Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fso301; Carl/NewsMax; Steve Malzberg; MeekOneGOP; Interesting Times; Mia T; Grampa Dave; ...


It is time to publish all personal and business info on NYT leaking traitor journalists.

Not here on FR, but on easily accessible well known websites.


The New York Times has joined Al Qaeda as a full partner and is now proven to be the enemy of the USA.


Anyone with information on the names of reporters and editors and management involved in this particular traitorous leak and breech of our security please FReepmail me to names, links, sources, etc.

I will take it from there.

There are surviving families of our brave US troops who were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq and military and civilians killed here in the USA on 911 who are anxious to find the names and addresses and details on these NYT traitors.

I will see that these NYT pinkos are handled properly on the web and also contacted and met up close and personal.


Ink for Blood!





76 posted on 08/08/2004 1:25:39 AM PDT by devolve (TERRY KERRY: http://pro.lookingat.us/ShoveIt.html -- http://pro.lookingat.us/TeresaWendys.html --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: devolve; fso301; jimbo123
The NY Slimes printed his name. What slimeballs. And this PMSNBC BS article makes it sound like "The Americans" revealed an undercover sting operation.

Note to PMSNBC BS: The NY Slimes are ANTI-American.




Experts taken by surprise
Intelligence and security experts said they were surprised that Washington would reveal information that could expose the name of a source during an ongoing law enforcement operation.

“If it’s true that the Americans have unintentionally revealed the identity of another nation’s intelligence agent, who appears to be working in the good of all of us, that is not only a fundamental intelligence flaw. It’s also a monumental foreign relations blunder,” security expert Paul Beaver, a former publisher of Jane’s Defense Weekly, told Reuters.

Kevin Rosser, a security expert at the London-based consultancy Control Risks Group, said such a disclosure was a risk that came with staging public alerts but that authorities were supposed to take special care not to ruin ongoing operations.

“When these public announcements are made, they have to be supported with some evidence, and in addition to creating public anxiety and fatigue, you can risk revealing sources and methods of sensitive operations,” he said.



77 posted on 08/08/2004 3:58:24 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: devolve

Bump!


78 posted on 08/08/2004 7:36:01 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: devolve; MeekOneGOP

What ever happened to 'Loose lips sink ships'?? I can't believe there isn't some law covering this type of thing during wartime.


79 posted on 08/08/2004 7:11:20 PM PDT by potlatch (Sometimes I think I understand everything, then I regain consciousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson