Posted on 08/09/2004 6:56:22 AM PDT by Elkiejg
If kerry never brought up his service record then i would say these commericals are out of line but he will not drop it, so he has to expect this kind of stuff. Kerry this isnt Massachusetts anymore
Boortz is great, as always.
This story won't go away. Do I dare start to hope that the media will actually start looking at the FACTS of Kerry's abbreviated tour of duty?
"My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in '68 and '69, involved with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, put our crews in jeopardy... if a man like that can't handle that 6-man crew boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?"
-- Steven Gardner
The above quote was from a press conference given at the National Press Club in Washington on May 4, 2004. You may view Stevens comments at the following web site. Just scroll down to Stevens picture and click on it.
http://swift1.he.net/~swiftvet/index.php?topic=SwiftVetQuotes
Searching through that web site, you will find 250 men who served on Swift boats, including the entire chain of command above Lt. Kerry, agree with Steven Gardner that Kerry is not fit to be Commander-in-Chief. That compares to the 13 crew members who support his candidacy.
Don't hold your breath until the media looks into his short tour of duty.
In 1971 when Kerry made public statements that he committed atrocities, was there an investigation? If so, what were the findings and have they been made public?
Very interesting. Do we need any more evidence of leftist bias in the media?
Problem with this is the Rats and media --I know, same thing -- can spin any Republican questioning of Kerry's service into "attacks". I think we need to hear more Bush supporters on TV
1) pointing out that they would love to be able to ignore an examination of Kerry's VN experience but that he is the one who keeps bringing it up.
2) presenting Kerry's Senate record and asking why Kerry is ashamed to run on that.
I watched the press conference where the letter surfaced that Al Queda was complaining Bush was "destroying us".
All the reporters could do was ask the same question over and over again - was Bush AWOL during his guard service. They were rude and fixated on this.
Now they don't want to even touch this issue with Kerry- not to find out the truth, nothing. I am so sick of the biased liberal media. I don't buy newspapers anymore, don't watch mainstream TV news. I've had it.
Not likely, unless some bombshell hits the Kerry story...even Fox News is backing off on the veterans' stories.....always the double standard for the Republicans.......very, very frustrating....
He was a manipulative schemer but Kerry never volunteered to get anywhere near Vietnam combat.
I see that you are doing the same thing that I am. I only watch the local news, don't take any papers, and watch Fox. Even Susan Estrich on Fox pisses me off and I e-mailed them to complain. Told them to buy her a can of Raid so she would quit squirming around from the ants in her panties. I can take Alan Colmes but not she drives me up the wall.
good point!
truth is you cant live in the "fish bowl" that is politics & put up "curtains" to selectively hide certain info from the public.
I don't know Neal Boortz.
But that is a GREAT title.
Like some FReeper's tag line says: "I went to Vietnam, yadda yadda yadda, I want to be President." That's the campaign.
Dan
Gotta love #9!
Dan
Oh, wow! It's awesome, thanks so much for ping :-)
Prime Choice... one of your best ever and absolutely perfect!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.