Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian General Helped 9/11 Plotters
Reuters / Financial Times of London ^ | 7.19/2004 11:47AM

Posted on 7/19/2004, 5:15:08 PM by gopwinsin04

An Iranian general collaborated with Al Qaida to arrange the transit through Iran of nine of the September 11 hijackers, the Arabic newspaper Asarq al-Aqsat reported Monday.

'A general in the Revolutionary Guard apparatus coordinated with the number two man in Al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri, to provide safe passage to around nine of those who carried out the attacks,' the London based newspaper said.

It cited as its source an official in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and said Zawahri, who requested the help, has links going back to the general going back to the early 1990's.

Iranian governmental spokesman Abdollah Ramazanzadeh challenged the newspaper to back up the story.

'If they have concrete proof they should hand it over to the United Nations, and if they really trust their sources they should let us know too,' he told a weekly news conference when asked about the report.

Iran acknowledged that some of the 19 attackers may have passed through illegally, but said it had since tightened border controls.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that Iran had ordered its border guards not to stamp the passports of Saudi Al Qaida members moving through Iran after training in Afghanistan.

An Iranian stamp could have made the Al Qaeda members subject to additional scrutiny upon entering the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.ft.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 911hijackers; alqaedairan; axisofevil; iran; prequel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Axis of Evil update..
1 posted on 7/19/2004, 5:15:12 PM by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

'If they have concrete proof they should hand it over to the United Nations.."

WTF for?! The UN will only sit on it, park it in committee somewhere so either nothing happens or the despots who comprise the majority of the UN agree to think about sort of passing something like a resolution to...to...

Oh, I get it.

Yes, by all means give it to the UN.


2 posted on 7/19/2004, 5:18:49 PM by Gefreiter ("Ignorance is king. Many would not prosper by its abdication.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
'If they have concrete proof they should hand it over to the United Nations, and if they really trust their sources they should let us know too,' he told a weekly news conference when asked about the report.

Sorry, pal, a sovereign nation has the right to respond unilaterally to an act of war. Since an Iranian general participated in the planning, we can therefore conclude that the Iranian military was involved in 9-11. Yet another reason a Kerry presidency will hasten our demise...

3 posted on 7/19/2004, 5:31:36 PM by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
CNN, ABC, CNBC, USA Today, NY & LA Slimes, CBS, PMSNBC, etc. will all file this under the meaningless info category. Few other than those who read here or the Internet will hear of it.
4 posted on 7/19/2004, 5:38:08 PM by RetiredArmy ( I am a Vietnam Vet. I have been accused of war crimes by the ADMITTED WAR CRIMINAL Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

My, My, what a surprise! Who would have ever thought?
(sarcasm)


5 posted on 7/19/2004, 5:51:13 PM by EX52D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EX52D

Iran helps Al Queada with 9/11. Iran tells nuclear regulatory commission to piss up a tree.

No wonder they want Kerry to win so badly.


6 posted on 7/19/2004, 5:59:38 PM by EQAndyBuzz ("John Kerry does not want to lead this country, he wants to be president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Then the Iranian regime should be attacked.


7 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:10:00 PM by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
I think it's a tossup whom I'd attack next - Iran or Syria. The important thing is to stabilize Iraq. Iran is probably more important in that they are further along the nuclear trail. They also have an identifiable opposition element in the country.

If any country aided or abetted those monsters in attacking us then the gloves come off.

8 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:20:41 PM by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

I have a feeling that's exactly where we're headed.


9 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:23:12 PM by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter

A UN resolution to vociferiously condemn such actions and put Iran on double secret probation!


10 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:27:20 PM by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Credo
I think it's a tossup whom I'd attack next - Iran or Syria.

I think Iran is probably more immediately dangerous, although now they're pretty much surrounded. It's still possible for a non-miltary solution though, especially if we can provide support for the reforist elements over there.

If we go into Syria, we must find WMD evidence, or the coalition will be in serious trouble of falling completely apart.

11 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:27:56 PM by kevkrom (My handle is "kevkrom", and I approved this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1; StriperSniper

< libthink>SEE, BUSH WAS WRONG!!! HE ATTACKED THE WRONG COUNTY!!!! < /libthink>


12 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:28:30 PM by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Damascus is a snake pit of terrorists. Tehran uses Damascus to deploy their terrorists. I do agree the reformist opposition elements in Iran should be encouraged to the fullest extent possible.


13 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:31:54 PM by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Ha, yeah if even that much with Syria on the Security Council.

Small wonder he was so hot on handing it over to the UN.


14 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:32:19 PM by Gefreiter ("Ignorance is king. Many would not prosper by its abdication.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

We've got the Bekaa Valley WMD sites in Syria surrounded with predator drones, there is nothing going in or getting out of there.


15 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:35:08 PM by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

IRAN is preparing for war, and doing everything in their power right now to speed up their nuclear arsenal build up so if they are attacked, they will strike nearby allies of the U.S. with nukes and essentially begin wwIII. my prediction. Bush needs to win, and then hit them hard before they have a chance to attack an unsuspecting kerry in 2007-8 when he's cut back our military and defense by 40% by then to pay for his healtcare plan


16 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:38:23 PM by Legion04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ040.107

Public Law 107-40
107th Congress
Joint Resolution



To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and
Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; and
Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; and
Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States:
Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled
....
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES
That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11,
2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.


17 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:38:49 PM by tort_feasor ( anti-Semitism is not a lifestyle choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Sorry, pal, a sovereign nation has the right to respond unilaterally to an act of war.

I'd be satisfied if Iran just handed over the general to the U.S. That, of course, it not likely. This will be interesting.

18 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:42:22 PM by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Maybe we can cut his head off...


19 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:44:08 PM by Eric in the Ozarks (STAGMIRE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
How about this bit of editorialize that appears in the article.

The disclosure has again raised the question in the United States of whether the Bush administration, facing a re-election contest in November, has focused too much on Iraq in seeking state connections to the attacks.

Okay Reuters, just who raised these questions besides your reporter or editor? Sloppy journalism. Making a statement like this without any supporting quote used to get you a failing grade in any journalism course. But then, who practices journalism at Reuters anymore.

20 posted on 7/19/2004, 6:46:59 PM by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson