And just how would a Libertarian government have dealt with the post 9/11 islamic-terroristic world?
Would they have acted any differently? Or would they have blindly held to their notion of not getting into 'foreign entaglements?'
I'm tired of hearing the Libertarians play Monday morning quarterback.
Face it, by voting Libertarian you are voting for Kerry. Period. You'd think that some of you would have learned that back in 1992 when the Perot factor ushered in the "Great Clintonian Era".
You guys really need to get your head examined.
By opening up the borders completely.
Would they have acted any differently? Or would they have blindly held to their notion of not getting into 'foreign entaglements?'
Unfortunately, the latter. That's a big part of why I'm not voting Libertarian this time.
As a Libertarian, I do not believe in the initiation of force, but by God we must respond to it a million fold, if need be!
"And just how would a Libertarian government have dealt with the post 9/11 islamic-terroristic world?"
Any consideration of Libertarianism went down the sh!tter, when shortly after 9/11/2001 Harry Browne opened his mouth.
That did it. It showed me the weak minds of these Monday morning, minor party philosophers. Puny minded writers and talkers.
If I recall, the platform is: abortion at will, drugs for all, open borders, and blame America first on foreign policy (as Browne did). Really swell.