Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giant wave could threaten US
BBC ^ | 10 August 2004

Posted on 08/09/2004 8:34:11 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: asgardshill

When I first heard about this island, the same thought occured to me. But, it is just too perfect, too much like a movie script. Al Quaida is just not that imaginative. They aren't reading this, are they?


81 posted on 08/09/2004 9:55:31 PM PDT by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
You missed it. The Day After Tomorrow was all the rage for a weekend or so.


82 posted on 08/09/2004 9:57:16 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
The wall of water would weaken as it crossed the ocean, but would still be 40-50 metres (130-160 feet) high by the time it hit land.

Surf's up !


83 posted on 08/09/2004 9:59:59 PM PDT by pyx (Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

"I have a hard time believing that an explosion/landslide off the coast of Africa could cause a tsunami to travel all the way across the Atlantic ocean.

Remember that we are talking thousands of miles travelled here and that such a wave front would spread out to devastate the entire east cost of the New World. The energy required for that would just be, IMO, impossible to create with a simple landslide."



Remember that the earthquake in Alaska travelled around the planet either 5 or 7 times. The tsunami killed many people in Japan. The energy of the wave travels along the bottom of the ocean, where at those densities and pressures, nearly 100% of the initial energy transfers. It is NOT evident on the surface....At least not until all that energy begins racing up the continental shelf, where it would become slightly visible. At shoreline, however, we would witness a wave or series of waves that were indeed 500-600 meters tall. Yes, 1900 feet tall. And yes, moving at nearly 400 miles per hour.

The Navy has installed instruments to detect the energy of a tsunami on the ocean bottoms, so there would be some warning. How many would believe it is up for questions.


84 posted on 08/09/2004 10:17:05 PM PDT by datura (The Difference Between a Democrat and a Communist Is????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
Does anyone really live on Hierro?

People live on all of them. And only La Gomera, if I'm not mistaken, has no airport (there's no area flat enough for one).

85 posted on 08/09/2004 10:35:03 PM PDT by phroebe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

Damn, I really need to think these through a bit more.


86 posted on 08/09/2004 10:44:28 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (Conservative, Republican, Raider Fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Wouldn't the wave go in all directions??
For a millisecond, yes. However, the cliff behind the fallen side would reflect the energy/waterwave forward.
AS for the article, I think I saw this on the Discovery channel last year. They did a week of disasters, including spacebourne body collisions, megatsunami, megavolcanoes, solar flares, hurricanes and tornadoes.
87 posted on 08/09/2004 10:55:40 PM PDT by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ScottinSacto

I already have one about a nuke going off at yellowstone park, which is an active caldera.


88 posted on 08/09/2004 10:58:08 PM PDT by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
paiging Laird Johnson. Forget about an arctic storm producing a 100-foot wave. Try something 15 times larger. Sure, you will die, but it would be one hell of a way to go.
I, on the other hand, like most denizens of NYC, will die parked on some highway, cursing Robert Moses for not building more.
89 posted on 08/09/2004 11:03:55 PM PDT by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: xp38
I'm thinking the wave from Deep Impact would be a better model.
90 posted on 08/09/2004 11:04:50 PM PDT by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

For sure; the Bush administration is using this to get his poll numbers up and postpone the election in November.


91 posted on 08/09/2004 11:07:58 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

I've gotta go - I need to save the wild ponies on Assateaque Island!


92 posted on 08/09/2004 11:08:49 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman

(tee-hee) and how's Cuba going to fare? (tee-hee)


93 posted on 08/09/2004 11:09:53 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

"...women and minorities hardest hit."


94 posted on 08/09/2004 11:10:00 PM PDT by Redcloak (Kids, drugs are bad. Mmmkay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sc2_ct

Does this mean Pittsburgh will be the new Miami of America?


95 posted on 08/09/2004 11:13:09 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Ok, and he won't tell us til after the election.


96 posted on 08/09/2004 11:16:26 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

I saw a tv program about this hypothetical disaster. Last year sometime, maybe on Discovery channel? Fascinating show. Not sure their science is what it should be, though.


97 posted on 08/09/2004 11:24:11 PM PDT by Graymatter (Countdown---85 more days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

I missed that one too but I did see When Worlds Collide and Crack in the World as a kid so I got my apocalyptic dosage while young.


98 posted on 08/09/2004 11:43:59 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

And from the west

Scientists closely monitoring Yellowstone. 200 degree ground temperatures reported.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1050165/posts

Sodom and Gomorrah Rediscovered
http://www.bibleplus.org/discoveries/sodomfound.htm


99 posted on 08/10/2004 12:16:35 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
By rough estimate, NY is about twice as far from the Canaries as London.

The difference is that when the wave hits the shore in England -- it will ravage the south-western coast (remember the western most part of Portugal and Spain would protect England to a large extent.

Lisbon may be hit, but if the landslide pushs waves out west from the islands they may not affect Europe too much at all. It would hit the Atlantic islands first.
100 posted on 08/10/2004 2:27:22 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson