Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hourly Pay in U.S. Not Keeping Pace With Price Rises
NYTIMES ^ | 07/18/04 | EDUARDO PORTER

Posted on 07/17/2004 1:31:26 PM PDT by Pikamax

July 18, 2004 Hourly Pay in U.S. Not Keeping Pace With Price Rises By EDUARDO PORTER

he amount of money workers receive in their paychecks is failing to keep up with inflation. Though wages should recover if businesses continue to hire, three years of job losses have left a large worker surplus.

"There's too much slack in the labor market to generate any pressure on wage growth,'' said Jared Bernstein, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal research institution based in Washington. "We are going to need a much lower unemployment rate.'' He noted that at 5.6 percent, the national unemployment rate is still back at the same level as at the end of the recession in November 2001.

Even though the economy has been adding hundreds of thousands of jobs almost every month this year, stagnant wages could put a dent in the prospects for economic growth, some economists say. If incomes continue to lag behind the increase in prices, it may hinder the ability of ordinary workers to spend money at a healthy clip, undermining one of the pillars of the expansion so far.

Declining wages are likely to play a prominent role in the current presidential campaign. Growing employment has lifted President Bush's job approval ratings on the economy of late. According to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll, in mid-July, 42 percent of those polled approved of the president's handling of the economy, up from 38 percent in mid-March.

Yet Senator John Kerry, the likely Democratic presidential nominee, is pointing to lackluster wages as a telling weakness in the administration's economic track record. ``Americans feel squeezed between prices that are rising and incomes that are not,'' Mark Mellman, a pollster for the campaign, said in a memorandum last month.

On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that hourly earnings of production workers - nonmanagement workers ranging from nurses and teachers to hamburger flippers and assembly-line workers - fell 1.1 percent in June, after accounting for inflation. The June drop, the steepest decline since the depths of recession in mid-1991, came after a 0.8 percent fall in real hourly earnings in May.

Coming on top of a 12-minute drop in the average workweek, the decline in the hourly rate last month cut deeply into workers’ pay. In June, production workers took home $525.84 a week, on average. After accounting for inflation, this is about $8 less than they were pocketing last January. And it is the lowest level of weekly pay since October 2001.

On its own, the decline in workers’ wages is unlikely to derail the recovery. Though they account for some 80 percent of the work force, they contribute much less to spending. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Economy.com, a research firm, noted that households in the bottom half of the income distribution account only one-third of consumer spending, while those in the top half account for two-thirds.

Nonetheless, coming after the bonanza of the second half of the 1990’s, the first period of sustained real wage growth since the 1970’s, the current slide in earnings is a big blow for the lower middle class. Moreover, the absence of lower income households could also weigh on overall economic growth ­ putting a lid on the mass market and skewing consumption toward high-end products.

"There’s a bit of a dichotomy," said Ethan S. Harris, chief economist at Lehman Brothers. "Joe Six-Pack is under a lot of pressure. He got a lousy raise; he’s paying more for gasoline and milk. He’s not doing that great. But proprietors’ income is up. Profits are up. Home values are up. Middle income and upper income people are looking pretty good."

Tales of tight budgets at the bottom are springing up across the country. "I haven’t had a salary increase in two years, but the cost of living is going up," said Eric Lambert, 42, a father of three who earns $13 an hour as a security guard at 660 Madison Ave. in Manhattan.

Silvia Vides, 43, who earns $11 an hour in a union job as a housekeeper at the Universal City Sheraton hotel in Los Angeles, said, "Sometimes I don’t know how I pay the bills and food and rent." She has cut back on all nonessential expenditures and she is four months behind on payments on $4,000 in credit-card debt.

Their woes are a product of supply and demand for labor. From 1996 through 2000 when employers were hiring hand over fist, real hourly wages of ordinary workers rose by 7.5 percent. Those for leisure and hospitality workers rose 9.6 percent, and retail workers’ climbed 8.9 percent. The raises continued even as the economy slipped into recession in 2001 and businesses began to shed workers.

From 2001 to 2003, 2.4 million jobs were eliminated, as businesses sharply reduced their work forces, refusing to hire back even as demand started picking up. Over a million of these jobs have been regained this year. Yet with the lowest number of people employed as a share of the population since 1994, there is still a plentiful supply of unused laborers looking for jobs.

As the rise in energy prices in the earlier months of this year led to a rising inflation, pushing prices in June up 3.2 percent from the same month of last year, the lackluster job market has left workers in a position of weakness to demand more money.

"Since last November, we’ve had a pickup in hiring and a pickup in hours worked in virtually all of our businesses," said David Pittaway, a senior managing director at Castle Harlan, an equity investment company that owns everything from Burger King franchises to a shipping company.

But there is clearly still a lot of slack. When Castle Harlan advertised in the newspapers to fill 70 to 80 positions at a Morton’s restaurant it opened in early July in White Plains, 600 to 700 people showed up.

Ms. Vides in California ticks off the items of a more expensive cost of living. She pays $850 a month for a one-bedroom apartment in Panorama City, $25 more a month than last year. The cost of a bus pass rose $10, to $45 a month. The electricity bill is much higher and food costs more. "I’ve got to do miracles with my salary," she said.

So Ms. Vides said she is outraged that the hotels negotiating a new contract with her union are offering annual raises of 40 cents to 45 cents an hour each year for the next five years. The raise in 2004 would be about 4 percent, just enough to keep up with the 4 percent rise in prices in Los Angeles over the last year. "This is miserly," said Ms. Vides, who said the union wants $1.25 this year and $1.50 next.

Colleen Kareti, president of the Los Angeles hotel employers’ council, which represents the hotels, argued that negotiations had not yet gotten down to bargaining over wages. But she pointed out that times are hard for the hotel business, too. "It’s been pretty bad for the last three years. We’re nowhere near the levels of business where we were in 1998 through 2000," Ms. Kareti said. Some economists warn that if wages remain depressed for a long time they may end up weighing on the economy. "The recovery will likely continue on despite the travails of lower-income households, but it can not flourish," Mr. Zandi said.

So far, spending was fueled mostly by debt, as consumers took advantage of bedrock-low interest rates to whip out their credit cards and refinance their mortgages. But as interest rates rise to keep inflation in check, continued growth in consumer spending will depend more on jobs and wages.

Spending is still holding up, led by strong corporate profits as well as higher salaries and bonuses at the upper end of the job distribution. But the lagging earnings at the bottom end are making for a somewhat lopsided expansion.

The upper echelons of consumer spending, at places like Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom department stores, are reporting gangbuster business. "I’m surprised by how well we’ve sold high-priced fashion at this stage," said Pete Nordstrom, president of Nordstrom’s full-line stores. But the other end, sales at stores open at least a year at big-box discounters like Target and Wal-Mart have disappointed, while sales of used cars are declining year over year, government figures show. "We’re not seeing the traffic, not even the same volumes of sales calls," said Richard Cooper, new vehicle sales manager at Jones Ford in Charleston, S.C.

Wages at the bottom should eventually recover, as businesses continue hiring to meet growing demand. The question is how fast. The amount of money workers receive in their paychecks is failing to keep up with inflation. Though wages should recover if businesses continue to hire, three years of job losses have left a large worker surplus.

``There's too much slack in the labor market to generate any pressure on wage growth,'' said Jared Bernstein, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal research institution based in Washington. ``We are going to need a much lower unemployment rate.'' He noted that at 5.6 percent, the national unemployment rate is still back at the same level as at the end of the recession in November 2001.

Even though the economy has been adding hundreds of thousands of jobs almost every month this year, stagnant wages could put a dent in the prospects for economic growth, some economists say. If incomes continue to lag behind the increase in prices, it may hinder the ability of ordinary workers to spend money at a healthy clip, undermining one of the pillars of the expansion so far.

Declining wages are likely to play a prominent role in the current presidential campaign. Growing employment has lifted President Bush's job approval ratings on the economy of late. According to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll, in mid-July, 42 percent of those polled approved of the president's handling of the economy, up from 38 percent in mid-March.

Yet Senator John Kerry, the likely Democratic presidential nominee, is pointing to lackluster wages as a telling weakness in the administration's economic track record. "Americans feel squeezed between prices that are rising and incomes that are not,'' Mark Mellman, a pollster for the campaign, said in a memorandum last month.

On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that hourly earnings of production workers - nonmanagement workers ranging from nurses and teachers to hamburger flippers and assembly-line workers - fell 1.1 percent in June, after accounting for inflation. The June drop, the steepest decline since the depths of recession in mid-1991, came after a 0.8 percent fall in real hourly earnings in May.

Coming on top of a 12-minute drop in the average workweek, the decline in the hourly rate last month cut deeply into workers’ pay. In June, production workers took home $525.84 a week, on average. After accounting for inflation, this is about $8 less than they were pocketing last January. And it is the lowest level of weekly pay since October 2001. On its own, the decline in workers’ wages is unlikely to derail the recovery. Though they account for some 80 percent of the work force, they contribute much less to spending. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Economy.com, a research firm, noted that households in the bottom half of the income distribution account only one-third of consumer spending, while those in the top half account for two-thirds.

Nonetheless, coming after the bonanza of the second half of the 1990’s, the first period of sustained real wage growth since the 1970’s, the current slide in earnings is a big blow for the lower middle class. Moreover, the absence of lower income households could also weigh on overall economic growth ­ putting a lid on the mass market and skewing consumption toward high-end products.

"There’s a bit of a dichotomy," said Ethan S. Harris, chief economist at Lehman Brothers. "Joe Six-Pack is under a lot of pressure. He got a lousy raise; he’s paying more for gasoline and milk. He’s not doing that great. But proprietors’ income is up. Profits are up. Home values are up. Middle income and upper income people are looking pretty good."

Tales of tight budgets at the bottom are springing up across the country. "I haven’t had a salary increase in two years, but the cost of living is going up," said Eric Lambert, 42, a father of three who earns $13 an hour as a security guard at 660 Madison Ave. in Manhattan.

Silvia Vides, 43, who earns $11 an hour in a union job as a housekeeper at the Universal City Sheraton hotel in Los Angeles, said, "Sometimes I don’t know how I pay the bills and food and rent." She has cut back on all nonessential expenditures and she is four months behind on payments on $4,000 in credit-card debt.

Their woes are a product of supply and demand for labor. From 1996 through 2000 when employers were hiring hand over fist, real hourly wages of ordinary workers rose by 7.5 percent. Those for leisure and hospitality workers rose 9.6 percent, and retail workers’ climbed 8.9 percent. The raises continued even as the economy slipped into recession in 2001 and businesses began to shed workers.

From 2001 to 2003, 2.4 million jobs were eliminated, as businesses sharply reduced their work forces, refusing to hire back even as demand started picking up. Over a million of these jobs have been regained this year. Yet with the lowest number of people employed as a share of the population since 1994, there is still a plentiful supply of unused laborers looking for jobs.

As the rise in energy prices in the earlier months of this year led to a rising inflation, pushing prices in June up 3.2 percent from the same month of last year, the lackluster job market has left workers in a position of weakness to demand more money.

"Since last November, we’ve had a pickup in hiring and a pickup in hours worked in virtually all of our businesses," said David Pittaway, a senior managing director at Castle Harlan, an equity investment company that owns everything from Burger King franchises to a shipping company.

But there is clearly still a lot of slack. When Castle Harlan advertised in the newspapers to fill 70 to 80 positions at a Morton’s restaurant it opened in early July in White Plains, 600 to 700 people showed up.

Ms. Vides in California ticks off the items of a more expensive cost of living. She pays $850 a month for a one-bedroom apartment in Panorama City, $25 more a month than last year. The cost of a bus pass rose $10, to $45 a month. The electricity bill is much higher and food costs more. "I’ve got to do miracles with my salary," she said.

So Ms. Vides said she is outraged that the hotels negotiating a new contract with her union are offering annual raises of 40 cents to 45 cents an hour each year for the next five years. The raise in 2004 would be about 4 percent, just enough to keep up with the 4 percent rise in prices in Los Angeles over the last year. "This is miserly," said Ms. Vides, who said the union wants $1.25 this year and $1.50 next.

Colleen Kareti, president of the Los Angeles hotel employers’ council, which represents the hotels, argued that negotiations had not yet gotten down to bargaining over wages. But she pointed out that times are hard for the hotel business, too. "It’s been pretty bad for the last three years. We’re nowhere near the levels of business where we were in 1998 through 2000," Ms. Kareti said.

Some economists warn that if wages remain depressed for a long time they may end up weighing on the economy. "The recovery will likely continue on despite the travails of lower-income households, but it can not flourish," Mr. Zandi said.

So far, spending was fueled mostly by debt, as consumers took advantage of bedrock-low interest rates to whip out their credit cards and refinance their mortgages. But as interest rates rise to keep inflation in check, continued growth in consumer spending will depend more on jobs and wages.

Spending is still holding up, led by strong corporate profits as well as higher salaries and bonuses at the upper end of the job distribution. But the lagging earnings at the bottom end are making for a somewhat lopsided expansion.

The upper echelons of consumer spending, at places like Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom department stores, are reporting gangbuster business. "I’m surprised by how well we’ve sold high-priced fashion at this stage," said Pete Nordstrom, president of Nordstrom’s full-line stores.

But the other end, sales at stores open at least a year at big-box discounters like Target and Wal-Mart have disappointed, while sales of used cars are declining year over year, government figures show. "We’re not seeing the traffic, not even the same volumes of sales calls," said Richard Cooper, new vehicle sales manager at Jones Ford in Charleston, S.C.

Wages at the bottom should eventually recover, as businesses continue hiring to meet growing demand. The question is how fast. "As unemployment slides down, more of the benefits of growth should flow to the working class," Mr. Bernstein said. "But not until we reach truly full employment are they likely to see their earnings rise at a level closer to that of productivity."

