I wonder if we could brainstorm all the reasons why--logically, 'sensing,' feeling, etc.
we believe that THIS TIME, there will be great devastation within X HRS/DAYS.
PERHAPS WE COULD ALL CONTRIBUTE to a fleshing out of the rough outline below with an annotated OUTLINE form listing the supporting evidence in line or phrase form???
It might also guide our analysis, searching toward filling in gaps or weak areas.
For example, we have from another thread, the listing of the recent Bilderberger meeting membership. DO WE HAVE SUFFICIENT FREEPERS IN THEIR ORGANIZATIONS TO BE ABLE TO PLOT WITH ANY DEGREE OF COMPLETENESS AT ALL--WHAT CITIES THOSE POWER CREATURES ARE IN OR UNUSUALLY ABSENT FROM?
For me:
1) Too many puzzle pieces pointing in that direction--say more than a dozen or three dozen at rough guesstimate.
2) High ranking spokesman puzzle pieces seemingly significantly different from earlier alarms.
3) 'Chatter,' noise, pontifications, etc. on Islamofascist sites has a more shrill, smug, haughty, arrogant tone to it.
4) Movements of ships, troops could be construed as evidence. This one is weak, for me. Anyone strengthen it?
5) 'Rumor' connections--2nd, 3rd, 4th party puzzle pieces are more sobering by at least 1-3 orders of magnitude. Anyone add more to this basket of puzzle pieces besides Mossad1967's?
6) Surveilance seems to have picked up on the part of suspicious persons. I'm not so firm on this one but seems true, to me. Any additions here?
7) It FEELS closer. If 10 = within 1-3 hours and 1 = 1-3 years . . . I'd say . . . It feels like it's 3-12 days off.
8) It FEELS MORE like it's closer. That is, if 100% is CERTAIN about #7) above, then I'd say my feeling is at a 65-95% 'certainty' range.
I believe that if at least 15-25 of us would catalogue ratings like the above every 3-7 days, we could graph that and that graph would be instructive, over time.
9) I can't believe I've covered all the bases. Anyone else have items to list or items to add to elements of the above list?
Yeah. This is the most important "sign" out there. Watch what they do, not what they say.
We have a greater percentage of our combat ships at sea than at any time since WWII.
Our strategic air resources were deployed overseas shortly after the navy started leaving port.
I'm an Air Force vet. NO WAY is this an exercise.
Somethings up, and the government has known about if for at least 6 weeks. Whatever it is, it's big enough that we are trying to preserve our military assets, have them in place to deter a fight with China/Russia/North Korea/??, and be ready to fight and win if we have to.
The signs that we are expecting something soon are everywhere, but exactly what and when is probably not known by anybody on our side.
Quix - isn't it that something like every sea-worthy Carrier Strike Group has been "forward deployed" (eg: to the seas around N Korea), and the Nighthawks (Stealths, nuclear capable) bombers are in S. Korea?
"Operation Summer Pulse" moved up 15 months earlier, IIRC. MASSIVE hardware movement.
Something like 91% of all our boats (including nuke subs) are out of dock right now. This is apparently unprecedented, and costs BOOKU $$s - something not done lightly.
To me, this sounds like forward deployment - putting the chess pieces in place in case they are needed.
Anyone know for sure if the 10 Nighthawks in S. Korea right now are carrying nuke payloads? Would really like to know the answer to that..
This is not a rant , but the opinion of just one Piper.
We had those horrid little keywords, thank goodness Jim the GentleMan got rid of that and helps us as he does.
But I am a little concerned for anyone coming to this thread, be it the alphabets, journalists, etc. will not take us seriously if we tout Eol/Daleel and I for one was glad to see them gone.
Many of us feel that those two and any unsourced info has no worth for our fight on the WOT. I appreciate all of the translations for they are straight from the jihad mouths and websites from SP and Jill. They are not meanderings or predictions ya know?
Also, when we get info posted from the likes of Steve Quayle, etc without reliable sourcing or reputation that also bothers me, for then we do look like a group of tinfoil wannabe's instead of the cybersurfing slueths we aim to be.
Again just my opinion.