Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell Won't Attend Republican Convention [AP thinks there's something significant about it]
AP ^ | August 10, 2004 | BARRY SCHWEID

Posted on 08/10/2004 10:57:04 AM PDT by ejdrapes

Powell Won't Attend Republican Convention

WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican centrist who is popular with moderate voters, intends to skip the GOP convention in New York that will nominate President Bush for a second term.

"The secretary does not plan to attend," State Department deputy spokesman Adam Ereli said Tuesday. He drew attention to Powell's remarks last week at a convention of minority journalists that he was obliged as secretary not to take part in "parochial debate."

The Republicans gather for the four-day convention beginning Aug. 30.

With Bush in a close race against Democratic nominee John Kerry Powell's stature with both Republicans and Democrats who favor a cautious approach to world problems could be an asset to the president.

In fact, Powell has defended Bush's foreign policy in interviews and speeches, dismissing Kerry's assertions that the president is inclined to go it alone in dangerous overseas ventures and favors pre-emptive action.

Kerry has placed special emphasis on consulting with allies and other foreign governments. He has faulted Bush on the war with Iraq, saying the president's approach alienated Arab and European governments.

In response, Powell told Unity: Journalists of Color Convention last Thursday that Bush took his advice to "not act unilaterally" and made the case against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein at the United Nations in September 2002.

Yet Powell also acknowledged, "The intelligence community apparently got it wrong on stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. I do not expect huge stockpiles to be found."

He said Bush officials knew that if "the United Nations ultimately did not act, and we didn't solve it diplomatically, we knew then that it might be necessary for us to solve it through the use of military force."

Powell's differences with Bush and his senior advisers who are more conservative occasionally is an issue. He favors abortion rights and affirmative action.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hatchact; powell; rncconvention
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Interesting that AP fails to mention that Condi and Rummy won't be at the convention either. Or that cabinet secretaries usually aren't part of the sitting President's re-election campaign. What's the point of this article other than implying Powell's not attending because he doesn't agree with Bush or doesn't want to see him be re-elected.
1 posted on 08/10/2004 10:57:06 AM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Maybe because he invited the UN to monitor the election--- hopefully that has made the GOP durn tootin' mad.

Maybe mad enough not to welcome people who are so eager to violate our sovereignty to please the global elites.


2 posted on 08/10/2004 10:59:33 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Deliberate misinformation.

Ah, there is no end to their hateful lies.

3 posted on 08/10/2004 11:01:13 AM PDT by OldFriend (WAR IS THE REMEDY OUR ENEMIES HAVE CHOSEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Apparently the AP, is just doing its bit for the Kerry campaign.


Way back....Well, you Decide.





Bush to Rumsfeld, Powell: Stay Out of the Campaign




US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld says President George W Bush has ordered him and Secretary of State Colin Powell to stay out of the US presidential campaign.
Appearing on the CBS Face the Nation program, Mr Rumsfeld said though he and Mr Powell may be drawn into discussions regarding US foreign policy and military issues before the November 2 face-off between Mr Bush and Democrat John Kerry, "We will be doing it in a manner that is not campaign-style at all".

"There won't be a role. The president has specifically asked Colin Powell and me not to be involved in the campaign," Mr Rumsfeld said.

"He thinks that it's best that the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defence tend to their responsibilities and not allow their departments to become enmeshed in the campaign."


4 posted on 08/10/2004 11:01:33 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes; hedgetrimmer

Powell, Rumsfeld and Rice will be ready to keep the war effort running should the enemy succedd in what they desperately want to do.


5 posted on 08/10/2004 11:02:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin ("A republic, if we can revive it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Also the fact that not the entire Executive Branch is present in the same place/time: not even at the State Of The Union Addresses. Ther are at least two Cabinet members absent, to ensure the succession of the office.

Rumsfeld, as SecDEF, and Colon Bowell as SecSTATE, would be absent. Rice is Nat'l Security Advisor, and NOT Cabinet, so she could be present.


6 posted on 08/10/2004 11:02:44 AM PDT by Old Sarge (My military service is honorable - whether you agree or not...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

I see it as a security measure.

Looks who's not attending:

Sec of State

Sec of Defense

and National Security Advisor

Actually, not to be a tin foil hat type, but I think it's a little worrisome, as far as a possible terror threat for the convention.

Obviously, Bush and Cheney have to be there (at least for one night) so if you're expecting a terror incident, which cabinet members would you not want to be there...the three they've named.

Just my 2 cents.


7 posted on 08/10/2004 11:03:43 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Transcript
8 posted on 08/10/2004 11:04:05 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Let's see, the last sitting President to run for re-election was Clinton in 1996. His SoS was Warren Christopher. Warren Christopher did not attend the 1996 DNC. What did AP report about it 8 Years ago?


9 posted on 08/10/2004 11:10:17 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Powell, Rumsfeld and Rice will be ready to keep the war effort running should the enemy succedd in what they desperately want to do.

Exactly. It would be beyond stupid to have the President, Vice-President & Secretary of State in NY City at the same time...especially during the convention with the whackos on the street.

The AP still thinks terrorism is a political joke perpetuated by the VRWC.

10 posted on 08/10/2004 11:11:36 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Agreed.


11 posted on 08/10/2004 11:12:45 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

International Monitoring of US Election Called 'Frightening'


12 posted on 08/10/2004 11:15:13 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
AP, please name one "black" cabinet level appointee in the Clinton administration. Exactly, so shut your pie-hole regarding the Bush Administration and their "black" appointees.
13 posted on 08/10/2004 11:15:40 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Interesting that AP fails to mention that Condi and Rummy won't be at the convention either. Or that cabinet secretaries usually aren't part of the sitting President's re-election campaign. What's the point of this article other than implying Powell's not attending because he doesn't agree with Bush or doesn't want to see him be re-elected.

Good point.

14 posted on 08/10/2004 11:18:16 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Yes, I thought succession immediately. But the media "knows" the threat is all a political ploy, so what the heck, why not try to make a little political hay out of this?


15 posted on 08/10/2004 11:18:21 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: livius
Good grief...even Drudge has this up on his site. Is he that stupid to fall for this crap?
16 posted on 08/10/2004 11:23:27 AM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: livius

Kerry didn't have his "presumptive" SoS Sandy Berger at his convention himself.


17 posted on 08/10/2004 11:24:14 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Kerry: how can we trust him with our money, if Teresa won't trust him with hers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Incidentally, I will not be attending the RNC either.
18 posted on 08/10/2004 11:39:46 AM PDT by Radix (I would like to thank everyone here for playing this home version of Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

contrary to popular belief, i do not even think powell is a repub. if he is repub he is too moderate, no repub belives in affirmative action.


19 posted on 08/10/2004 11:43:39 AM PDT by erik22lax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

BINGO!


20 posted on 08/10/2004 11:45:37 AM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson