Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/02/2004 10:50:06 AM PDT by Jeff Blogworthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MurryMom

Your 'boyz' may want to peruse this before spouting the same tired out "Bush Lied" BS.

If you want to talk about being misled into war, talk about Clinton, and the disgraced and FIRED former SACEUR.
This has been a public service announcement.


2 posted on 08/02/2004 10:57:19 AM PDT by Darksheare (<=== Has been thrown into a grain sack and hauled away by Amazons. All posts are now by an imposter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy

In Kosovo, we fought on the side of the Islamic Jihad.

In Iraq, we fight against them.

Pick your party. Vote accordingly.


3 posted on 08/02/2004 10:58:53 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (We live in a wonderful country where any child can grow up to be the next Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy

http://wesclarkwarcriminal.tripod.com/generalwesleyclarkwarcriminalsupporterofterrorismandhypocrite/id1.html

Vain, Pompous, Brown-noser
Meet the Real Gen. Clark


"The reaction from former army subordinates is very different.


"The poster child for everything that is wrong with the GO (general officer) corps," exclaims one colonel, who has had occasion to observe Clark in action, citing, among other examples, his command of the 1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood from 1992 to 1994.

While Clark's official Pentagon biography proclaims his triumph in "transitioning the Division into a rapidly deployable force" this officer describes the "1st Horse Division" as "easily the worst division I have ever seen in 25 years of doing this stuff."

Such strong reactions are common. A major in the 3rd Brigade of the 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson, Colorado when Clark was in command there in the early 1980s described him as a man who "regards each and every one of his subordinates as a potential threat to his career".

While he regards his junior officers with watchful suspicion, he customarily accords the lower ranks little more than arrogant contempt. A veteran of Clark's tenure at Fort Hood recalls the general's "massive tantrum because the privates and sergeants and wives in the crowded (canteen) checkout lines didn't jump out of the way fast enough to let him through".""


4 posted on 08/02/2004 11:00:45 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
What must be done when a President misleads the American people into a war that has nothing even remotely to do with U.S. national security; lies about the reasons for going to war; violates the War Powers Resolution; refuses diplomatic options; deposes a democratically elected president; has no exit strategy or definition of victory; and causes unnecessary U.S. casualties in the process?

You mean Kennedy/Johnson getting us into Viet Nam?

They're dead Jeff.
There is nothing left to 'do' to them.

So9

5 posted on 08/02/2004 11:01:47 AM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
Yaaaawn & Pretty Boy are now supposedly taking the High Road and not calling the President of the United States a liar. They are saying he misled the country on the war in Iraq. What is the difference between lying and misleading? He is now claiming that the Uranium in Africa was a fabrication even when 3 different countries and 2 independent committees verify that Sadamn was trying to buy it. Someone is lying and it ain’t GW! The larger question is what would the world look like if Yaaaawn were President? How safe would the world be if The Taliban and Sadamn were still in power like he would have it???

Lt Kerry claims that his war experience gives him a better view of being a wartime President which would have disqualified Franklin Roosevelt. How then does he act so naive when dealing with our enemies who have our destruction as their ultimate goal. Just as he was a willing dupe during the Vietnam war with the North Vietnamese, he is showing that same ignorance with the War on Terror. How much risk is he willing to take before he would act to protect the United States?? In Vietnam, he was only risking a million or so Gooks who were later killed by his buddy Ho Chi Minh, what about Americans???

The two heavily Democrat partisan Senate Committees found that The Bush Administration did not lie or mislead the American People when they assessed the information they had. The CIA was so positive there were WMDs that they said it was a “slam dunk” in finding them. The committees also found that there were definitely connections between Sadamn and Al Queda who both wanted the deaths of millions of Americans. Knowing this President Bush was faced with the decision to attack Afghanistan and later Iraq to reduce/eliminate this risk. This decision did not come easily, but if there was a chance of another attack on America he would have been derelict to not attack.

If there was a 1 in 1000 chance that Sadamn had weapons he could give to terrorists to make a biological or nuclear attack on a major city, could he accept that risk. As a leader he could not accept any chance of killing a million Americans. That doesn’t even count the number of rabbits, deer and spotted owl that could be collateral casualties. Most likely he had weapons and we knew he could get a nuclear within time if he didn’t already, then it was just a matter of delivery. A leader should always err on the side of caution which is exactly what President George W Bush did and will do.

Yaaaaawn Cut & Ran Kerry says that he will only respond after we are attacked and only after he has everybody in the world agreeing. He would not attack if there was a 1 in 1000 or 1 in 2, he would need a 100% surety before he would consider going to war. There is no such thing as 100% in the War on Terror, which is why he is blind to the Truth and only pandering to the anti-war crowd. Another words after we have a million dead in NYC we will go to the UN (assuming it is still standing), hat in hand and ask France, Syria and Madagascar if it would be ok to attack a condom factory in the Sudan like the good ol 90's?? Meanwhile the terrorist network will go along without any worry of ever being attacked. If Kerry were President Saddamn would still be trying to buy Uranium from Africa and Nuclear warheads from Korea while the camps run freely in Trashcanistand & Iraq.

In a world that is full of the most dangerous weapons in the history of mankind we need a leader who will do what he says without checking the weather vane first. In Vietnam it was only Vietnamese who were losing their lives because of Kerry’s anti-war beliefs, this time we are in the cross-hair. He has showed his acceptance of risking & losing millions of lives for the advancement of Communism in Nam, can we afford that risk our lives. We have a leader who has proved he will not accept those odds, can we afford to play the hand any other way? Vote Bush!

Pray for W and Our Amazing Troops

7 posted on 08/02/2004 11:04:36 AM PDT by bray (Yaaaawn Tax , Tax , Tax & Kerry wants your paycheck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
What must be done when a political party misleads the American people about a war that in large part will determine the future for U.S. national security; lies about the reasons for going to war; violates the most fundamental principles of honesty and fair discourse; insists upon handing-over national sovereignty to a bunch of effeminate Marxist Euroweenies; tries to steal a US presidential election by using false claims of racism; wants to flee its oversees responsibilities while screaming, "I'm sorry! It's all our fault!"; and causes unnecessary U.S. casualties in the process by undermining our troops even as they fight for us?

Good question, Democrats.

9 posted on 08/02/2004 11:06:05 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
...in case you were wondering, the Kosovo War cost us roughly $12 billion. What did we accomplish in return? Greater international respect? Heightened national security? Anything at all?

During the bombing campaign I read that a former resident of Yugoslavia had stated that Clinton had accomplished in a few weeks what Hitler, Stalin and Tito hadn't been able to accomplish in over 60 years. ... Get the Serbs to hate America.

12 posted on 08/02/2004 11:31:38 AM PDT by nuke_road_warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
Kerry 2004



I want to be the President,
Though all know I can’t lead.
I really want the power though,
It’s really what I need.



I’ll lie and cheat and fabricate,
I’ll flip and flop for sure.
The left’s so dumb they’ll vote for me,
For stupid, there’s no cure.



George Bush lied, I’ll chant and sing,
Though I know it’s not true.
I love America I’ll say,
Another lie for you.



I’ll back the UN’s global push,
No sovereignty for us.
The world rides free at our expense,
We’ll even buy the bus.



Let terror rain down on this land,
We really are to blame.
Oh yes, I fought in Viet Nam,
Four months, then home I came.



Three Purple Hearts for paper cuts,
Like some rite of passage.
You bet my name’s John Kerry,
And I approve this message.



Conspiracy Guy 7/30/2004

13 posted on 08/02/2004 11:42:30 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy

BTTT


15 posted on 08/02/2004 11:50:12 AM PDT by spodefly (This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy

I have long thought that Kosovo should be brought up into the public attention loud and clear. Where were the anti war phonies then???


17 posted on 08/02/2004 1:47:44 PM PDT by tkathy (The choice is clear. Big tent or no tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Blogworthy
MurryMom and others don't care because they got screwed over by their guy.
20 posted on 08/07/2004 12:34:20 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson