Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Out of Spotlight, Bush Overhauls U.S. Regulations (Liberals Incensed At Bush43 Regulatory Reforms)!
NY Times ^ | August 14, 2004 | JOEL BRINKLEY

Posted on 08/13/2004 7:52:22 PM PDT by Southack

Out of Spotlight, Bush Overhauls U.S. Regulations

By JOEL BRINKLEY

Published: August 14, 2004

WASHINGTON, Aug. 13 - April 21 was an unusually violent day in Iraq; 68 people died in a car bombing in Basra, among them 23 children. As the news went from bad to worse, President Bush took a tough line, vowing to a group of journalists, "We're not going to cut and run while I'm in the Oval Office."

On the same day, deep within the turgid pages of the Federal Register, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published a regulation that would forbid the public release of some data relating to unsafe motor vehicles, saying that publicizing the information would cause "substantial competitive harm" to manufacturers.

As soon as the rule was published, consumer groups yelped in complaint, while the government responded that it was trying to balance the interests of consumers with the competitive needs of business. But hardly anyone else noticed, and that was hardly an isolated case.

Allies and critics of the Bush administration agree that the Sept. 11 attacks, the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq have preoccupied the public, overshadowing an important element of the president's agenda: new regulatory initiatives. Health rules, environmental regulations, energy initiatives, worker-safety standards and product-safety disclosure policies have been modified in ways that often please business and industry leaders while dismaying interest groups representing consumers, workers, drivers, medical patients, the elderly and many others.

And most of it was done through regulation, not law - lowering the profile of the actions. The administration can write or revise regulations largely on its own, while Congress must pass laws. For that reason, most modern-day presidents have pursued much of their agendas through regulation. But administration officials acknowledge that Mr. Bush has been particularly aggressive in using this strategy.

"There's been more federal regulations, more regulatory notices, than previous administrations," said Trent Duffy, a White House spokesman, though he attributed much of that to the new rules dealing with domestic security.

Scott McClellan, the chief White House spokesman, said of the changes, "The president's common-sense policies reflect the values of America, whether it is cracking down on corporate wrongdoing or eliminating burdensome regulations to create jobs."

Some leaders of advocacy groups argue that the public preoccupation with war and terrorism has allowed the administration to push through changes that otherwise would have provoked an outcry. Carl Pope, the executive director of the Sierra Club, says he does not think the administration could have succeeded in rewriting so many environmental rules, for example, if the public's attention had not been focused on national security issues.

"The effect of the administration's concentration on war and terror has been to prevent the public from focusing on these issues," Mr. Pope said. "Now, when I hold focus groups with the general public and tell them what has been done, they exclaim, 'How could this have happened without me knowing about it?' "

The administration has often been stymied in its efforts to pass major domestic initiatives in Congress. Even when both houses have been under Republican control, Senate Democrats, using parliamentary rules, have been able to block legislation eagerly sought by the White House and business groups, including bills on energy, bankruptcy and medical malpractice. So officials have turned to regulatory change.

Chad Colton, a spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget, which approves all new regulations, defends the administration's handling of new rules, saying: "The process is very open, very transparent. Some regulations we post get hundreds of comments, even thousands." Mr. Colton acknowledged that most comments came from industry or from public interest groups. "But those groups represent consumers."

Clarence Ditlow, who directs one of those public interest groups, the Center for Auto Safety, said: "People in my line of work are frustrated. We try to work harder. But the amount of media attention and public attention to consumer issues has gone way, way down since 9/11."

Stuart M. Butler, senior domestic policy analyst for the conservative Heritage Foundation, while agreeing that the wars "push a lot of other issues off the page, literally and figuratively," said, "It cuts both ways." The White House "also can't get traction on issues they care about, like Social Security reform, because of all the noise from the war in Iraq."



Continued
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next>>


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; business; omb; reform; regulations; stealthpresident
The liberals' hatred of President Bush's pro-business regulatory reform is quite evident in this article.
1 posted on 08/13/2004 7:52:23 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Southack

Well, if only the liberals could win elections they wouldn't have to whine like this.


2 posted on 08/13/2004 7:57:00 PM PDT by kcar (www.TheUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

"Senate Democrats, using parliamentary rules, have been able to block legislation eagerly sought by the White House and business groups"

Yep, that's what I call unbiased news...


3 posted on 08/13/2004 8:00:34 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Then I guess it's settled. Bush is an evil mastermind using terrorism as cover for his plan to rule the world.


4 posted on 08/13/2004 8:02:03 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Just wait. The bias grows stronger as you read further into the article.

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

5 posted on 08/13/2004 8:02:27 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Sorry NYT."The Business of this Country is Business"-Calvin Coolidge 28th President of the United States.


6 posted on 08/13/2004 8:08:18 PM PDT by Jan Hus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

7 posted on 08/13/2004 8:08:25 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Figures. I don't know if I really want to read any further.
Actually, I don't.


8 posted on 08/13/2004 8:08:44 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack

They make it sound so sinister.


9 posted on 08/13/2004 8:09:18 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er ( Election day: FOUR Supreme Court Justices! Enough said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
The writer brags about stopping domestic U.S. oil drilling in Wyoming, among other things. Pretty sad.

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

10 posted on 08/13/2004 8:09:55 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Southack

"Darn those pesky terrorists, interrupting our agenda!" Morons.


11 posted on 08/13/2004 8:11:29 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (I'll put George W. Bush's four years in office over Kerry's four months in Vietnam any time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack

If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.


12 posted on 08/13/2004 8:12:51 PM PDT by arjay ("Are we a government that has a country, or a country that has a government?" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arjay; Grampa Dave; JohnHuang2
"If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America."

That's 100%, Grade A, top-notch tag line material. Congrats!

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

13 posted on 08/13/2004 8:14:08 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southack
On the same day, deep within the turgid pages of the Federal Register, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published a regulation that would forbid the public release of some data relating to unsafe motor vehicles, saying that publicizing the information would cause "substantial competitive harm" to manufacturers.

If this is true, why is this a good thing ?
14 posted on 08/13/2004 8:40:17 PM PDT by stylin19a (We gotta get out of this place...if it's the last thing we ever do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a; Willie Green
"If this is true, why is this a good thing ?"

Keep in mind that the Transportation Department has always and still has access to that data.

Publicizing that data, however, was simply giving trial lawyers free ammo and research so that they could continue to drive our manufacturers overseas out of their reach by getting enormous lawsuit verdicts.

President Bush stopped that nonsense, at least in so far as handing the trial lawyers official government data with which to win such cases...

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

15 posted on 08/13/2004 8:45:03 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Southack

You are welcome to use it. Thanks.


16 posted on 08/13/2004 9:51:54 PM PDT by arjay ("Are we a government that has a country, or a country that has a government?" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Southack; Miss Marple

Our stealth president strikes again.

While the semi conscious mediots write their hate GW articles, he and his team without any fan fare do their job.

If they were real reporters instead of lying flacks, they wouldn't keep ending up surprised and with rotten egg on their faces.


17 posted on 08/13/2004 11:27:48 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (I'm a donor to the Swift Boat Vets fund. Have you donated? If not please do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arjay; Southack
If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.

Bravo Zulu! This is great tagline material.

18 posted on 08/13/2004 11:30:33 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (I'm a donor to the Swift Boat Vets fund. Have you donated? If not please do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson