Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salem
1. The Hebrews of the Bible have no connection to the Jews today.

Well, many Eastern European Jews are descendents of the Khazars but what about hte Yemeni jews or the Jews from Spain or North Africa or India?  These were dispersed way before the Khazars converted

2. The Hebrews of the Bible were Arabs.

If he means semitics then he is correct

3. The Prophets of the Bible were Muslims.

Slammies believe that the prophets were all slammies

4. Biblical King Solomon was a Muslim Prophet.

ditto

5. Solomon’s Temple was not built by Israelites but by Arab Canaanites.

Canaanites were not Arabs.

6. The Canaanites are the forefathers of the Palestinians

Maybe, to some extent

7. The Bible is legends based on what Jews imagined and not on history.

And yet they consider the Bible to be a Holy book

8. The Jews today are descendents of a 13 th Century Khazar tribe with no history in the Land of Israel.

Some Jews are descendents of the Khazars, that is true, but go to my reply to point 1

9. The location of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is a Zionist invention.

The lies these slammies tell and believe!

10. Zionism is Racism.

huh?  Both Arabs and Jews are semitics, how can there be racism if they both belong to the same race?

29 posted on 08/08/2004 10:40:36 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
From the article
"1. The Hebrews of the Bible have no connection to the Jews today."
Cronos responded
Well, many Eastern European Jews are descendents of the Khazars but what about hte Yemeni jews or the Jews from Spain or North Africa or India? These were dispersed way before the Khazars converted
Certainly some Ashkenazi Jews (for instance me) are descended, in part, from the Khazar nobility that converted. However there was much more intermarriage with Slavic and Germanic Europeans. Still, the genetic evidence shows that Jews from around the world are genetically similar.

"2. The Hebrews of the Bible were Arabs."
If he means semitics then he is correct

Semites, yes. Southwestern nomads, like the Arabs, no.

"3. The Prophets of the Bible were Muslims."
Slammies believe that the prophets were all slammies

Supercession theologies are not pretty.

"5. Solomon’s Temple was not built by Israelites but by Arab Canaanites."
Canaanites were not Arabs.

If you believe the Bible and the Koran, this is untrue since the Canaanites where destroyed by then.
If you go by linguistics, Ancient Hebrew is a Canaanite laguage, similar to Phonecian, and Ugaritic. However, it had Northwester Semitic influences, even before Aramaic became the lingua-franca of the region.
However, the Arabs were Southwestern Semites.

"6. The Canaanites are the forefathers of the Palestinians"
Maybe, to some extent

Not historically.

"9. The location of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is a Zionist invention."
The lies these slammies tell and believe!

No, both the Torah and Koran place it on Mt. Moriah.

huh? Both Arabs and Jews are semitics, how can there be racism if they both belong to the same race?
It is tribalist.

40 posted on 08/08/2004 11:07:02 AM PDT by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson