Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawking Changes His Mind on the Nature of Black Holes
Associated Press ^ | Jul 15, 2004 | Jane Wardell

Posted on 07/15/2004 8:30:32 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Jet Jaguar; Darksheare; King Prout; kenth; Deb; RadioAstronomer; Happygal; cyborg; GVgirl
Riiiiiight.

But when I posit a theory on quantum mechanics, the liberal media is all like: "Sure. We'll get right on that one...dumb-ass!"

Man, "Sky and Telescope" and "Astronomy" will be hearing from my attorneys, I can assure you of that much.

Stephen Hawking?

Pffft!

So I don't hold the Lucasian professorship in mathematics at Cambridge, whaddya gonna do 'bout it?

Greatest physicist since Sir Isaac Newton.

Big friggin' whoop!

41 posted on 07/16/2004 12:31:25 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("He must have committed a grave sin. I swear to you, Satan himself could have pissed in that water.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Oh, I thought this was a Whoppi Goldberg thread. Sorry.


42 posted on 07/16/2004 4:31:14 AM PDT by snopercod (Robert Bork for recess appointment to the Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I've never really bought the whole idea of light bending. I'm willing to accept the idea of the mean free path between reflection or refraction being so minuscule that the path looks curved, but I'm not quite sold that it actually bends.

The light doesn't bend. The spacetime it is passing through is bent (or warped) by the hypergravity enough that it is easily noticeable.

All gravity wells do this to one degree or another. It's been demonstrated with observations of bodies as small as our Moon. It's only recently that we've had instruments sensitive enough to detect the "bending" with anything less massive than a (presumed) black hole or a galaxy.

The light is still going "straight" as ever, whatever that really means. It's the reality around it that is shifting.

43 posted on 07/16/2004 4:42:37 AM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

No, he said black HOLES, not black ho's... ;7)


44 posted on 07/16/2004 4:49:58 AM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

My thoughts exactly.


45 posted on 07/16/2004 4:52:12 AM PDT by mict42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I actually went to a talk once on Gravitational Lensing. The phenomena is similar to some of the optical effects that you get when you observe visible light. The visual images the professor showed me reminded me of Sun Dogs, Halos etc....

I'm not sure it's the light being bent as much as it being refracted and reflected an innumerable number of times between the observer and the emitter. A black hole would leave a rather impressive absorption/scattering "footprint" from it's physical size alone.
46 posted on 07/16/2004 6:49:21 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Bury/Deadwards 2004!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

A link you might like.

http://astron.berkeley.edu/~jcohn/lens.html


47 posted on 07/16/2004 6:54:54 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

"astrophysicist Stephen Hawking backpedaled Thursday"

Hmmmmmmmmmmm is he a Kerry supporter by any chance? :)


48 posted on 07/16/2004 8:48:14 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
as it being refracted

It looks like a lens has been formed out of space in the vicinity of a massive object. It looks like refraction to me, but we have been operating under Kant's system for a long time now: the object in itself can never be seen, but what we see conforms to our pre-conceived ideas. That is, objects conform to our concepts rather than our concepts conforming to objects. You can see only what your mind is ready to see.

49 posted on 07/16/2004 9:24:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch

We are well met, indeed. Looking forward to future palavers, if it do ya. After all, we deal in hard calibers and hot lead.


50 posted on 07/16/2004 9:36:52 AM PDT by Euro-American Scum (A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: monkey

=== galactic traps may in fact allow information to escape.


Hey, just like my posts.


51 posted on 07/16/2004 5:08:04 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; LiteKeeper
C'mon now RA.

spec·u·la·tion    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (spky-lshn)
n.
 
1.

52 posted on 07/16/2004 5:20:23 PM PDT by AndrewC (I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
"A black hole only appears to form but later opens up and releases information about
what fell inside. So we can be sure of the past and predict the future."


Looks like Hawking is angling for a TV/movie deal; maybe a revivial of "The Time Tunnel".

(spoken in jocularity by a guy who isn't worth to tie Hawking's shoelaces...)
53 posted on 07/16/2004 5:25:40 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC; LiteKeeper

Ok sorry. Was a bit testy last night.


54 posted on 07/16/2004 5:45:59 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: The Scourge of Yazid
And I'm pretty sure a freakin' Black Hole ate my green sweater and let NO INFO THRU!!!!!

And where's the liberal media? Nowhere, Baby, nowhere.

55 posted on 07/16/2004 8:54:45 PM PDT by Deb (Hey, Sen. Kerry...why the long face?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Saw another version of this story.. with a more inflammatory headline.

Hawking: I was wrong for 30 years

56 posted on 07/16/2004 8:57:35 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

veritas


57 posted on 07/16/2004 9:21:03 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Secularization of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Deb
That happened to you too?(!)

Damn, those things are a pain in the ass!

They really should do something about them before someone gets hurt.

58 posted on 07/16/2004 10:37:44 PM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("He must have committed a grave sin. I swear to you, Satan himself could have pissed in that water.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; RadioAstronomer
I actually went to a talk once on Gravitational Lensing. The phenomena is similar to some of the optical effects that you get when you observe visible light.

I've been fascinated by how sound waves affected the following photograph, taken by Chris Rossi. This is Richard Noble's ThrustSSC, piloted by Andy Green at Blackrock, Nevada, on October 15, 1997, as it it set the world's first supersonic speed record. See the clearly visable waves above the car?

Source of photo: http://www.andrewgraves.biz/ssc_stuff/SSC_pics.htm
Official ThrustSSC Web Site

59 posted on 07/16/2004 11:45:20 PM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9
...as it it set the world's first supersonic speed record.

Correction: ...as it set the world's first supersonic land speed record.

60 posted on 07/16/2004 11:57:03 PM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson