Posted on 07/08/2004 9:33:06 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - Rats fed artificial sweeteners ate three times the calories of rats given sugar, a finding the study's authors said suggests sugar-free foods may play a role in the nation's obesity epidemic.
Other scientists, however, dismissed that conclusion, saying studies on people don't indicate that. One researcher called the rat study nonsense.
The experiment by Purdue University researchers appears in the July issue of the International Journal of Obesity. The scientists said their rodent findings could help explain why Americans have grown fatter over the past two decades even as the nation's consumption of artificially sweetened sodas and snack foods has soared.
They contend that artificial sweeteners could be interfering with people's natural ability to regulate how much they eat by distinguishing between high- and low- calorie sweets.
As part of their study, they fed two groups of rats sweet-flavored liquids for 10 days. One group got only sugar-sweetened liquids, while the other was fed liquids sweetened by both sugar and saccharin.
After the 10 days, both groups of rats were given a sugary, chocolate-flavored snack and regular rat chow.
Both groups of rats ate about the same amount of the chocolate snack. But the rats fed both sugar and saccharin ate three times the calories of the rat chow than the rats fed only the sugar-sweetened drink.
Susan Swithers, an associate professor of psychological sciences at Purdue, said the findings suggest the rats given the saccharin-sweetened drink ate more rat chow because they experienced an inconsistent relationship between sweet taste and calories.
That, in turn, could confound their natural ability to keep track of calories.
"Consuming artificially sweetened products may interfere with one of the automatic processes our bodies use to regulate calorie intake," said Swithers, the study's co-author.
Adam Drewnowski, director of nutritional sciences at the University of Washington in Seattle, said that whatever caused the rats to overeat is unclear and could have been caused by something other than the sugar-free liquid they were fed. He said the rat results have no bearing on human research.
"They're extrapolating and saying that humans may not be adjusting to the artificial sweeteners because they're expecting calories and the calories are not coming in. I just think this is nonsense," he said.
Drewnowski said a 1994 French study he helped direct compared people given yogurt artificially sweetened with aspartame with people who ate yogurt sweetened with sugar. The study found no differences in eating behavior between the two groups.
Terry Davidson, a Purdue professor of psychological sciences, said the team's findings involving saccharin cannot be extended to more commonly used artificial sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose, sold as Splenda.
G. Harvey Anderson, a professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Toronto who was not involved in the Purdue research, said its findings could be explained by the fact that rats like the taste of saccharin.
He said the rats who overate could have favored the saccharin-flavored drink and then compensated for its lack of calories by eating more rat chow. "I just find this data hard to interpret," Anderson said.
Maybe this explains why everyone I see drinking Diet Coke is such a lard@ss.
For a moment I thought this was another Kerry/Edwards article...
Well, as to whether or not the hypothesis is correct, I don't know.
But it has been known for years that aspartame DOES cause a release of insulin.
I have often wondered what the up and down bounce of blood sugar levels due to this extra insulin does to the body's ability to maintain blood sugar levels.
Any comments?
When I quit regular sodas, I switched to unsweetened tea with lemon. Everyone kept suggesting their favorite diet (artificially sweetened) drink. Why trade one bad habit for another??
I told you that Diet Coke would make the rats fat!
I told you!
My system cannot tolerate processed sugar, so I have been drinking unsweet tea for years, it is something you just get used to. It has gotten to the point that I can't stand to eat or drink anything sweet anymore, it makes me nauseated. No lemon for me though, can't stand the stuff...I got sick in high school because everyone was using that nasty lemon perfume in class when it was popular, haven't been able to tolerate the smell since (yikes...telling my age). Being in Texas, I have a problem with restaurants that only serve sweet tea, it just irritates me to no end!
P.S. Another irritant is Nestea...that crap is NOT tea!!! : )
Well now we've got a bunch of fat rats...what should we do...Atkins?
I think that's because they feel that since they have "been good" by sticking to Diet Coke, they can go ahead and have three pieces of chocolate cake.
Naw just give them some disease caused by labs.
Labs cause disease?
One (Monsanto) researcher called the rat study nonsense.
Or go to a Wendy's at lunch, and you'll see calorically challenged folks having what they think is a "diet" lunch: a huge sugar-free soda, and a salad. Never mind that the salad is mounded with cheddar cheese, hard boiled eggs, ham, and bacon, and is topped with a half cup of blue cheese dressing -- it's a salad, isn't it? And therefore good for you.
The capacity many of us have to delude ourselves is infinite.
Oddly enough, just about everyone I've ever met who was on a diet was overweight, too. Diets must make you fat!
Or maybe, perhaps, we can realize the difference between a correlation and causality?
************
No, Labs don't, but Chihuahuas do.
Sounds like a perfect meal on Atkins to me. (Though a half-cup of dressing is overkill.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.