Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wahhabi Islam: General Overview
Not published yet | Steven

Posted on 07/17/2004 10:56:56 AM PDT by StevenAU

“Wahhabi” Islam

The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 shook the United States to its core. Since those horrific moments, our nation has been thrust into a global war against terror and religious extremism. Now more than ever, it is of the utmost importance that we understand the thought processes of those who seek to destroy the very fabric of Western society. Nothing short of our way of life and our very existence are on the line. We cannot afford to lose.

What could possibly drive people to murder innocent civilians on such a large scale? What would lead a man to sacrifice his own life to take that of another? Why are these terrorists so filled with hate and animosity towards us, that their hate even overshadows their willingness to live? Many questions remain unanswered. Though some politicians would have us believe that the answers to these questions lie in US foreign politics, I believe that there is another force at hand: Wahhabi Islam.

Wahhabi Islam is a term commonly given to a strict Sunni sect of Islam. Followers of Wahhabi Islam do not refer to their religion as “Wahhabi” (Anon., Justifying; Bijlefeld; Hardy). Many merely call themselves “Muslim,” for according to their beliefs they are the only true Muslims. Some Wahhabists refer to themselves and their religion as “al-Muwahhidun,” “Salafi,” “Salafi Da’wa,” or “Ahlul Sunna wal Jama’a” (Anon., Justifying; Bijlefeld; Hardy). Depending on the region and dialect in use, other names also exist. For the sake of simplicity, I will refer to this religion as “Wahhabi Islam” and it’s followers as “Wahhabists.” By “Wahhabi Islam”, I am referring to the forms of Islam that share the strict revivalist vision and beliefs that were preached by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab in the late 1700’s.

Wahhabi Islam counts among its adherents such names as Osama Bin Laden and Saudi Prince Nayef (Cline; Haykel; Smith; Hardy). Various groups such as Al-Qaeda, Pakistan’s Jamaat-I Islami, The Islamic Salvation Front, and al-Jihad have also adopted Wahhabism as their official religion (Ahmed; Cline; Haykel; Smith; Hardy). The extremist religion offers many a theological justification and mandate to kill those they deem to be infidels. One should note that according to Wahhabism, the vast majority of Muslims (over 99%) are also to be considered “infidels, heathens, and enemies” (Haykel; Smith; Lopez).

Wahhabists have made their presence known worldwide. From the beheading of Daniel Pearl in Pakistan to the beheading of countless Russian soldiers in Chechnya, from the beheading of Nick Berg in Iraq to the beheading of Paul Johnson in Saudi Arabia 2 days ago, Wahhabists have shown a willingness to use television and the internet to display their gruesome acts of barbarism. To truly understand those that we must fight in this battle against terrorism, one must learn more about Wahhabi Islam and it’s extremist teachings.

The Origin and History of Wahhabi Islam

Wahhabism started as a movement within Islam founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703-1792). To fully understand the militancy of Wahhabi Islam, it is important that one learns of the warlike nature of Wahhabi Islam’s founder and the brutal times of war in which he lived. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

Having been born in a small oasis town in central Arabia, al-Wahhab grew up studying Hanbali Law, one of Sunni Islam’s strictest and most conservative schools. He lived and studied with his grandfather until he was in his early teens, at which time he left his home to move to the holy city of Medina, where he continued his Islamic studies.

After completing his studies in Medina several years later and now a young man, al-Wahhab traveled to a city in what is modern day Basra, Iraq. There, he taught Islamic law for approximately four years. Al-Wahhab then traveled to Baghdad where he continued teaching Islamic law. There, he met and later married an affluent woman. She later died and left al-Wahhab a large inheritance, which he used to travel the region. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

The early 1730’s found al-Wahhab residing in Iran. It was here that he first started to preach his new and radical thoughts on Islam. Al-Wahhab virulently attacked the customs and beliefs of the tribes in the region, many of whom were Sufi Muslim. He also extended his criticisms to the practices of the Twelver Shia, such as paying respect at the tombs of holy men. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

With the growing unpopularity of his criticisms against Sufi Islam in Iran, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab moved back to his native town of Uyaynah in the late 1730’s. Upon his return to his birthplace, al-Wahhab began writing the Kitab at-Tawhid, which would later become the main text of Wahhabi Islam’s doctrines. It was about this time that al-Wahhab begun to gather a larger amount of followers. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab’s extremist views and doctrines led to controversy in Uyaynah. Many of the town’s leaders were not fond of his fundamentalist approach to Islam. After all, merely invoking the name of the Muslim prophet Muhammad was, by al-Wahhab’s standards, a grave sin. In 1744, he was expelled from Uyaynah. Al-Wahhab then settled in Ad-Dir'iyah, which was under the control of a powerful tribal leader named Ibn Sa'ud. Ibn Sa’ud became a believer of Wahhab’s doctrines and the two formed a strong alliance. Al-Wahhab and Ibn Sa’ud swore a Muslim pledge with each other in which they vowed to establish a new state that would operate under al-Wahhab’s strict interpretation of Islamic Law. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