As unemployment slides down, more of the benefits of growth should flow to the working class," Mr. Bernstein said. "But not until we reach truly full employment are they likely to see their earnings rise at a level closer to that of productivity."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americanpoor; bologna; groceriescostlots; macncheese; minimum; pay; peanutbutter; poor; ramennoodles; salary; wage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2004 1:31:28 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Here we go with rat talking points, turning a recovery into a bad economy, just like turning Iraq into Vietnam. The rat media is shameless.

I suppose we'll start getting stories about homeless people now.


2 posted on 07/17/2004 1:34:06 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Do Chernobyl restaurants serve Curied chicken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"We are going to need a much lower unemployment rate.''

If it were at a -10% rate, Jared would still say the same I'm convinced, after all, to some if the glass is overflowing this would be seen as a problem just as they would see a problem with an empty glass.

As for the title of the article, well perhaps one should shoot for a position which is "exempt". LoL's!

3 posted on 07/17/2004 1:38:11 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
This guy needs a lesson in economics.

At any rate, why are we to believe what the Slimes says anyway? They're a party organ for the Democrats, and a discredited one at that.

4 posted on 07/17/2004 1:38:44 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
...the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal research institution based in Washington.

Good God, they actually used the adjective "liberal". I'm in shock.

5 posted on 07/17/2004 1:41:15 PM PDT by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Why the heck are you talking about "rat" talking points? Willie Green will take the latest "data" from the Economic Policy Institute and run with it. Anything to defeat Bush, remember?
6 posted on 07/17/2004 1:42:05 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Choosing one segment of the population provides a distorted picture of the economy as a whole.
7 posted on 07/17/2004 1:42:23 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
why are we to believe what the Slimes says anyway?

Apparently less and less are lately.

Considering the layoffs in THEIR field.

When threats are created at FR, it is for discussion and not to be taken as a promotion of acceptance. IMHO anyway.

8 posted on 07/17/2004 1:42:54 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP

Article sure to show up in the St.Pete Times (Bastard child of NYT)shortly


9 posted on 07/17/2004 1:45:19 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Willie Green will take the latest "data" from the Economic Policy Institute and run with it.

Usually to be stopped short of the scrimmage line! LoL's

10 posted on 07/17/2004 1:45:43 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Rising prices take the sting out of inflation if your product is rising faster than other prices. Oil and cattle seem to be keeping ahead so I love it.


11 posted on 07/17/2004 1:46:27 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

We're DOOMED! DOOMED!


12 posted on 07/17/2004 1:47:09 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Why the heck are you talking about "rat" talking points? Willie Green will take the latest "data" from the Economic Policy Institute and run with it. Anything to defeat Bush, remember?

<Nodding>

True... True...

</Nodding>


$710.96... The price of freedom.

13 posted on 07/17/2004 1:48:59 PM PDT by rdb3 (When I reached the fork in the road, I drove straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
You are so correct, I am ashamed to say my brother is an editor for the SP-Times and he is just left of Mao Se Tung.
I can't even talk with him.
14 posted on 07/17/2004 1:56:13 PM PDT by liberty_or_death24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Here's a book they are hawking on the "economic policy institute's" website. Who would have known?

Rethinking growth strategies

As state and local governments expand efforts to promote economic development, one increasingly popular technique for encouraging investment is the use of state and local tax cuts and tax incentives to lure businesses. In the EPI study Rethinking Growth Strategies, author Robert G. Lynch analyzes the existing research to show that state and local tax cuts and tax incentives largely fail to draw firms to a particular location, substantially improve local economic development, or stimulate job creation in a cost-effective manner. A more successful approach to economic growth may involve raising taxes in order to better provide essential public services such as schools, education, and health care.

15 posted on 07/17/2004 1:58:27 PM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Where's the

?

16 posted on 07/17/2004 2:04:06 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Neat graphic--- I like it better than the

Please let me know before you take it off webpages so I can put it on hypermart.

17 posted on 07/17/2004 2:43:14 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

The article says the difference between raises and inflation for a group of workers such as teachers, etc is a minus 1.1%.

If job creation means lots of my fellow men and women are now working, I can eat a 1.1% wage loss v. inflation. If present workers get greedy, then less money is available for new hires. The more participants in the money economy, the chance of raises for all is better.

I haven't had a raise in 3 years but I worked all through the downturn so I'm not unhappy.


18 posted on 07/17/2004 2:57:45 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

Thanks, I made it in flamingtext.com and uploaded it to my own server.


19 posted on 07/17/2004 3:06:56 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Willie Green

I doubt he'll dignify your comment with a response, but if you're going to talk about another FReeper, at least have the courtesy to ping him.


20 posted on 07/17/2004 3:12:27 PM PDT by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson