Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/03/2004 4:34:55 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
I look at the assault weapons ban kind of like the teacher you had in grade school who, after getting hit in the back of the head with a spit ball, made the entire class stay after school.

The AWB isn't about punishing the "entire class"; rather, it's an attempt to incrementally make ALL firearms illegal (but it probably won't work out the way Feinstein and her gang had planned; hopefully, it will sunset). Banning a weapon based on it's looks is just plain stoopid.

2 posted on 08/03/2004 4:46:36 PM PDT by Born Conservative (“Consensus is the negation of leadership.” – Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
When it comes down to it, I guess I fall on the side of the responsible gun owners, and in the meantime I will do my best to lock up the gun-carrying criminals.

Fair enough.

3 posted on 08/03/2004 5:02:25 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"That program (Project "Safe" Neighborhoods) is designed to go after the criminal gun owners use and possession of firearms, mostly felons people in possession of weapons and people with drugs and guns, and lock them up in federal prison. We have had some success with that program in targeting the illegal use of firearms." - Chief "Meathead" Mehlin
4 posted on 08/03/2004 5:12:31 PM PDT by TERMINATTOR (Don't blame me - I voted for McClintock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
There are no clear-cut solutions to this debate. This is why we have elected legislators, to determine and carry out the will of the people.

I disagree! Our legislators have proved that they can't be trusted.

6 posted on 08/03/2004 5:43:21 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb, but how well you bounce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This kind of mealy mouthed statist pap is much more dangerous than the overtly gun grabbing fascists.


7 posted on 08/03/2004 8:56:00 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sounds like this guy is in training to be a politician. 4 paragraphs without ever managing to make a concise statement.

He wants to not support it, but freedom be damned, what if one of his officers gets hurt by one? Maybe he'll be in favor of banning cars next, or at least a study to see if it will save lives.

Dang, will someone please bring back the men in this world?


8 posted on 08/03/2004 9:40:15 PM PDT by LaraCroft (If the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, do the stupid get stupider?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
After lucidly explaining the arguments he ends with an emotional issues that appears to carry as much weight as the overwhelming logical points.

I think it is the lack of control over situations that compels people to "lash out" and do something, just anything, rational or not, just to do something.
9 posted on 08/04/2004 4:33:32 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Flush the Two Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson