Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The EXPLANATION: Sandy Berger is covering up Bill Clinton’s GREATEST CRIME (2004)
Free Republic | 7-2-0-04 | Bill Charleston

Posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by BILL_C

What do some of the craziest events in recent American History all have in common? No, this is not another Blue Dress story, but it is about the biggest crime Bill Clinton committed as president. It was such a small political lie for him but it turned out to have incredible ramifications to our country. Slick Willy may be headed for the title of worst president in United States history, in fact, he might even qualify for the biggest traitor label.

And further more, you don’t even suspect it happened.

Just what was Sandy Berger doing stuffing documents into his clothes while preparing for the 9-11 hearings? Lanny Davis was on natioal news earlier today saying that the leak right before the Democratic Convention just had to be politically motivated.

Did you ever wonder how literally hundreds of witnesses could see a mass murder but the official report not only ignores these citizens but offers solutions that are physically impossible? Conclusions such as this are possible whenever the conspiracy label is attached. And what was all the fuss about Jamie Gorelick being on the 9-11commission? Why did we get bored seeing Richard Clark attacking President Bush in the 9-11 hearings? If you’re one of Bill Clinton’s boys or girls that was in his inner circle, the noose is tightening.

They know what happened but you don’t know, not yet.

In 1994, Bill Clinton was shocked at the Republican massacre in the congressional election. His chances of reelection seemed dim. Drastic action was called for if he was going to see a second term.

The first challenge to Bill Clinton was the Federal Building bombing at Oklahoma City in 1995. As documented in Jayana Davis’ book “The Third Terrorist”, McVeigh and Nichol’s were not the only ones involved in the bombing. It seems that there were Iraqi defectors from Gulf War 1 in OKC. One of the Iraqi soldiers got out of the truck with McVeigh a few minutes before the truck bomb exploded. You may recall the story during the Nichols trial in OKC earlier this spring concerning the surveillance tape that agreed with witnesses showing two men getting out of the truck. Later, the FBI said there was no surveillance tape. This same Iraqi later moved to Boston and was working at Boston Logan Int’l airport the morning of 9-11-01. Is it a small world or was something going on here? The FBI has never investigated.

In Jayna’s book, she ties the Iraqis together with McVeigh and Nichols. Read the book and listen to her interview with Jim Quinn from Pittsburgh in the WARROOM which was aired April 20, 2004. It is in the archives. It will open your eyes.

Why did the investigation focus on two Americans when numerous witnesses testified that others were involved? And of course the initial reports detailed that two middle Eastern men were wanted? What happened?

Bill Clinton knew that if it was shown that foreign terrorists were killing Americans in Oklahoma City his chance of being reelected would vanish. Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing middle eastern terrorists from the equation and concluding that two right wing extremists motivated by Waco were the cause, the only cause. There was no Middle Eastern conspiracy by presidential order.

Flash ahead to July, 1996 and an airplane leaving from JFK in New York City crashes off Long Island. Hundreds of witnesses see a missile shoot the plane from the sky but the investigation concludes that it was a center fuel tank explosion. Jack Cashill in his book on flight TWA 800 faces the same problem that Jayna Davis did with the Oklahoma City bombing a year earlier. WHY? Witnesses saw one thing but the investigation reported something else.

The crash of TWA 800 occurred before the Democratic convention. As in Oklahoma City, Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing terrorism from the equation. Richard Clark supplied the center fuel tank scenario, the CIA supplied the computer simulation and Bill Clinton was home free.

Flash ahead to 9-11-01: Bill Clinton has said several times that he first thought of Bin Laden when he heard about the WTC attacks. Actually it had to be Al Qaeda, not Iraq, or his “brilliant” plan might be discovered. But Clinton was not out of the woods yet.

The 9-11 commission is tasked with finding the truth. Jamie Gorelick is on the commission to ensure they don’t. Sandy Berger while preparing to testify is caught removing classified documents by hiding them under his clothes. Anyone who has ever held a TOP SECRET clearance can relate to the sinking feeling he must have in his stomach today as the news is released.

The lies that turned to conspiracy theories led to thousands dying in NYC and Washington, DC on 9-11. Instead of Bill Clinton taking care of business in Iraq in 1995 when Iraqi defectors were caught killing Americans he covered up their involvement to get reelected. His co-conspirators are still trying to cover up the biggest lie in American history.

One of the questions now facing Sandy Berger is will he get a deal? I’m sure he watches Law and Order occasionally so he’s probably familiar with the process. Sell out Bill Clinton and the democratic party and you may get out of jail one day. Otherwise, it just doesn’t look very good.

Bill Clinton, the noose is tightening around your neck. Your legacy is the least of your problems. Everyone understands you’re a natural born liar but most didn’t even suspect the havoc you caused with you lies in 1995.

Now everyone will know it wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was Slick Willy all along.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: berger; clinton; coverup; okcbombing; oklahomacity; pantthrax; sandyberger; soxgate; thethirdterrorist; treason; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301 next last
To: BILL_C
Someday the whole truth about the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy conspiracy will come out.

Was Clinton spending terrorist money going after everyday American conservatives?

41 posted on 07/20/2004 8:42:55 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C
I agree with you.

I was just wondering about what state you are from.

I'm from Pennsylvania. I know it's no big deal, I was just curious.

42 posted on 07/20/2004 8:43:14 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Eagles Up !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C

OK, thanks a lot.


43 posted on 07/20/2004 8:44:03 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

I'm willing to bet a steak dinner that Berger was in there lifting out Clinton's obvious foreign policy failures from the document stack. Leaving a paper trail that connected Bush 41 and Bush 43, as if nothing went wrong during the Clinton administration. It would fit the template of the left-winged kookburger conspiracy theory that Clinton was the "Greatest President of the late 20th Century" and the Bush's were/are complete failures.


44 posted on 07/20/2004 8:48:09 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (While Bush plays "rope a dope", Kerry/Edwards play "grope a dope".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
This story may have been leaked by a RAT with the pre-meditated "it's a conspiracy" response ready for deployment.

I think that's exactly what happened - a preemptive strike. Guess it backfired. Whoops....

45 posted on 07/20/2004 8:49:02 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Thanks for the PING...
BKMRK for later...
Looking for a previous thread at the moment...
Getting Late...Not Thinking Clearly!


46 posted on 07/20/2004 8:50:25 PM PDT by FlashBack (Faith will not make our path easy, but it will give us strength for the Journey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

That's a very good point. What was their reason, I wonder? Any ideas, expatpat or any Freeper?


47 posted on 07/20/2004 8:51:35 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Oh yeah this is the real deal....but I have believed that since 1993 and the first WTC...once I read Bodansky and Mylroie I knew that we were in a wrold of hurt


48 posted on 07/20/2004 8:52:33 PM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C
The only Justice Department official she mentions by name is Jamie Gorelick.

Remarkable.

49 posted on 07/20/2004 8:54:02 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C


One term Sin-ator "The Shrew"

50 posted on 07/20/2004 8:54:02 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Thanks for that link. I've followed Jayna, starting on FR, and then heard her on local talk radio (Philly WPHT 1210) with Michael Smerconish. That day Michael was simulcasting from Senator Arlen Spector's office. There was a thread, I would have to go back and try to find it. She had on 2 counter terrorism experts who believed her story, re the FBI mess that ensued. He promised to look into it, considering the Burton investigation. I've called his office a few times to follow up. I don't think he is following up. Surprise!!


51 posted on 07/20/2004 8:54:06 PM PDT by baseballmom (Michael Moore - An un-American Hatriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: baseballmom

I would be devastated to think that my government lied to me about these things




I am working on an article which is exploding into a book (unfortunately) on one of the conspiracy "events."

I know absolutely for sure that our government is lying on one VERY important piece of history.

That made it easy for me to connect the dots. The Sandy Berger story just made the Clinton election lie fit.

One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton. W may have been waiting for the right time, which may be now.

The democRATS have broached the rumor that Bin Laden is being held to be released around election time. They probably didn't know about Berger getting caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Hence Davis' comment today about political motivated timing.

Like the RATS haven't done worse, lots worse.


52 posted on 07/20/2004 8:55:06 PM PDT by BILL_C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: baseballmom

Specter the backstabber deserves a trip to the unemployment office.

But Bush endorsed him! Go figure.


53 posted on 07/20/2004 8:56:23 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Palm Beach voters: It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C
One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton. W may have been waiting for the right time, which may be now.

Man, I hope you're right about that. I'm currently VERY disillusioned with the GOP and our left leaning leadership.

54 posted on 07/20/2004 8:58:53 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Palm Beach voters: It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C
Bill loves conspiracy, It's a license to lie. And that's what he does best!

Bump

Former President Bill Clinton (news - web sites) responds to questions before autographing copies of his book during an appearance at a downtown Denver bookstore Tuesday, July 20, 2004. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

55 posted on 07/20/2004 9:00:35 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Godspeed x40 ... Support Our Troops!!! ......Become a FR Monthly Donor ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Specter is going to lose anyways. Sayonara infiltrator.


56 posted on 07/20/2004 9:01:06 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I guess when the story of Bush's drunken driving arrest came out 3 days before the election there was no political motivation.


57 posted on 07/20/2004 9:01:18 PM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C

This may be a little off-topic, but Spain has been having hearings regarding the March 11 terrorist attack. One thing that emerged is that ETA (native terrorist group) and the Muslims had stolen cars in the same town on the same day and were headed for the same place. Both were stopped by the police (for false license plates). The ETA members were arrested and their van was searched, revealing 1000 lbs of dynamite; the Moroccans were stopped but were only cited (for a counterfeit license plate!) and their van (which also contained hundreds of pounds of explosives) was not searched.

In the case of Spain, the domestic terrorists working with the Islamists were caught, but the foreign terrorists eventually succeeded and did the deed ; in the case of OKC, only the domestic terrorists with whom the Muslims were working were caught, or, for that matter, even searched for, probably thanks to the Clinton Rules.


58 posted on 07/20/2004 9:01:52 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C
One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton.

I've thought about this a lot, and I know a lot of FReepers are really on GW's case about not going after Clinton. My personal view is that GWB is trying to protect the PRESIDENCY - not Bill Clinton - but the office of President of the United States. I understand, as I think it would be devastaing for the country, as well as world stability, to think that a president of the United States would cover up something of this magnitude.

For money? I don't think so, the presidency carries with it so many perks, and even the period after the presidency. Money rolls in. Look at the oodles of cash the Clinton and Hillary are raking in, via books, speeches, public appearances. I think it is all about the power. There is nothing like being the most powerful person in the world, is there. What a rush, as we used to say.
59 posted on 07/20/2004 9:02:48 PM PDT by baseballmom (Michael Moore - An un-American Hatriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Berger was in there lifting out Clinton's obvious foreign policy failures from the document stack




If a few of us are right on this, Berger was in there getting information on Clinton's ties to terrorism years before 9-11.

There are many people that know pieces of these conspiracy incidents but only a few that understand that some lies are being told.

You can't let documents fall in the hands of those who don't know the details.


60 posted on 07/20/2004 9:06:25 PM PDT by BILL_C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson