Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now America accuses Iran of complicity in World Trade Center attack
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | July 18, 2004 | Julian Coman

Posted on 07/17/2004 4:53:20 PM PDT by MadIvan

Iran gave free passage to up to 10 of the September 11 hijackers just months before the 2001 attacks and offered to co-operate with al-Qa'eda against the US, an American report will say this week.

The all-party report by the 9/11 Commission, set up by Congress in 2002, will state that Iran, not Iraq, fostered relations with the al-Qa'eda network in the years leading up to the world's most devastating terrorist attack.

The bipartisan commission has established that between eight and 10 of the September 11 hijackers, who had been based in Afghanistan, travelled through Iran between October 2000 and February 2001. The terrorists in question are believed to have been the "muscle" - hired to storm the aircraft cockpits and overpower crew and passengers.

Iranian officials were instructed not to harrass al-Qa'eda personnel as they crossed the border and, in some cases, not to stamp their passports.

According to testimony received by the commission - based on information from prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and about 100 electronic intercepts by the National Security Agency - an alliance of convenience was established between the Shia Muslim Iranian leadership and the Sunni terrorist organisation, well before September 11, 2001.

The report is expected to confirm the claim by Thomas Kean, its chairman, last month that "there were a lot more active [al-Qa'eda] contacts, frankly, with Iran and Pakistan, than there were with Iraq".

It will further inflame tensions between Washington and Teheran, where hardliners are threatening to restart its uranium enrichment programme, a key step towards building nuclear weapons.

A commission official, quoted in the latest edition of Time magazine, alleges that Iranian officials approached Osama bin Laden after the bombing of the USS Cole in 1999, proposing a joint strategy of attacks on US interests.

A preliminary report from commission staff, released last month, stated: "Bin Laden's representatives and Iranian officials discussed putting aside Shia-Sunni divisions to co-operate against the common enemy."

The offer is said to have been turned down by bin Laden, who was reluctant to alienate Sunni supporters in Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless, in the wake of September 11, Iran sheltered al-Qaeda militants fleeing Afghanistan.

The full report by the commission is also expected to endorse initial conclusions that al-Qa'eda may have been involved in the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers complex in Saudi Arabia, when 19 American servicemen were killed. The attack has long been blamed solely on Hizbollah, a Lebanese terrorist group backed by Iran.

Iran was declared part of an "axis of evil", along with Iraq and North Korea, by President George W. Bush in 2002. The report will add to pressure for Iran's theocratic rulers to be the first target of a re-elected Bush administration. Hawks within the administration want a concerted effort to overturn the regime by peaceful means.

Some Bush officials are privately contemplating a possible military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities before Russian fuel rods are delivered next year.

Teheran said yesterday that it had arrested an unspecified number of Iranian al-Qa'eda supporters.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911attack; alqaedairan; iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Thanks a lot, Jimmy Carter, you fool. By tolerating the Iranian Revolution, it led to this.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 07/17/2004 4:53:21 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: agrace; lightingguy; EggsAckley; dinasour; AngloSaxon; Dont Mention the War; KangarooJacqui; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/17/2004 4:53:40 PM PDT by MadIvan (Gothic. Freaky. Conservative. - http://www.rightgoths.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace; lightingguy; EggsAckley; dinasour; AngloSaxon; Dont Mention the War; KangarooJacqui; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 07/17/2004 4:53:52 PM PDT by MadIvan (Gothic. Freaky. Conservative. - http://www.rightgoths.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; marron

"Al Qaeda" has been running through Iran for years. For example, to and fro it's Afghan base to the wars in the Caucasus.


4 posted on 07/17/2004 4:56:07 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

At this point it's just a matter of 'when'.


5 posted on 07/17/2004 4:56:22 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

As I recall, Carter virtually made certain that the Iranian revolution would occur by pulling the rug out from under the Shah...


6 posted on 07/17/2004 4:57:57 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Just another Bush-bot biddy drinking that Republican KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

NEXT!


7 posted on 07/17/2004 4:58:42 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

That old fart Castro. He's been alive too long.


8 posted on 07/17/2004 4:59:15 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Iranian officials were instructed not to harrass al-Qa'eda personnel as they crossed the border and, in some cases, not to stamp their passports.

Either you are with us or your against us.

Some Bush officials are privately contemplating a possible military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities before Russian fuel rods are delivered next year.

If we have to through the Israelis dragging their feet.

9 posted on 07/17/2004 4:59:35 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Liberate IRAN, then Seattle !


10 posted on 07/17/2004 5:01:14 PM PDT by SeattleNeedsHelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mohammad Reza Shah's gift to President Jimmy Carter: A portrait of George Washington surrounded with Persian designs.




Jimmy Carter's gift to the Shah. Loss of Persia to the Mullahs




The Mullahs ONLY came into power because the Peacock Shah
refused yet another campaign donation to the DNC or Carter.

For his refusal, Carter pulled the plug and in came Kerry's supporters, the Mullahs.

Pres. Carter's illegal financial demands made upon the Shah of Iran
immediately before Iranian terror takeover

.


11 posted on 07/17/2004 5:02:37 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Follow the money channel.........?


12 posted on 07/17/2004 5:03:19 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
That old fart Castro.

The "fart" may be old, but the rancid smell is strong and lingering.

13 posted on 07/17/2004 5:03:24 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Iran is apparently deeply involved in supporting terrorist attacks on the US and it's interest. In my book the only alternative to doing nothing is to do to Iran what we did to Iraq. Of course this would take a lot more backing of the US President and policy than we, as a nation, have the guts for.

If Kerry is elected in Nov. we will most likely settle into a response pattern of turning the other cheek. Wonder where the first terrorist nuke will "pop?"

14 posted on 07/17/2004 5:03:59 PM PDT by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
A commission official, quoted in the latest edition of Time magazine, alleges that Iranian officials approached Osama bin Laden after the bombing of the USS Cole in 1999, proposing a joint strategy of attacks on US interests.

Except the Cole was bombed in October 2000.

15 posted on 07/17/2004 5:05:00 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

In truth, the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was almost as much of a surprise for the Iranians as it was for the Americans. The Iranian theocracy was vastly more pleased at the outcome than any American, but they had nothing to do with the attack. Indirectly, some of their funding had gone into support and training of some of the operatives, but they would have been totally unaware of any of these objectives.

This one bears right back at al-Qaeda, as a separate entity. Al-Qaeda may have sought sanctuary in the early days, before they congregated in Afghanistan, and the Iranians provided them safe passage over their territory, but that was largely the extent of aid and comfort they offered. Iran shares borders on the east with Afghanistan, and on the west with Iraq, so they may have been in on the safe passage both ways on a number of occasions.


16 posted on 07/17/2004 5:06:26 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

drip, drip, drip


17 posted on 07/17/2004 5:06:47 PM PDT by thoughtomator (End the imperialist moo slime colonization of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

We can nail iran with the rumours that it let zarqawi into iraq.

That together with iranian WMD efforts should be enough to build a case against iran.

However as far as the 911 hijackers are concerned, since the taliban were on very friendly terms with pakistan, and since pakistan had cobbled al qaeda together earlier on, it is very likely that they went from afghanistan to pakistan rather than iran.

The taliban had butchered 11 iranian diplomats and the two of them almost went to war over it. With such open hostility between the two at that time, it wouldnt seem possible.

It is more likely that al qaeda people went from afghanistan into pakistan.


18 posted on 07/17/2004 5:06:57 PM PDT by jerrydavenport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleNeedsHelp
Liberate IRAN, then Seattle !

Does "Seattle need help"?

Then fight it strategically and destroy the CA government structure and stifle the influx!

19 posted on 07/17/2004 5:07:43 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Thank you for that post.


20 posted on 07/17/2004 5:07:47 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Just another Bush-bot biddy drinking that Republican KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson