Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is ''Liberal'' a Negative Word?
Chron Watch ^ | 28 July 2004 | Lee Ellis

Posted on 07/28/2004 7:39:58 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Lando Lincoln
Why is "liberal" a negative word?

What planet has this doofus been on?

21 posted on 07/28/2004 8:21:24 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Publius6961
Liberalism, as defined today, is a negative word because it bases it's entire philosophy on negativism. It defines itself not so much as what it is for but what it is against.

Second, it's a mental disorder!

23 posted on 07/28/2004 8:29:33 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Why is this bad?

If you don't try to take away the freedom of others and finance your agenda with the money of others, it wouldn't be so bad. Unfortunately, that's exactly what liberals do when they get elected.

24 posted on 07/28/2004 8:33:29 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

In 1945 a liberal was to the right of socialist. Today the liberal and socialist occupy the same slot. I dare say that today liberal politicians and their friends are getting rich off socialist government programs. Duh?


25 posted on 07/28/2004 8:42:11 AM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

" I would like to know why ''liberal'' is a negative word."

Would you rather we call you socialist/marxist anti-American person? Alright then, you are a liberal.


26 posted on 07/28/2004 8:44:49 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

IMO .... 2004 Liberal = Socialist edging on Communist = people who wish everyone to be equal execpt for themselves who wish to be more equal than the others


27 posted on 07/28/2004 9:00:57 AM PDT by clamper1797 (This Vietnam Vet ain't Fonda Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

The term 'Liberal' was once a good word to describe what the Conservative party and people really were. That word has been corrupted by the Democrat party is associated with communism and socialism which kills and destroys people and nations.


28 posted on 07/28/2004 9:04:42 AM PDT by Chewbacca (Michael Moore is a filthy piece of distended rectum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Close enough. Call 'em as you see 'em. If we continue to call a LIBERAL a LIBERAL long enough, maybe there is a chance that we can educate those who want to learn and turn this left-facing nation around.
29 posted on 07/28/2004 9:07:25 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy
"Why Is ''Liberal'' a Negative Word?"
If ya gotta ask ya haven't been paying attention.
30 posted on 07/28/2004 9:21:16 AM PDT by Warren (Orhe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

"Liberal" has become a dirty word for the same reasons that "diversity" has... because it's been consistently used as a euphemism for humanity-destroying socialism.


31 posted on 07/28/2004 9:25:58 AM PDT by thoughtomator (End the imperialist moo slime colonization of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
It seems "liberal" is a dirty word even to liberals.
They prefer to be called "progressives".

I consider a "progressive" to be much worse than a "liberal". To me, a "progressive" is a flaming Communist.

32 posted on 07/28/2004 10:02:49 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
6. Guaranteed health care

In the event that this comes to pass, I have a question. Will national health care guarantee everyone who needs it a transplant? Chemotherapy? Dialysis? (Please note that in the UK, people over 59 are NOT dialyzed.) Plastic surgeries? Where will the research $$ come from? Would this be dispensed in the fashion of public health clinics?

If 44 mm people in the US have no health care, I am assuming this is roughly 20%. What percentage of these folks are illegal? Would they be eligible, too?

Since the advent of the big HMOs, the transfer of wealth from physicians to the big companies has occurred. Is medicine better in this country because of it?

We have the best medical care in the world because we pay for it. If we have public health care, who will choose how the hearts/lungs/livers/kidneys/eyes are distributed? Who will get the preemie care par excellence? Who will get the newest treatments for rare diseases? Not everyone can benefit equally. It is logistically impossible.
33 posted on 07/28/2004 11:12:45 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
They prefer to be called "progressives".

Time to go to work on that word. "Gee, Mr. Lib, why do you call yourself progressive? Isn't that the description of an untreated cancer?"

34 posted on 07/28/2004 11:31:55 AM PDT by Denver Ditdat (Ronald Reagan belongs to the ages now, but we preferred it when he belonged to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Actually, I think a premise of teh original point is wrong. When did we sacrifice hope? We as a people are among the most optimistic and forward looking people in the globe.


35 posted on 07/28/2004 11:35:23 AM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: anniegetyourgun

Reminds me of Churchill's comments re Chamberlain that he had faced a choice between War and Dishonor, had chosen Dishonor, and would get War.


37 posted on 07/28/2004 12:27:27 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Generally people who do work hard to accomplish things lose their incentive to do so when those who do nothing get the same thing for free.

BINGO!

38 posted on 07/28/2004 12:32:19 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (Freedom Stands Because Heroes Serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

progressive compared to what?


39 posted on 07/28/2004 1:08:12 PM PDT by NRA1995
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
1. I would like to know why ''liberal'' is a negative word.

It's a negative word to me because I've met and talked with liberals.

40 posted on 07/28/2004 1:11:19 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson