Posted on 08/11/2004 4:13:13 PM PDT by AVNevis
And use the spell check...It makes me look smarter. HA!! It will do it for you too..!!
FRegards,
Your point being that even some liberals (such as your good self) are ignorant, you apparently never having heard of flavored condoms?
Of course, your self-absorbed ignorance makes the whole idea hilarious, right? Of course.
"And when you get older"...
If this "Eighth Grader" gets any older he/she will be on Social Security.
thanks for posting this thread.
good job.
So, taking a poster at face value when he (or she) reports something they experienced? You call this "propaganda?" Yet again, you libs are true to form. Resorting to name calling when you can add nothing of substance.
Checked out DU recently and all of the conspiracy theories they subscribe to? And, by default, you subscribe to also? Or, perhaps the correct title should be "leftwing propaganda."
And, if you have not read the newspapers out here recently, there was a school board trying to decide about "gender stereotyping" and "gender indentification" policies that were being promoted by a school district. The idea that someone from PP would be teaching such a class is more likely than not here in CA.
Oh no, I've certainly heard of them. It just seems a little far-fetched that a sex education teacher, even one pushing a (poorly) hidden agenda, would tell eighth grade students to use flavored condoms to make oral sex more enjoyable. Don't you agree?
Cheers.
"flavored condoms".....
are not the only suckers in evidence here.
So, taking a poster at face value when he (or she) reports something they experienced is wrong? You call this "propaganda?"
Yet again, you libs are true to form. Resorting to name calling when you can add nothing of substance. Ann Coulter was right again, you libs are all the same.
Checked out DU recently and all of the conspiracy theories they subscribe to? And, by default, you subscribe to also? Or, perhaps the correct title should be "leftwing propaganda."
And, if you have not read the newspapers out here recently, there was a school board trying to decide about "gender stereotyping" and "gender indentification" policies that were being promoted by a school district.
The idea that someone from PP would be teaching such a sex ed class is more likely than not here in CA.
(geez, where is an editor when I need it, roling eyes in embarrassment for my first effort)
Dictionary? ;-)
Just kiddin' ya, kid - welcome aboard and good luck.
Looks like Latte Lib just choked to death on a latte-flavored condom.
He's dead, Jim!
"a latte-flavored condom"
Laddie, that's what happens when that "latte" is supersized.
Laddie, your the only liberal I have seen here
BTW, when you get around to the Conservative Club, there are thousands of us around here who'd be happy to help. When the time comes, post a thread. :)
I was interested, and encouraged, to see that you're thinking of starting a Conservative Club at your high school. Ah, I remember the days of the "Youth for McKinley Club" I was in -- OK, I'm not that old, though sometimes I feel like I am. But conservatism, or perhaps more accurately, the perception of conservatism, changed with Ronald Reagan. Prior to him, conservatism was generally perceived as anti-everything, or go-slow-ism. Maybe even "liberal-lite." So-called conservatives in the Nixon-Ford era (and that's really where I first became politically aware) so often agreed with the liberals on social issues, differing only in that they wished to implement "reforms" more slowly. Many "conservatives" of that era pushed for slightly lower and/or slightly less progressive taxes, as opposed to a true flat tax; they supported a reduction in the rate of increasing government regulations and the attendant bureaucracy, but not an actual rollback of government; they supported judicial activism, only to a somewhat lesser extent did the liberals; and so on. In other words, they (the so-called "conservatives" of the era) were timid.
When you get your Conservative Club organized, my advice (unsolicited, granted) would be that the club have as its founding principal being for issues, as opposed to being simply naysayers. It's easier, and more popularly acceptable, to have a positive agenda. Seize the initiative, and get people talking. Everyone won't agree with your issues, of course, but you may be surprised at how many do.
If I had FR when I was in 8th grade, I wouldn't have hung out with those stupid hippies at the time:)
A 14 year old talking about sex here, is not really on topic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.