And thus began a military campaign that would shake the Arabian Peninsula to its core. The Wahhabi faith provided Ibn Sa’ud with the justification he needed to raid and conquer nearby settlements. Though these settlements were Islamic (and traditional Islamic law prohibits Islamic states from attacking each other), the Wahhabi doctrine viewed all non-Wahhabists as infidels and not true Muslims. It was thus that Ibn Sa’ud found a legitimate purpose to bring the nearby settlements under his control, to spread “true Islam” to the infidels. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

The Wahhabists were indiscriminate in their killings of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. They soon garnered a reputation as brutal and fanatical warriors. These Wahhabist warriors were described as being so fanatical that they had little regard for their own lives … their sole purpose, it seemed, was to kill the enemy. By the time of his death in 1765, Ibn Sa’ud had managed to gain control over most of the region and had spread Wahhabism to those conquered lands. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab died in 1792 but the spread of Wahhabism continued under the leadership of Ibn Sa’ud’s son, Abd al Aziz. Abd al Aziz continued the Wahhabi campaign and managed to sack the Shia holy city of Karbala and Sunni towns in Hijaz. The Wahhabists were brutal in their treatment of captured lands and brought destruction upon those who had opposed them. In the early 1800’s, the Wahhabi army even managed to gain control of Mecca and Medina. Viewing the acts of commemorating dead holy men and praying to saints as unholy acts, the Wahhabists destroyed monuments and gravesites in the holy cities. By doing this, they sought to imitate the Muslim prophet Muhammad’s smashing of pagan symbols when he returned to Mecca in 628. Access to the holy sites in Medina and Mecca were severely limited to outsiders. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

Shortly after the capture of Mecca, Abd al Aziz died. His son, Sa’ud, assumed leadership of the army but also died shortly after. Sa’ud’s son, Abd Allah ibn Sa’ud was then left in charge of the movement. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

The majority of Muslims were appalled and horrified at the brutal tactics used by the Wahhabists. Furthermore, the wanton destruction of what was to them holy sites and monuments incensed the overall Muslim community. It was then that the Ottoman Turks, one of the most powerful forces in Islam at the time, united with Muslim forces in Egypt to launch a bloody retaliation against the Wahhabists. Facing such an overwhelming force, the Wahhabists didn’t stand a chance. They immediately lost control of Mecca and Media and by 1818 had lost control of the majority of their territories. They were left a mere shamble of their previous power. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

The Wahhabists managed to make a slight comeback by 1833, but were once again beaten back. By 1889, the Wahhabi forces were annihilated and the Sa’ud family had fled to Kuwait for refuge. Many hoped that this final victory over the Wahhabi forces would mark the end of the extremist religion once and for all. However, the Sa’ud family would find an unlikely ally in Britain. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

By 1920, the Sa’ud family and their Wahhabi forces had built themselves back up. In 1927, the British, who at the time controlled much of the Arabian Peninsula, saw the Sa’ud family as allies from their WWI fight against the Turks, who were allied with Germany. The British signed a treaty with the Sa’ud family in which the Sa’uds assumed control over the Gulf sheikdoms. In 1932, the Sa’uds gave this land the name “Saudi Arabia.” And so was born the Wahhabist kingdom that bears the same name to this very day. (Ahmed; Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Haykel; Hisham; Metz, Kuwait; Metz, Saudi)

Beliefs and Doctrines of Wahhabi Islam

With his strict Hanbali upbringing and militant nature, it comes as no surprise that al-Wahhab’s teachings espoused a very extremist interpretation of the Quran. In addition to supporting strict and uncompromising societal obedience to Shariah Law (Anon., Wahhabism), Wahhabi Islam has additional rules and beliefs that set it apart from other forms of Islam. Some of these doctrines are:

True Muslims – The only true Muslims are those who follow the teachings of al-Wahhab. All other “Muslims” are non-believers and infidels. (Anon., Wahhabism; Cline; Haykel; Lopez; Metz, Saudi)

Tahwid (the essential oneness of God) - Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab championed the notion that people must never, under any circumstances, question the essential oneness of God. He took this notion to its extreme by claiming that prayer or observance to any saints or holy men was a form of raising up human figures to the level of God’s power. His belief was that the observance and honoring of the dead, saints, and/or angels detracted from the complete subservience one must feel towards God and only God. Wahhabi Islam thus bans any prayer to saints and dead loved ones, pilgrimages to tombs and special mosques, religious festivals celebrating saints, the honoring of the Muslim prophet Muhammad’s birthday, and even prohibits the use of gravestones when burying the dead. (Anon., Wahhabism; Bijlefeld; Cline; Metz, Saudi)

Any Muslim who does not follow these rules is to be considered an infidel (Anon., Wahhabism; Lopez). In the mind of the Wahhabist, this automatically places the far majority of Muslims, who indeed do celebrate their prophet Mohammad’s birthday and do mention him and various saints in prayer, into the category of non-Muslim infidel. It was thus that al-Wahhab made it a point to destroy all Muslim shrines that he came upon in conquered territories. Upon conquering the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina, al-Wahhab even attack the prophet Mohammad’s gravestone and shrine. In his own fanatical mind, al-Wahhab compared this to the prophet Muhammad's destruction of pagan idols when he reentered Mecca in 628. (Haykel)

Bayah (the oath of allegiance) – According to al-Wahhab’s teachings, all Muslims must individually pledge their allegiance to a Muslim leader. As long as this leader follows the laws of Islam (as determined by Wahhabi Islam) completely, the individual must give him his unquestionable allegiance. The Wahhabist must make this pledge to ensure his redemption by God after death. The purpose of the bayah is to merge religion and politics into one, ensuring that all Muslims dedicate their lives to following a “pure” leader who upholds all the tenets of Islam while at the same time ensuring that every leader must follow the laws of Islam completely. The Muslim community is thus to become the living embodiment of God’s laws and dictates. It is the responsibility of the leader to ensure that all people who live under his control know and follow the laws of God. (Metz, Saudi)

Conformity – Wahhabi Islam demands conformity. All people must dress similarly (you may notice in Saudi Arabia, most men wear the same white cloths), behave similarly, pray at the same time, use the same rituals in prayer, and speak in a similar manner. Adherence to the “true faith” is demonstrable in physical and tangible ways. The Wahhabists believe that they can judge a person’s faith by observing his actions and level of conformity to the Islamic ways. It is thus the responsibility of each Wahhabist to constantly observe his neighbors and friends in search of unholy actions and behavior. (Metz, Saudi; Mortimer)

The Struggle against Jahiliyya – Taken literally, the word Jahiliyya is a reference to a state of barbarism and ignorance. But al-Wahhab used it in a different context. In Wahhabi Islam, all societies that do not follow the true ways of Islam are considered to be in a state of Jahiliyya. All “infidels” are Jahili. Used in this context, Jahiliyya can more accurately be described as a representation of what Wahhabists consider to be the unholy, polytheistic, barbaric, corrupt, and evil state of Arabia before the coming of Islam. Jahiliyya is a representation of the culture that Mohammad fought against and destroyed with the inception of Islam. By so closely comparing their struggle against Jahiliyya with Mohammad’s fight against the polytheists of his time, Wahhabists see the struggle as one of the most holy actions they can take. (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi)

According to al-Wahhab, it is the duty of all true Muslims to fight Jahiliyya and the Jahili. Though conversion to “true Islam” is an option, Wahhabists are permitted by their doctrine to “rob, murder, and sexually violate” Jahili (Lopez). We can find an example of Wahhabi Islam’s brutal treatment of what they consider to be Jahili in the gruesome beheadings of such people as Paul Johnson, Daniel Pearl, Nick Berg, etc. . (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi)

Wahhabists also use many verses from the Quran to support their views on the struggle against Jahiliyya. Two verses commonly used by Wahhabists as justification for their battles are: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah ... until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection," (Quran 9:29) and “fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah" (Quran 8:39). (Olasky)

One indication of the strict standards that Wahhabists apply to societies can be found in their current view of the Saudi government. Even though Saudi Arabia’s government is by Wahhabi standards Islamic in almost every way, the fact that they allowed “infidels” onto the holy land after the first gulf War, in the eyes of many Wahhabi Clerics, made the Saudi Arabian government Jahiliyya. Some radical Wahhabi proponents such as Osama Bin Laden now even call for the overthrowing of that government. (Haykel; Phares)

Original Grandeur of Islam - Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab believed that the Islam of his time was not Islam at all. His contention was that the original purity of Muhammad’s teachings and the Quran were watered down and greatly altered from their original form. According to his views, the more time that passed after the writing of the Quran, the more unknowledgeable Muslim scholars got about its true meaning. It is thus that al-Wahhab believed in the original grandeur of Islam. He preached that the Islamic community should return to a strict interpretation of the principles enunciated by the Prophet Muhammad. Al-Wahhab accepted only the authority of the Quran and Sunna along with the issues clearly settled by early jurists. All later reinterpretation of issues and the Quran were to be rejected. Islam would return to the form it had taken shortly after the time of Muhammad. Wahhabists do not believe in reinterpreting issues of Islamic law that were already settled at that time. (Cline; Hisham; Metz, Saudi)

With this strong stance against any reinterpretation of Islamic law issues already settled, Wahhabi Islam leaves absolutely no room for any reform (Cline; Hisham; Metz, Saudi). Wahhabists are thus left with customs and beliefs from ages long ago. Among some of these issues that may not be reinterpreted and reformed are:

1) Women’s rights – Women have almost no rights in Wahhabi culture. They are forced to dress in certain ways (usually covered from head to toe in either black or blue), are not allowed to drive, may not speak, not allowed in public without a male chaperone, have no custody of their children, and so on. (Ahmed; Mortimer)

2) Dietary laws – Like many other Muslims, Wahhabists may not eat pork or drink wine. They do however follow even stricter guidelines in the form of not being able to drink any alcohol at all or consume any stimulants (i.e.- smoking cigarettes). (Ahmed; Mortimer)

3) Exhibition of Wealth - Wahhabists are forbidden to wear any jewelry, including gold, or silk clothing. (Ahmed; Mortimer)

4) Culture – Listening to music, dancing, pictures, paintings, loud laughter, and demonstrative crying are strictly prohibited. Men are not permitted to trim their beards shorter than a certain length and are not allowed to grow their hair longer than a certain length. (Ahmed; Mortimer)

5) Wahhabi Islam’s doctrine of original grandeur thus leaves the Wahhabist in a state of following customs and cultures of ancient times with no possibility of such customs and rules ever being reformed and changed. (Cline; Hisham; Metz, Saudi)

The Influence and effect of Wahhabi Islam

One can easily see the strict and uncompromising nature of Wahhabi Islam. Not only does it entail conformity among people, the observance of ancient customs, a strict and unforgiving interpretation of the Quran, but Wahhabi Islam also glorifies the struggle against Jahiliyya. This leaves the Wahhabist in a position of feeling that the majority of people are infidels and it is his duty to wage war against such Jahili. So it comes as no surprise that Wahhabi Islam has had a significant influence on the world.

Wahhabi Islam has a tremendous effect on all those who live under it’s auspices. The individual is first bombarded with the teachings of al-Wahhab as a young child. According to the rules of bayah, it is the responsibility of the leader to ensure that all people who live under his control know and follow the laws of God (Metz, Saudi). And so, the rulers will make religious education a large part of children’s lives. In Saudi Arabia, mandatory Wahhabi studies account for over 35% of most schools’ curriculums (Smith). Parents also have the option of sending their child to a madrassa, in which 100% of the studies are religious in nature. (Smith)

Wahhabi studies seek to indoctrinate the young children with religious extremism at an early age (Smith). One quote from the official school textbook used in many Saudi Arabian schools states:

"The last hour won't come before the Muslims would fight the Jews and the Muslims will kill them so Jews would hide behind rocks and trees. Then the rocks and tree would call: oh Muslim, oh servant of God! There is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only "Gharkad" tree, it is of Jews' trees." (Smith)

Wahhabi Islam views the majority of Muslims as infidels (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi). It supports violent struggle against all infidels and the young children are indoctrinated with these beliefs from an early age (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi; Smith). Ali al-Ahmed, a Muslim who grew up in Saudi Arabia, shares his experiences of the state funded schools:

“The religious curriculum in Saudi Arabia teaches you that people are basically two sides: Salafis [Wahhabis], who are the winners, the chosen ones, who will go to heaven, and the rest. The rest are Muslims and Christians and Jews and others.

“They are either kafirs, who are deniers of God, or mushrak, putting gods next to God, or enervators, that's the lightest one. The enervators of religion who are they call the Sunni Muslims who ... for instance, celebrate Prophet Mohammed's birthday, and do some stuff that is not accepted by Salafis.

“And all of these people are not accepted by Salafi as Muslims. As I said, "claimant to Islam." And all of these people are supposed to be hated, to be persecuted, even killed.

“Bin Laden learned this in Saudi Arabia. He didn't learn it in the moon. That message that Bin Laden received, it still is taught in Saudi Arabia. And if he dies, and this policy or curriculum stays, we will have other bin Ladens.” (Smith)

In this culture, young children are taught that anyone who is not a Wahhabist is a Jahili and is supposed to be “hated” and “persecuted” (Smith). It becomes clear why terrorist organizations are able to find so many recruits. Recruits are being raised in Saudi Arabia and indoctrinated by the school system (Smith). It is no coincidence that 15 of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian.

The environment in which the child grows into a man is also one that leaves no other option open except conformity and religious extremism. The entire student body dresses and behaves in a similar manner. There is no music to entertain the young teenager in his spare time. There are no school dances. There is no mingling with the opposite sex. There are no opportunities to find creative outlets. The young man is left with no other tangible alternative but to turn to Wahhabism as the driving force in his life. Wahhabism teaches the young man hate and intolerance, which become molded into his psyche. (Ahmed; Metz, Saudi; Mortimer)

The Wahhabist is also taught to constantly observe his neighbors and friends in search of unholy actions and behavior (Metz, Saudi; Mortimer). He is also aware of the fact that his own actions are being observed. The constant presence of Mutawwiin, “enforcers of public morals” who roam around the towns and cities in search of anyone who violates the cultural rules of Wahhabism (i.e.- someone playing music, not praying at the right time, someone with a beard that is too short, etc), help to sink into the Wahhabist’s psyche the notion that he constantly has to be on the lookout (Metz, Saudi; Mortimer). He is in a constant state of having to prove himself and thus acts in an even more devout manner.

We can clearly see that Wahhabi Islam has a huge influence on the individuals who live in such a society. They have little choice but to turn to the extreme and intolerant teachings of Wahhabi Islam as the only viable outlet to their energy. The individual who lives in a truly Wahhabi society is one who is indoctrinated in extremism from an early age.

Wahhabi Islam’s influence on culture is also a noticeable one. Al-Wahhab’s teachings support a drive towards extreme conformity (Metz, Saudi; Mortimer). And so we find Wahhabi culture to be severely lacking in individuality. Everybody dresses, behaves, and even prays in a similar manner (Mortimer). One could easily recognize the traditional and plain white garment worn by almost every man in Saudi Arabia.

Wahhabi Islam’s concept of original grandeur makes its effects known in culture. With the ancient jurists banning music, loud laughter, dancing, alcohol, and even paintings, (Ahmed; Hisham; Mortimer) the Wahhabi artistic and entertainment culture is a bland and boring one. There is little that can truly be called “culture” in Wahhabi society. It is mostly tradition and rules that must be abided by.

Another aspect of culture that Wahhabi Islam has had an influence on is the treatment of women (Ahmed). In this day and age, women in Wahhabi culture are still treated very poorly. They are forced to dress from head to toe in either black or blue garment, are not allowed to drive, may not speak unless spoken too, are not allowed in public without a male chaperone, have no custody of their children, and are even subjected to beatings from the Mutawwiin (Ahmed; Hisham; Mortimer).

Wahhabi culture dictates the mandatory pledging of an unquestionable allegiance to one’s ruler, bayah (Metz, Saudi). It would seem as though after stripping people of any true form of culture, Wahhabism also strips them of any sense of ownership of their own body and mind. By pledging the allegiance, they give up that last bastion of control over their destiny.

Wahhabism has had a significant, yet unfortunate, influence on culture by stifling the creative arts, treating women badly, annihilating any sense of individuality/personal worth, and driving its people to a form of extreme conformity.

One need not look past the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 to realize the influence and effect Wahhabi Islam has had on the rest of the world. The extremist religion has indoctrinated hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Muslims into a system of hate and violence (Alexiev). With its glorification of violent struggle against Jahiliyya (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi) and the millions of extremists it has created (Alexiev), it should come as no surprise that Wahhabi extremists have been waging a war of religion since the time of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab himself.

There has not been a time in its existence that Wahhabi Islam was not in some form or another at war with what it considers infidels. The origins and history of Wahhabi Islam, described earlier in this essay, show the violent and brutal nature it took before the formation of Saudi Arabia. Groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood of the 1940-50’s, Al-Jihad and Gamaa Islamiya of the 1970-80’s, The Front for National Salvation in Algeria, the Taliban and Mujahideen that fought the Soviet forces in Afghanistan, al Qaeda, etc have kept the violent Wahhabist jihad against what they consider to be Jahiliyya alive to this very day (Ahmed; Alexiev; Cline; Smith; Hardy). The violent killing of “infidels” is an influence of Wahhabi Islam that has haunted the rest of the world.

The United States of America has been thrust into a global war against terror. We fought the Taliban in Afghanistan and are now in Iraq. This is no doubt an effect of Osama Bin Laden’s Wahhabi theology (Cline; Haykel; Smith; Hardy). But we are not the only ones who have felt the sting of Wahhabi terrorism. Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Chechnya, and Bosnia are just a few of the other countries to feel the wrath of Wahhabists (Alexiev). The war against terrorism will be a long and hard war indeed.

The doctrines of Wahhabi Islam are playing another role in this war … for they are influencing the culture of war itself. Wahhabists are permitted by their doctrine to “rob, murder, and sexually violate” Jahili (Lopez). Wahhabi extremists are taught from a very young age that all “non-believers” are worthless and subject to persecution and death (Cline; Idris; Lopez; Smith). This extremist Wahhabist view of “infidels” has led the terrorists to use gruesome and hateful methods. On September 11, mass quantities of innocent civilians were killed. And yet this would mean nothing to them, for the civilians were merely Jahili (Smith). The lives of civilians are normally valued and protected in times of war. Wahhabi Islam influenced a major change in those values of war. It is now permissible for our enemies to slaughter and even behead civilians (Smith). Violent Jihad against the “infidels” is not only permissible to the Wahhabist; it is mandatory (Alexiev).

Wahhabists and the Saudi government continue to fund Wahhabi madrassas worldwide. A recent figure estimates that the Saudi government alone has spent over 70 billion dollars funding such extremist schools (Alexiev).

The full influence of Wahhabi Islam has yet to be felt by the world. With so many extremists being churned out of Saudi Arabia and its madrassas worldwide, things only appear to be getting worse. The real solution would be to implement some major changes in Saudi Arabia itself. Though some minor changes have been taking place (i.e.-they are cooperating with us more on arresting terrorists), the real changes that need to be made are not ones that Saudi Arabia would be willing to take by itself. For such changes would involve altering the very nature of Wahhabism itself. The Saudi clerics would not stand for such meddling by their own government. So we are unfortunately stuck in this hard place of having to fight terrorists in far away lands with no real end in sight.

Works Cited:

1) Alexiev, Alex. WAHHABISM: STATE-SPONSORED EXTREMISM WORLDWIDE. Testimony at the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security, June 2003. http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/congress/2003_h/030626-alexiev.htm

2) Anonymous. Justifying Wahhabism: The relationship between Muhammad bin Abdul-Wahhab and Ibn Taymiyah. Islamic Web. http://islamicweb.com/beliefs/creed/wahhab.htm

3) Anonymous. The Rise of Political Islam : Wahhabism and Neo-Salafism. The Media Guide to Islam: A Journalist’s Guide to Covering Islam. http://mediaguidetoislam.sfsu.edu/intheworld/04a_therise.htm

4) Anonymous. Wahhabism. Nation Master Online Encyclopedia, June 2004. http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Wahhabism

5) Bijlefeld, Willem. Wahhabism: General Information. BELIEVE Religious Information Source. http://mb-soft.com/believe/txo/wahhabis.htm

6) Cline, Austin. Wahhabism and Wahhabi Muslims: Profile and History of Wahhabi Islam. About.com, Religion and Spirituality. http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/islam/blfaq_islam_wahhab.htm

7) Idris, Jafar Shaikh. Characteristics of 'Abd Al-Wahhab's Fundamentalism. Islamic Awakening Foundation. http://www.islamicawakening.com/viewarticle.php?articleID=1073&

