To: RGSpincich
yes, I read that, and realized it is not personal checks.... Then the questions arose in stolen from the warehouse, and then, what next in this type of investigations that is aimed at Geragos theory?
11 posted on
07/12/2004 6:44:24 AM PDT by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
To: runningbear
This Judge needs to admonish the Petersons!
Also, when Snott piped up in court when the Judge inquired about the spelling of Conner's name and looked to the Defense table for an answer, he should have said something about Snott answering.
The defendant should NEVER be permitted to speak in open court after the trial has started UNLESS he places his hand on the Bible and takes the stand!
12 posted on
07/12/2004 7:09:27 AM PDT by
Jackie-O
To: runningbear
So if they're not PERSONAL checks, then how can one say they were LACI'S checks? (Or Scott's, for that matter?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson