The love that dares not neigh its name

Cox News Service ^ | July 13, 2004 | Jay Bookman

[Petronski]

Jim, I'm not sure you've seen this quote:

I can't believe you think moveon.org is a communist/fascist site, and yet Freerepublic is somehow balanced.

At your unbalanced service,

jp

[Petronski]

And if you don't think writing discrimination into the constitution . . .

Do your lies never end?

[Petronski]

Most of the posts on here are whiney, so I don't see how I'm any different.

Could be the anal sex and manlove...

[Petronski]

If our constitution can ban a certain group from doing something, when it doesn't endanger anyone else...

Oooh. Another lie.

[Petronski]

Homosexuals would be discriminated against, because you are denying them the same life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that straight people enjoy.

Not so. That's a big stinking lie. Nothing in the law prevents you from getting married just because you are gay.

[Jim Robinson]

Free Republic does not claim to be "balanced" or faire:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts

Buh bye, troll.

[Petronski]

Yes, the were so committed to each other that they agreed to each of them getting there very own, living sex-toys. They imported their young male-concubines from Asian countries and support them in every way. Just the four of them living in a wonderfully normal and supportive group grope.

Sweet Lord! Is that true?

[spodefly]

See ya. I knew you would get banned (see post 169).

You might have been a worthwhile contributer had you avoided continuing on with the pro-gay posts. But I doubt it. You seem to be focused on your homosexuality as the sole definition for your life. Too bad.

[spodefly]

LOL.

I love you man. And I mean that in a healthy, brotherly sort of way.

[Petronski]

No eros, just delphos....got it. Back atcha. ;O)

[Taliesan]

Finally we're getting to some actual thought.

The premise of your argument is that the criterion for "abnormal" is "hurts others". (Please note there is no science or medicine or "modern psychology" in your premise. A mesolithic nomad could have articulated it -- and probably did.)

Therefore, masochism is "normal".

Or is there another criterion you want to add to your first?

[MissAmericanPie]

It's up to a healthy society where the line is drawn. We will not be told where to draw it by activist judiciary, or any government agency. We will demand that the Congress and Senate pass laws protecting the right of society to define marriage according to the general moral dictates, or what is considered the norm.

[Darksheare]

The return of JAY-SON.
Moveon.org IS communist.
What?
Don't ike hearing that?
OOooh, bet that stings a little to hear the truth.
Go home troll.
Oopsies, you did that already.

[subterfuge]

"Yes, the were so committed to each other that they agreed to each of them getting there very own, living sex-toys. They imported their young male-concubines from Asian countries and support them in every way. Just the four of them living in a wonderfully normal and supportive group grope."

"Sweet Lord! Is that true?"

It is absolutely true. On his last trip down he had pictures of himself and his "companions" traveling the world. He felt compelled to explain who was who and showed no reservations about doing so. Just so everyone knows, I still love the guy. He is the only living person on my Dad's side of the family that I know of. He has never been out of academics his entire life, which speaks volumes.

[Petronski]

[shudder]

[subterfuge]

"Ann Coulter's hypocrisy happened......I couldn't, in good conscience, live with it. :)"

See, hear's the thing. Your not refuting anything by saying this. Sure, Ann probably called someone a name. She's a writer and has to keep it interesting. Writing has to have some Pop and she no doubt responded to someone like Ted-the-swimmer-Kennedy comparing W to the Taliban. Of course I don't really know that because you never state exactly what you're talking about.

Also, I got your FReep mail and No, I don't know you. My mentioning that it was possibly time for your OPUS was an instinctive judgment by a true FReeper that immediately pegged you as a short-timer on the forum. Hope you come back to FR to get this message because I cannot e-mail your personal addy.

[PreviouslyA-Lurker]

Just because you do not know of anyone personally does not mean that they do not exist. I don't know anyone who has been murdered, but I know that people ARE murdered. I tried to find info for you regarding the harmful effects of anal sex on the web and can not go to those sites from the computer I am at. You can easily do a search yourself for the information.

[PreviouslyA-Lurker]

You seem to have some sort of mental block towards the word average.

[tdadams]

No, you seem to have a mental block about how this "average" probably isn't the actual average. In order to arrive at an actual average, you have to have a reliable statistical sample. I pointed out why this method does not provide that. That's your lesson for the day. You're welcome.