - web sites), all highly enriched uranium — which could be used to make nuclear weapons — was shipped from Iraq to Russia, the IAEA's Zlauvinen said.

After 1992, roughly 2 tons of natural uranium, or yellow cake, some low enriched uranium and some depleted uranium was left at Tuwaitha under IAEA seal and control, he said.

So were radioactive items used for medical, agricultural and industrial purposes, which Iraq was allowed to keep under a 1991 U.N. Security Council resolution, Zlauvinen said.

IAEA inspectors left Iraq just before last year's U.S.-led war. After it ended, Washington barred U.N. weapons inspectors from returning, deploying U.S. teams instead in a so far unsuccessful search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

An exception was made in June 2003 when Washington allowed an IAEA team to go to Tuwaitha to secure uranium after reports of widespread looting when the fighting ended.

The IAEA recovered most missing material and Zlauvinen said the uranium was put in sealed containers and left for the Americans to guard.

But because U.S. authorities restricted inspections of Tuwaitha, the IAEA team was unable to determine whether hundreds of radioactive items used in research and medicine across the country were secure.

ElBaradei's letter said that an unspecified amount of nuclear material still at Tuwaitha consists mainly of natural uranium, some depleted uranium and some low enriched uranium waste, which is subject to IAEA monitoring.

Some radioisotopes are also still in the country and come under the agency's responsibilities, he said.

Tuwaitha is now under the control of Iraq's Ministry of Science and Technology.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dirtybombs; iaea; iraq; un; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Well give it to the UN - on their doorstep in NYC.
1 posted on 07/07/2004 4:48:26 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Call the Waaaaaaahmulance.


2 posted on 07/07/2004 4:50:35 PM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Who cares whether we have UN approval or not?

This is a US run war, without their help, why would we expect to notify them of anything?

Besides, did they have US approval for the oil for food program Graft? Probably NOT!


3 posted on 07/07/2004 4:51:01 PM PDT by illiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"The American authorities just informed us of their intention to remove the materials, but they never sought authorization from us," said Gustavo Zlauvinen, head of the IAEA's New York office.

We never sought authorization? Hahahahahahaha! What are these guys afraid of, that we might develop nuclear technology?
4 posted on 07/07/2004 4:51:14 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The United States didn't have authorization from the U.N.

To quote Judge Judy: "So ?!?!?!!!"
5 posted on 07/07/2004 4:51:49 PM PDT by TomGuy (After 20 years in the Senate, all Kerry has to run on is 4 months of service in Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"Our leader, Abu Annan, our Emperor at the UN, says that the stinking isotopes are for us.
He will have you concentrate on spam, while we get to continue slavery,
terrorism, rape, and beheadings.
Ha! SO why don't all you dhimmis just give up and surrender NOW,
like the spineless and cowardly French and Spanish so eagerly have."


6 posted on 07/07/2004 4:52:06 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ohhhhhhh, beggin your pardon, Mr. Coughie, but last time I checked we were still a sovereign nation. For how much longer is in doubt, given the Globalists among us.


7 posted on 07/07/2004 4:52:38 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gosh, does this mean we'll have to send it back?
8 posted on 07/07/2004 4:52:43 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Should send Cheney to this guy to give him a good talking-to.


9 posted on 07/07/2004 4:52:45 PM PDT by thoughtomator (End the imperialist moo slime colonization of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes
Gosh, does this mean we'll have to send it back?

Snicker..Who gives a frogs fat a** what the UN thinks anymore? The very fact that the US just took the stuff without telling anyone, tells us what the admin thinks of the "august body"..

10 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:20 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Its noteworthy that the two biggest shills for the left are Michael Moore and Al Franken..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The U.N. Bugged Out months ago.

They are out of it.

Dummies!

11 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:24 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Now we have two "Johns" to flush! And both appear to plugged up and overflowing with crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why don't we move the UN to Baghdad?

(Wait, I know I've read that before somewhere...)


12 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:33 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
A U.N. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there was some concern about the legality of the U.S. transfer because the nuclear material belonged to Iraq and was under the control and supervision of the IAEA.

Did you catch that? The UN doesn't even have the guts to identify themselves when criticizing the US. Why not?

13 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:38 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does Kerry know we didn't ask the UN's permission? Now the US cannot regain the respect of the world. omigosh!


14 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:40 PM PDT by austingirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
The UN wants us to let them do MORE oil (radioactive materials) for food ($$$$$) when they did soooo well the last time?
15 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:47 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't confuse disagreement with argumentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes

I have a small bucket of beautiful white sand from the beaches of Florida/Alabama, and the instructions are for the UN to go pound it up their clinton/kerry.


16 posted on 07/07/2004 4:56:14 PM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Who gives a frogs fat a** what the UN thinks anymore?

Apparently our elected officials do...they're constantly bending over for them and sending them our hard earned tax dollars.


17 posted on 07/07/2004 4:57:41 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What's the U.N gonna do about it? Make us to Veto a resolution?


18 posted on 07/07/2004 4:58:16 PM PDT by FredWolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Howlin; Liz; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog
...Gustavo Zlauvinen, head of the IAEA's New York office.

Time to ship this entire operation some place it can do some good - like Baghdad...

19 posted on 07/07/2004 4:58:44 PM PDT by Libloather (I STILL blame Carter for disco...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

You know, I wonder if anyone is a little worried the U.S. may find out exactly where the nuclear material came from.


20 posted on 07/07/2004 4:59:26 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson