Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Malpractice maelstrom
The Washington Times ^ | July 14, 2004 | Masthead Ed.

Posted on 07/13/2004 9:56:15 PM PDT by neverdem

Illinois has become a malpractice minefield for physicians, especially those in high-risk specialties. Here's a particularly notable example: Several years ago, Dr. Lenard Rutkowski, a neurosurgeon in the Chicago suburb of Joliet, faced a malpractice lawsuit. During an operation, the lawsuit alleged, Dr. Rutkowski had removed an extra cervical disk. Months later, the patient complained of pain and discomfort in his neck. After years of litigation, the lawsuit resulted in a $5.6 million judgment against Dr. Rutkowski, far over and beyond his $1 million in insurance coverage. The patient made up the difference with Dr. Rutkowski's office furniture, home furniture, company car and office building. A lien was placed on his house, and his checking account and IRAs were frozen. By the fall of 2002, Dr. Rutkowski was forced to file for bankruptcy not only on behalf of his corporation, but also for himself. Now, his wife takes out loans to pay the bills.

Frightened by Dr. Rutkowski's nightmare, the last neurosurgeons in southern Illinois tendered their resignations as of May. As one doctor put it: "You could almost hear the pitter-patter of neurosurgeons leaving Illinois." According to Ted Kanellakes of the Illinois State Neurosurgical Society, virtually the entire southern half of Illinois now lacks access to neurosurgeons, which means that patients don't have access to care for head trauma, aneurysms and brain tumors. Skyrocketing malpractice insurance rates, along with the possibility of losing one's home and assets at the whim of a jury, are prompting the mass exodus.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: deathcultivation; health; healthcare; malpractice; medicine

1 posted on 07/13/2004 9:56:15 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Kerry-Edwards ticket is every ambulance-chaser's dream.
VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!


2 posted on 07/13/2004 10:03:19 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The real problem is that every office in Springfield is held by a Democrat. The Democrats have taken huge contributions from trial lawyers and refuse to discuss tort reform. There are no neurosurgeons in downstate Illinois. Women with high risk pregnancies can't find OB's who are leaving the state in record numbers. This is all thanks to lawyers like John Edwards. Illinois is a perfect example of what happens when Democrats take over. They also can't pass a budget since they promised every special interest group the world.


3 posted on 07/13/2004 10:03:20 PM PDT by Merry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Frightened by Dr. Rutkowski's nightmare, the last neurosurgeons in southern Illinois tendered their resignations as of May.

Thanks to John Edward's and his trial lawyer friends ...

4 posted on 07/13/2004 10:25:43 PM PDT by spodefly (This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Merry
Maybe it's time for patients injured by trial lawyers to sue them.

I wonder how difficult it would be to bring a suit (class action, of course) against the law firm that represented the patient who sued the doctor for $5 million. If we can get the trial lawyers suing each other, they may leave the rest of us alone.

5 posted on 07/13/2004 10:26:21 PM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Edwards is a big reason for the rising cost of healthcare.


6 posted on 07/13/2004 10:31:06 PM PDT by Vision Thing (Hate is not a family value, it's a liberal democrat value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformed_democrat

There was a better idea: someone had begun a list of trial lawyers involved in major malpractice suits against physicians, and doctors subscribing to this list were vowing not to treat these leeches.


7 posted on 07/13/2004 10:57:03 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
I heard about that (probably read it here -- I get most of my news on FR).

Wasn't there some discussion about the possibility of the lawyers suing those doctors because the doctors were not allowed to deny treatment to anyone?

8 posted on 07/13/2004 11:15:51 PM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zip; BOBWADE

ping


9 posted on 07/13/2004 11:25:42 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

I heard something of that several years ago in N.C. Seems that the doctors claimed that they could not reasonably be expected to treat someone, when they were in fear of being sued. This forced one female lawyer who had been involved in malpractice suits to travel a considerable distance in order to find an ob-gyn who would see her.


10 posted on 07/13/2004 11:28:20 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; *Death Cultivation
This reads like the intent of the lawyers is to make healthcare so rare as to shorten the American life span. That goes along with everything else the the biggest loonies of the Left endorse (and some (allegedly) on the Right seem willing to let them pull off).

See the threads linked at Death Cultivation (and under that same keyword) to get an idea at how bad their influence has been all around the world.

It was only a matter of time til they turned inwardly here. The plan of some doctors not to treat shysters is a plan that does not go far enough IMO.

11 posted on 07/13/2004 11:30:36 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Why would someone who practices neurosurgery only have 1 million in insurance, and no umbrella policy? What a moron.


12 posted on 07/13/2004 11:33:37 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

He was definitely underinsured, but let's face it, the additional liability insurance premiums probably would have been substantial. I am sure he was paying at least 8% of his gross for the $1 million. As a structural engineer, I am paying about 8% of my gross for a $1 million insurance policy, and I doubt I have anywhere the exposure he did. So I would guess a $5 million policy would have been at least 20 to 30% of his gross.

I also will bet he had never been sued before, at least not successfully. Umbrella insurance in such a case would not cover his professional liability.


13 posted on 07/13/2004 11:50:45 PM PDT by KAUAIBOUND (Hawaii - a Socialist paradise for left-wing cockroaches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

What's an umbrella policy, one that shields the doc's personal assets as opposed to the assets of the doc's corporation? Are they available in Illinois?

Regardless of this doc's inadequate coverage, the people of Illinois voted twice for a situation in which the southern part of the state has not a single neurosurgeon, i.e. at the polls and in the jury. They deserve what they got.


14 posted on 07/14/2004 12:09:30 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001
Amen, VERY Important ... and the part about Kerry/Edwards bears repeating:

" Where does the Kerry-Edwards ticket stand on all this? Both Mr. Edwards and Mr. Kerry, who have taken in millions from trial lawyers, have repeatedly voted against limiting malpractice lawsuits. The Kerry campaign Web site, in characteristically ambiguous fashion, informs us: "The Kerry plan will hold down malpractice premiums by requiring an impartial review of a claim before an individual could file suit and by eliminating punitive damages except in egregious cases. Kerry's plan will not put a cap on legitimate damage awards." Since juries deem which claims are "legitimate" and which cases are "egregious," not Mr. Kerry or Mr. Edwards, one can easily infer that "The Kerry plan" offers no reform. "

15 posted on 07/14/2004 1:29:21 AM PDT by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

WHEN you have people waiting for a doctor to slip up, you have a real problem, and to reward the people that sue with a life luxury is only inviting more claims ,I have never sued a doctor, or no one else for that matter, and I have seen a lot of doctors in my time ,it is almost too personel to sue, and taking someones home has got to be the worst of the worst.


16 posted on 07/14/2004 7:49:11 AM PDT by douglas1 (and IF LEFT UP TO YOU AND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What's an umbrella policy, one that shields the doc's personal assets as opposed to the assets of the doc's corporation?

Umbrella policies are sort of all-purpose insurance that come in to cover excess liabilities above and beyond the coverage in underlying policies. So, let's say the Doctor could only get 1 million (which is not true), he could have still bought umbrella insurance to cover.

What I would like to know is this - why does anyone have any sympathy at all for a Doctor who ruined someone's life because he was sloppy? The easy solution to this whole problem - don't remove the wrong disc.
17 posted on 07/14/2004 2:01:35 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
"During an operation, the lawsuit alleged, Dr. Rutkowski had removed an extra cervical disk."

The easy solution to this whole problem - don't remove the wrong disc.

Easier said than done. If the doc made a guarantee that the surgery would eliminate the pain, then he's a fool. Otherwise, the patient and the lawyer are exploiting the sympathy of an ignorant jury. BTW, thanks for answering my question.

18 posted on 07/14/2004 2:28:38 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
What I would like to know is this - why does anyone have any sympathy at all for a Doctor who ruined someone's life because he was sloppy?

So a life was "ruined." Did $5.6 million fix it? Would 8.3 million do better? How about $732 thousand? 86 trillion? Obviously there needs to be caps on non-economic damages. It may have been a horrible mistake--but unless this doctor has a history of such mistakes, he has saved hundreds of lives and eased the pain of thousands. And now, because of people with your thought process, we have lost another neurosurgeon. They don't grow on trees you know--but it only takes about 35 years to make one, with a solid 15 years of postsecondary training, but who cares.... You will care next time you suffer head trauma.
19 posted on 07/15/2004 10:58:41 PM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: newguy357
So a life was "ruined." Did $5.6 million fix it?

You have no idea what the facts are. But I know of many situations where $5.6 million would not be enough to fix it.

For example. I'm 32 years old. Let's say I make $250,000 this year. My income should grow significantly over the next 30 years. I have a family and kids who depend on me. If I were injured by a doctor, confined to a wheelchair and a life of pain, you better believe I am going to want more than $5.6 million dollars.
20 posted on 07/15/2004 11:01:48 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson