Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Humidity takes blame for repeat Lasik procedures
HoustonChronicle.com ^ | July 7, 2004 | PATRICK KURP

Posted on 07/08/2004 5:52:31 AM PDT by Max Combined

After almost 40 years of wearing glasses and contact lenses, vision correction was no longer a matter of mere vanity for Phyllis Ward.

"I just wanted to see better. I first got contacts in elementary school, but I never felt as though I could really see," said Ward, 50, who lives in Houston with her husband and three children.

In May 2001, Ward underwent Lasik surgery on both eyes. Lasik is short for Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, a treatment for nearsightedness that uses pulses of ultraviolet laser light to sculpt the cornea, the transparent frontal portion of the eyeball. More than 1 million Americans are expected to undergo the procedure this year.

The day after Dr. Douglas Koch, a professor of ophthalmology at the Baylor College of Medicine, performed the surgery, Ward remembers saying, "Oh my gosh! I can see!"

For several months, the results were dramatic and gratifying. But by late 2001, Ward's vision was growing blurry again. She strained to see her son on the soccer field, and night driving proved especially hazardous. She returned to Koch for a fine-tuning procedure on her left eye, and he had another go at her right eye earlier this year.

Ward now has what she calls "full-blown vision." She has no regrets about choosing the Lasik procedure, and Koch, who estimates he has performed the operation almost 8,000 times, suspects he knows why Ward's eyes needed the follow-ups, known among eye surgeons as "enhancements."

As editor of the Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Koch recently published an article by Dr. Keith Walter, an ophthalmologist at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C., that blames humidity -- a fact of life in both North Carolina and Houston.

Walter noticed he was performing follow-ups in November and December on patients who had undergone the Lasik procedure during the previous humid summer months. He reviewed the 368 surgeries he had done on 191 patients in 2000, and considered a dozen variables, including patient age and sex, cornea curvature and various environmental factors. About 15 percent of his patients required at least a second Lasik procedure.

His conclusion: Humidity is the culprit. Walter found that during the drier months, he tended to over-correct, which left patients somewhat farsighted. During the most humid part of the year, he tended to under-correct, which left patients still slightly nearsighted. In Houston, the average morning humidity is 89.4 percent, and it reaches an average of 92 percent from June through September. In contrast, Winston-Salem reaches a peak average morning humidity of 90 percent in September.

Walter reported that for each 10 percent increase in operating room humidity, nine out of 100 Lasik patients required a second procedure. He also noticed some correlation between outdoor humidity and temperature in the two weeks before surgery, and the overall effectiveness of the procedure

Walter theorizes that as humidity increases, corneal tissue absorbs more moisture and, thus, less laser energy. As a result, less tissue is removed.

"Humidity has a definite effect on the amount of correction that results for any given programming of the laser," said Koch, who tries to adjust the humidity in the operating rooms he uses to between 40 percent and 42 percent.

Manufacturers of Lasik equipment suggest maintaining the operating room humidity between 35 percent and 65 percent for the most reliable results -- a window of variability Koch called "a very wide leeway." Many doctors have already been using humidifiers or dehumidifiers to adjust moisture levels accordingly, and Koch says he believes doctors must learn through experience to customize their procedures to adapt to local climate conditions.

Koch said his enhancement rate was lower than Walter's, between 5 percent and 10 percent. A possible explanation is that while Houston is always humid, and Koch has always adjusted his Lasik equipment accordingly, temperature and humidity vary more widely across the seasons in North Carolina.

Koch speculates that doctors may have to recalibrate their machinery as the seasons change, but more study is required to substantiate that claim.

Outdoor humidity clearly has an impact on the water content of a patient's corneas, but doctors are uncertain how quickly they adjust to the lower humidity levels in an operating room.

"Your patients are outside in the real world with all of those influences, including temperature and humidity. We don't know the rate of adjustment to indoor conditions. We know the outdoors probably has an influence on the treatment rate," Koch said.

Walter reported that he has devised a new formula for programming his equipment at Wake Forest that takes humidity into account, and that results have improved.

"This is the first study to show that environmental factors can affect Lasik outcomes. For best results, physicians should take these factors into account when calibrating laser equipment," said Walter, who suggested that patients considering the Lasik procedure should inquire about temperature and humidity controls in the operating room.

For her part, Ward said, "I'm perfectly happy with the way I see now. A little tweaking, going in again to see the doctor, was a small price to pay."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: lasik; vision
Posted for those are thinking about having this done.
1 posted on 07/08/2004 5:52:31 AM PDT by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Oh man, thank you. Another question to ask about a procedure I have been contemplating having done.