8) Hardy, Roger. Analysis: Inside Wahhabi Islam. BBC News, September 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1571144.stm

9) Haykel, Bernard. Radical Salafism: Osama's ideology. Canadian Society of Muslims Online Library, 2001. http://muslim-canada.org/binladendawn.html

10) Hisham, Muhammad. Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab. Naqshbandi Sufi Way Website, Febuary 1998. http://www.naqshbandi.org/ottomans/wahhabi/abdulwahhab.htm

11) Lopez, Kathryn Jean. The Good & the Bad: Stephen Schwartz on Islam and Wahhabism. National Review, November 2002. http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory111802.asp

12) Metz, Helen Chapin. Kuwait: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1993. http://www.exploitz.com/Kuwait-Kuwait-cg.php

13) Metz, Helen Chapin. Saudi Arabia: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1992. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/loc/sa/saud_wahhabi.htm

14) Mortimer, Louis. Saudi Arabia: Wahhabi Theology. Country Data. http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11589.html

15) Olasky, Marvin. Islam for terrorists. World on the Web Magazine, October 2001. http://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/10-27-01/cover_5.asp

16) Phares, Walid. Wahabi vs. Wahabi. Front Page Magazine, June 2004. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13693

17) Smith, Martin. Saudi Time Bomb? PBS Frontline, 2001. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saudi/interviews/


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: jihad; wahhabiislam; wahhabism
I wrote this a couple weeks ago. Hope you find it interesting. I think it's important to know who we're fighting in this war against terrorism and that the Saudi's are really nothing close to an ally
1 posted on 07/17/2004 10:56:57 AM PDT by StevenAU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

bookmark


2 posted on 07/17/2004 11:06:01 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: StevenAU

Know thy enemy bump!


4 posted on 07/17/2004 11:38:24 AM PDT by True Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU
"So we are unfortunately stuck in this hard place of having to fight terrorists in far away lands with no real end in sight."

What a terrible thought. I refuse to accept it, so consider this:

Even if Wahabististas were all exterminated overnight, a new babbatista pack would ooze from the nest within 24 hours. So what's the solution? Certainly not killing all islamists. But banishing them from civilized countries and putting them in quarantine for a few hundred years would give the world a breather and allow time for the 'lust for blood and virgins' gene to mutate into obscurity.

Who knows? Maybe they'll overcome their sexual repression and start treating their women folk properly.

The Cain Sanction will work.

The only thing that keeps islam going is the fact they are mobile and have their pick of infidels for their blood sacrifices. How long would islam last in isolation? Not long, I'm sure.

5 posted on 07/17/2004 11:38:30 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Your article also clearly indicates that not all Muslims are to be put in this category.

In fact, MOST Muslims are NOT Wahabi.

Freepers need to be more careful about making this kind of
distinction.


6 posted on 07/17/2004 11:40:40 AM PDT by newberger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

an apology for all the "good" muslims.


7 posted on 07/17/2004 11:42:37 AM PDT by eleven_eleven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU
Very enlightening.

Welcome to FreeRepublic.

8 posted on 07/17/2004 11:54:08 AM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; blam; SierraWasp; GeronL; SunkenCiv; Dog; Cap Huff; Coop; ...
Thanks for sharing this with us and welcome to Free Republic.

This is about the best , historical rendering of the origins and the implications of what is yet to come , I have seen.....
9 posted on 07/17/2004 1:14:30 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Thank you for the kind words, everyone. They are much appreciated! I'm currently working on a follow-up essay that continues where this one left off (I was rushed in writing this as it was due the next day for Hum-160 class). I'll definitely make sure to post it on this forum when it's ready.


10 posted on 07/17/2004 2:15:18 PM PDT by StevenAU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

How is your leftist professor gonna respond to this?

Please let us know...even if he is not a leftist....


11 posted on 07/17/2004 2:26:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The professor was definitely not a leftist and gave me a 99% on the paper (took a point off from some grammatical errors). He said he enjoyed the paper asked if he could keep a copy of the paper for himself ... I was very honored.


12 posted on 07/17/2004 3:25:36 PM PDT by StevenAU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Excellent, and I had about decided all non science professors had gone totally leftist on us.


13 posted on 07/17/2004 3:39:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You're welcome, but, uh, I didn't do nothin'...
14 posted on 07/17/2004 4:26:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The thanks, was meant for Steven and I just thought the others on the list might be interested in seeing this piece.


15 posted on 07/17/2004 5:11:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Interesting piece. I noticed you mentioned the Sufis. They are to Wahabiism as ant-matter is to matter. The term "whirling dervishes" is based on western adventurer's accounts of persian sufi dancers in a state of ecstasy.

Its to bad the ME and persia couldn't have latched on to a more sensible side of Islam. Instead they of have chosen the road of self-destruction with Wahabiism. This barbaric and ruthless sect of Islam is growing like wildfire. Given the educational level and cultural tenants of the Arab and Persian worlds, its not suprising that this sect thrives.

This is a wonderful posting. I hope kids in highschools and colleges are being given a realistic picture of the enemy. We have the technology and the fire power to destroy this part of the world. There is a legitmate argument that in the right to self-preservation the taking of life is acceptable. However, most rational human beings will try and avoid the senseless destruction of human life. Even the kamikazes had millitary targets and the were HVTs at that. the wahabis throw away their own lives in the pursuit of destroying innocent men, women and children. We have a ruthless enemy and the old proxim "know thy enemy" counts as much today as it ever has. Excellent post.


16 posted on 07/17/2004 5:37:13 PM PDT by ChinaThreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks for the ping, that was a good article.

--Boot Hill

17 posted on 07/17/2004 7:17:18 PM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newberger
Freepers need to be more careful about making this kind of distinction.

Maybe we'll mull it over if/when we ever hear any "muslim outcry" over the radicals.

Hear anything?....So far the silence is deafening.

18 posted on 07/17/2004 7:22:38 PM PDT by ErnBatavia ("Dork"; a 60's term for a 60's kinda guy: JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

FYI


19 posted on 07/17/2004 8:18:36 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU
Viewing the acts of commemorating dead holy men and praying to saints as unholy acts, the Wahhabists destroyed monuments and gravesites in the holy cities.

What are their thoughts on the Kabba stone/monument in Mecca?

20 posted on 07/17/2004 8:23:58 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
I didn't find much info on that, but have this snippet from an article titled "origins of Wahhabism": he was a Shi'i. He positioned himself towards the Kabba and started to pray, and suddenly a soldier rushed towards him, as if he had been monitoring his moves, and kicked him while he was in a position of prostration. The man fell on his back unconscious, then the soldier started beating him and cursing him. I felt so sorry for the old man and thought he might have been killed and so I shouted at the soldier, "You must not do that! Why did you beat him while he was praying?" He rebuked me and said, "You be quiet and do not interfere, or else I will do to you what I have just done to him!" I realized that the soldier was full of aggression, so I avoided him, but I felt angry at myself for not being able to help those who are unjustly treated, and felt angry at the Saudis who treat the people as they like without any check or accountability for their actions. There were some visitors who witnessed the attack, but all that they could do was to say, "There is no power or might but in Allah." Others said, "He deserves what he got because he was praying by the graves." I could not control myself, so I said to that particular person, "Who told you that we must not pray by the graves ? He answered, ' The Messenger of Allah (saw) prevented us from doing so." I replied angrily. You are lying about the Messenger of Allah." I became aware of the dangerous situation and feared that some of the visitors might call the soldier to attack me, so I said gently, if the Messenger of Allah prevented us from praying by the graves, why should millions of pilgrims and visitors disobey him and commit a sin by praying by the graves of the Prophet (saw), Abu Bakr and Umar in the Holy Mosque of the Prophet and in many other mosques around the Islamic world.
21 posted on 07/17/2004 8:50:54 PM PDT by StevenAU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Nice work.


22 posted on 07/17/2004 8:55:21 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin; nuconvert

Heads up!


23 posted on 07/17/2004 8:55:47 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

WoW. What timing. I just finished reading the older Kabbani piece on Islamic Extremism, and prior to that,....1979 Flashback: Whitehouse Orders CIA to Survey Moslems Worldwide ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173489/posts ).
Thanks.


24 posted on 07/17/2004 9:07:22 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Some people can tell time by looking at the sun, but I've never been able to make out the numbers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I just forwarded the link to this piece to the ISCA for their perusal.

Let's see if I get a response from Kabbani.


25 posted on 07/17/2004 9:09:39 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Bump for the morning


26 posted on 07/17/2004 9:09:54 PM PDT by Valin (Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Bookmarked and bumped. Brilliant, brilliant article. It explains some things I previously didn't understand, particularly the jihadist statements about settling with the other Moslems who had abandoned the faith when the West was subdued.


27 posted on 07/17/2004 9:13:15 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Hey, I listened to your interview today on FR Radio. I'd been meaning to for quite a while. Very good.

Oops. sent you the wrong URL. This is the one I
meant.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173467/posts


28 posted on 07/17/2004 9:15:08 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Some people can tell time by looking at the sun, but I've never been able to make out the numbers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Which interview?


29 posted on 07/17/2004 9:16:01 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Hoffman. Very informative.


30 posted on 07/17/2004 9:17:07 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Some people can tell time by looking at the sun, but I've never been able to make out the numbers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: zimdog

pong


31 posted on 07/17/2004 9:40:09 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Some people can tell time by looking at the sun, but I've never been able to make out the numbers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Interesting.

I've read that the Wahabbis wouldn't object to the destruction of the Kabba, but can't remember where I read that.

If true, nuking Mecca, as some have proposed, might not take the wind out of their sails.


32 posted on 07/17/2004 9:40:29 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

BTTT


33 posted on 07/17/2004 11:07:31 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

If I may I'd like to recomend
"the Two Faces Of Islam"
the house of Sa'ud from tradition to terroe
By Stephen Schwartz

While I don't agree with eveything he writes in this book, he really nails it when it comes to the Saudis.

Also a Saudi blogger
The Religious Policeman
A Saudi man's diary of life in the "Magic Kingdom", where the Religious Police ensure that everything remains as it was in the Middle Ages.
http://muttawa.blogspot.com/


34 posted on 07/18/2004 6:59:59 AM PDT by Valin (Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

if true nuking Mecca, as some have proposed, might not take the wind out of their sails.

1 I doubt it's true as they are the ones in control of it.
2 Say we do, what happens the next day? There's a fighting chance that the entire Islamic world(all 1+BILLION) rallies to OBL and his gang of thugs. Then you'd get to see what a real religious war is like.


35 posted on 07/18/2004 7:42:21 AM PDT by Valin (Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: GWTexan

You think this war isn't already 1 billion vs the world?

No, I know it.


37 posted on 07/18/2004 4:18:28 PM PDT by Valin (Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: GWTexan

Then why are you worried about them being mobalized?

I'm not, unless some idiot idiot starts dropping nukes on Mecca (talk about a present on a golden platter to OBL)

They already are going to kill millions of us.

Who are the "they" that you speak of?


39 posted on 07/18/2004 4:31:14 PM PDT by Valin (Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator

To: StevenAU
Very nice paper. It isn't, of course, the particular doctrine that is so important as it is that this one is funded by the charity that is one of the Five Pillars of Islam, and that its benefactors are among the wealthiest individuals the world has ever known. Were it not for that the Wahhabis would be merely another anachronistic death cult, easily slapped down by the majority ulema whose doctrines they subvert.

It can't last. Their only hope of continuing their current state level of support is to hand the crown to Nayef (ibn Abdul Aziz al-Saud, to give his full name) over Crown Prince Abdullah. Nayef is the Interior Minister, who has already once attempted to use his Wahhabi connections to assume the status of heir apparent. He failed. He is also not only connected with the general Wahhabi infrastructure, but with its evil splinter al-Qaeda as well.

IMHO, either he or Abdullah will survive the next five years, but not both.

41 posted on 07/18/2004 4:42:21 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

From the website of Apostates of Islam:
"It is our belief that Islamic terrorism will not be eliminated unless and until the ideology behind it is not exposed and eradicated. This is what we intend to do."

We left Islam

Who we are:

We are ex-Muslims. Some of us were born and raised in Islam and some of us had converted to Islam at some moment in our lives. We were taught never to question the truth of Islam and to believe in Allah and his messenger with blind faith. We were told that Allah would forgive all sins but the sin of disbelief (Quran 4:48 and 4:116). But we committed the ultimate sin of thinking and questioned the belief that was imposed on us and we came to realize that far from being a religion of truth, Islam is a hoax, it is hallucination of a sick mind and nothing but lies and deceits.

What we believe:

Some of us have embraced other religions but most of us have simply left Islam without believing in any other religion. We believe in humanity. We believe that humans do not need to follow a religion to be good. All we need to follow is the Golden Rule. All we have to do is to treat others they way we expect to be treated. This is the essence of all the goodness. All good religious teachings stem from this eternal principle. This is the ultimate guidance humanity need. This is the Golden Rule.

Why Mohammed was not a prophet:

One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives and their “right hand possessions” (Quran 33:50) He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way. Muhammad was a narcissist like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.

Why Quran is not from God:

Muhammad produced no miracles and when pressed he claimed that his miracle is the Quran. Yet a cursory look at the Quran reveals that this book is full of errors. Quran is replete with scientific heresies, historic blunders, mathematical mistakes, logical absurdities, grammatical errors and ethical fallacies. It is badly compiled and it contradicts itself. There is nothing intelligent in this book let alone miraculous. Muhammad challenged people to produce a “Surah like it” or find an error therein, yet Muslims would kill anyone who dares to criticize it. In such a climate of hypocrisy and violence truth is the first casualty.

What is our goal?

We are apostates of Islam. We denounce Islam as a false doctrine of hate and terror. However we are not against Muslims who are our own kin and relatives. We do not advocate hate and violence. Muslims are the main victims of Islam. Our goal is to educate them and let them see the truth. We are against Islam and not the Muslims. We strive to bring the Muslims into the fold of humanity. Eradicate Islam so our people can be liberated, so they can prosper and break away from the pillory of Islam. We would like to see Islamic countries dedicate more time to science and less time to Quran and Sharia. We would like to see them prosper and contribute to human civilization. We would like to see the draconian laws of Islam eliminated and people are treated humanely. We strive for freedom of beliefs, for equality of gender and for oneness of mankind.

Mankind’s biggest challenge:

Today the humanity is facing a great danger. Islamic fundamentalism is on the rise and the hatred is brewing in the minds of millions of Muslims. This hatred must be contained or there would be disastrous consequences. We believe that the education is the only answer. Muslim intellectuals must realize that Islam is a false doctrine and they must let the rest of Islamic world know the truth. Islam is a religion that thrives on the arrogant assumption that it is the most logical, the most scientific and the most perfect religion. While the fact is that it is the stupidest doctrine — the most backward and absurd belief. Once the truth about Islam becomes common knowledge, it will be weakened and the Islamic fanaticism will lose its fangs. Hundreds of billions of dollars are being expended to combat Islamic terrorism, yet no effort is made to contain the ideology behind this terrorism. It is our belief that Islamic terrorism will not be eliminated unless and until the ideology behind it is not exposed and eradicated. This is what we intend to do.

* * *

The Apostates of Islam

http://www.apostatesofislam.com/main.htm


42 posted on 07/18/2004 5:18:42 PM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GWTexan

They are all mooselimbs

mooselimbs, tell me did you think that one all by yourself?

What about Jamal S. Baadani?


43 posted on 07/18/2004 5:28:07 PM PDT by Valin (Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson