Posted on 07/07/2004 8:08:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Interesting take, sir. I just thought Kerry was tossing the "Hail Mary" in hopes of putting some life into his campaign.
This is scary Jim. I hope this feeling that we are on a slippery slope to destruction will go away. I can't imagine America with those two at the helm.
We just lived through eight years of it. The thought of even four years of Hillary is frightening indeed.
The narrow 2000 win would keep down scuttlebutt that the election was a rejection of the Clinton years, and the convincing 2004 win would discredit whatever candidate ran that year.
Sounds like he's suggesting that the Clintons deliberately self destructed in their second term so that Bush would have a chance to win in 2000, albeit by a small margin.
No question there's a fight for the party between the clintons and the Kennedys.
What I've noticed is that the media have been bashing Bush just about nonstop. But they have also been mildly undermining Kerry as well. Most of them favor Kerry, but from time to time very liberal sources will run stories that damage him.
The only thing that can prevent Bush from winning is continued lying by the liberal media. If the clintons really want him to win, and if they have enough leverage, all they have to do is to persuade the media to start admitting that Bush has done a good job in Afghanistan and Iraq, and that the economy is doing pretty well too.
She can't wait longer than 2008. She'll be far too ugly by 2012. Looks count. That is why JFK picked Edwards.
Trust me; the Clintonistas will do everything they can to insure that the Kerry/Edwards ticket loses in November. I've said many of the same things Jay Bryant said in this article. Hillary does not want to wait until 2012; she'll be too old. She has had her eye on 2008 ever since 2000 and she will not be deterred.
Why would one assume that? Nothing else has.
Hey! What are you doing posting? Aren't you supposed to be at your keyboard steadily banning DU trolls? :)
Chris
P.S. Good post.
"Hillary Rodham Clinton didn't decide to run for Senator from New York back in 2000 because she wanted to help the people of the Empire State, or because she thought it would be a wonderful honor to join the world's greatest deliberative body."
'She's just a devil woman, with evil on her mind.
She's just a devil woman, she's gonna get ya'
Everybody sing along! 'She's just a devil woman...
I would not fret about this. It's one theory amongst thousands.
John Edwards: The political equivalent of breast implants.
One thing I noticed today is that Rush was in a major "funk". Really down. It got me a bit worried that he senses something just ain't right with the Bush campaign. Even Joe Scarborough was harping on how great Edwards is and almost predicting a kerry win. He really pissed me off. I can't stand to listen to him anymore. Just hope the clintons have a few monkeywrenches to throw into the mix.
That only happens in the Republican Party. Democrats always support their candidate.
Remember Rockefeller sabotaging Goldwater? Anderson vs Reagan. Buchanan vs Bush 41. McCain vs Bush 43...
I think you're right.
However, I still think Kerry may have health problems before November, and she has an eye on 2004.
Thanks for the ping!
That's just a little too tin-foil-hat-esque for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.