2 posted on 07/08/2004 5:58:18 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Monthly donors make better lovers. (Ask my wife))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Dang,

Where is John Edwards when you really need him?


3 posted on 07/08/2004 5:58:46 AM PDT by Chesner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined
Powder..patch..ball FIRE!

I had this procedure done 3 years ago in Feb. I had "complications" and had very bad vision for 6 months (still better than it was with glasses) and then had both eyes done again (enhanced).

I would go through all the hassle and pain again without hesitation because I love my new vision so much.! It was worth it all.
For the record the doc told me that the complication I had was about one in a thousand.

4 posted on 07/08/2004 5:59:08 AM PDT by BallandPowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

I'm currently maxing out my FSA (300 a month) to save up for one of my eyes. (I'll do the other one next year, all tax-free). This is REALLY good info.


5 posted on 07/08/2004 6:00:22 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I'm holding out on Lasik until cyber replacement is a reality. That way, if the procedure ruins my eyes, I can sue to get a complete upgrade.


6 posted on 07/08/2004 6:03:57 AM PDT by vollmond (DS2 CV-66 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

So these guys don't have air conditioning and a dehumidifier?


7 posted on 07/08/2004 6:28:52 AM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

I guess if I ever need this, I'll have it done in Colorado, no humidity to worry about there.


8 posted on 07/08/2004 6:33:53 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined
I went to an optician about this yesterday. He will not get the surgery done on his eyes and recommends disposable contacts.
9 posted on 07/08/2004 6:35:20 AM PDT by Vision (Always Faithful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

I had Lasik done in 2001 in Canada. It has been great. I feel like I overcame a handicap.


10 posted on 07/08/2004 6:52:45 AM PDT by jtminton (Every time you get something you didn't earn, somebody earned something they didn't get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

My husband, my son & daughter-in-law have all had this procedure done in Houston (not by this guy) & none of them have needed "tweaking".


11 posted on 07/08/2004 7:05:58 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Well, the redo rate is 15% so it makes sense that out of three people no one needed to have it tweaked. If twenty of your family had the procedure, we would expect two of them to need tweaking.


12 posted on 07/08/2004 7:12:38 AM PDT by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vollmond
cyber replacement

You won't be allowed in any bathrooms, locker rooms, or government buildings.


13 posted on 07/08/2004 7:16:54 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vision

I hate to sound like a cynic, but let's face it: If everybody had the surgery done, a lot of opticians would be out of business. I suggest you seek the advice of an ophthalmologist before making any concrete decision.

Regards,

PS: I have not had the procedure done, but I wish I could afford to do so.


14 posted on 07/08/2004 7:18:05 AM PDT by VermiciousKnid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VermiciousKnid
My husband is an Optometrist. Everyone in our family of 5 has pretty myopic eyes (-4.5 and higher), and none of us will be having Lasik done for a long time, if ever. He does follow-up care, and has seen cases that go wrong- even ones done by one of the most skilled eye surgeons. Also, what is determined to be a "success case" does not necessarily mean the person sees 20/20. One of the causes for problems that arises after surgery is that people heal differently... some fast, others slowly, some have glare problems that can not be fixed.
While your point about an optician needing the work sounds logical, it's really not. Until there can be successful surgery to correct for distance as well as for reading, people will need glasses. We all end up needing reading glasses at some point as we age. You're also assuming EVERYONE will line up to get the procedure done, which wouldn't happen. You could say the converse is true, Ophthalmologists ENCOURAGE people to get the surgery because of the money they make on it.
15 posted on 07/08/2004 9:03:40 AM PDT by luckymom (Forget the baby whales, save the baby humans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: luckymom

My sister had this done and regretted it. It caused a problem with dry eyes. Her eyes would make no tears at all. That caused the corneas to ulcerate. She had to put drops in her eyes every few minutes. It really was a nuisance. It interfered with her work and her entire life. She is a doctor and could not do surgery. When driving, she had to put drops in at stop lights. She could not drive on the freeway for any length of time. It took about a year for the problem to improve, but for that year, she was miserable.


16 posted on 07/08/2004 9:21:58 AM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VermiciousKnid
You have to redo the surgery when your prescription changes. Mine has been changing every five years or so. Don't like the idea of going under the laser and shelling out that cash every five years.

Ever seen this...

http://www.surgicaleyes.org/Index.htm
17 posted on 07/08/2004 9:22:12 AM PDT by Vision (Always Faithful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson