I agree. O'Reilly buys into the "it was all about WMD" argument and so he is not able to argue effectivly.
But even if you're going to misunderstand the full reasons for finishing the war in Iraq, you have to ask the detractors what do they want to do now?
Do they want to reinstall Saddam?
Do they want to re-open the rape rooms?
O'Reilly is right about one thing: Moore is Saddam's biggest defender.
Why did O'Reilly let Moore get away with that "imminent danger" misstatement. UGGGHHHHH....