Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trumpeting Military Officers' Support
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | August 19, 2004 | Joseph L. Galloway

Posted on 08/20/2004 1:03:25 PM PDT by Former Military Chick

In the good old days of the 20th century, generals and admirals for the most part steered clear of politics and politicians and political parties. Many of them as a matter of principle wouldn't even vote in the elections of the country they defended.

Until Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower decided to seek the presidency, no one even knew whether he was a Republican or a Democrat.

Some say that they date the change in flag officer attitudes toward politics to Eisenhower's reorganization and cutback in the Army in the late 1950s. Two respected generals, Matthew Ridgeway and James Gavin, resigned in protest and spoke out against the Pentomic Army, another flawed experiment with the institution.

A cluster of five Civil War officers won the presidency after their war – Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, James A. Garfield, Chester A. Arthur and Benjamin Harrison. Three others – George McClellan, Winfield Scott and Winfield Scott Hancock – won nominations but lost their elections.

Only one general, Eisenhower, won the office in the 20th century. Two others, Leonard Wood and Douglas MacArthur, widely advertised their availability, but no one came calling. Many believed Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf and his boss in the Gulf War, Gen. Colin Powell, would seek the office. Neither did, and some say that the country might have been better off if even one of them had.

Standing up, saying your piece and running for office is the right of all Americans, including retired generals and admirals. And we can only wish that more who wear stars would resign in protest when their civilian political masters get things wrong, and go public with their arguments against the kind of folly that costs soldiers their lives.

What is unseemly and undignified is the way both political parties are trotting out their four-star supporters in this election season. The Democrats put a dozen generals and admirals on the podium at their convention, backing Sen. John Kerry. The Republicans say they will bring out a hundred retired flag officers to back the re-election of President Bush.

Shame on the parties for using the retired officers in this fashion; shame on the retired officers for letting themselves be so used.

There is a worry that this unseemly display sends a message to those still wearing the uniform on active duty that it is all right to be political, to declare for a party and a candidate, when it is not. That the polarization and division of the country may infect the institution that defends it.

Participating in such a political spectacle further diminishes what respect the public still has for its retired generals and admirals – what respect survives after watching many of them walk out of the Pentagon and straight onto the boards of defense industries. The worst of them, the Beltway Bandits, pimp their friends still on active duty for this or that weapons system or aircraft or aircraft carrier.

For the sake of the country and the sake of their profession, the retired generals and admirals ought to steer clear of endorsing parties and candidates. Speak out on defense issues? You bet. Vote in November? Sure.

March and strut for the political hacks? No way.

Galloway is the senior military correspondent for Knight Ridder Newspapers and co-author of the national best-seller "We Were Soldiers Once ... and Young."


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: endorsements; kerry; militaryofficers; presidents

1 posted on 08/20/2004 1:03:25 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Galloway ping.


2 posted on 08/20/2004 1:18:40 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (When it came to Intelligence, Kerry was absent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Galloway is the senior military correspondent for Knight Ridder Newspapers and co-author of the national best-seller "We Were Soldiers Once ... and Young." Galloway is wrong on this. For better or worse, we have a large military, and after they retire, a certain percentage will be fit for political careers, just as some become teachers and some become golfers :)
3 posted on 08/20/2004 1:24:05 PM PDT by Ace's Dad ("There are more important things: Friendship, Bravery...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chieftain; Ragtime Cowgirl; gatorbait; writer33; GreyFriar; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; ...

Agree or disagree he does make some excellent points.


4 posted on 08/20/2004 2:03:48 PM PDT by Former Military Chick (I previously posted under Military Chick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Standing up, saying your piece and running for office is the right of all Americans.

When using this phrase, shouldn't it be spelled "say your peace," and not "say your piece?" Do I have that wrong?

5 posted on 08/20/2004 2:12:04 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

BUMP FOR SUPPORT SWIFTVETS AD 2... http://swift2.he.net/~swift2/sellout.mpg


6 posted on 08/20/2004 2:17:38 PM PDT by freddiedavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

If Mr. Galloway is really worried about the loss of respect for former flag officers, I think he should focus on those who become TV analysts -- not on those who endorse political candidates. A lot of them said some pretty silly things during the invasion of Iraq.

Of course, I don't think Mr. Galloway is worried about the respect level for these former officers -- I think he has other concerns on his mind. (I think he doesn't want voters to know about the huge support for the president by those who have served in uniform.)


7 posted on 08/20/2004 2:18:28 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

You have brought up excellent points, thank you. I must tell you, I worry who will be CIC in 15 years. So few in Congress have served.

They are so good at offering their opinion but have they actually been on the front.

Retired officers can offer their thoughts. I really do not know how much folks put into their words though.


8 posted on 08/20/2004 2:30:44 PM PDT by Former Military Chick (I previously posted under Military Chick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Of all the things I worry about for the future of our country, I don't worry about lack of military experience of future presidents. I think our history has shown that presidents without extensive wartime experience can be some of our best, even in times of war -- like Lincoln, and Reagan, and the wartime policies (not domestic policies) of Roosevelt.

Maybe our worst wartime president was LBJ. He had combat experience, and it made him think he was qualified to do tactical target selection from the White House. Big mistake.


9 posted on 08/20/2004 2:48:37 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
LBJ had no real war-time experience. He was a Congressman during WWII, and "volunteered" ... went out to the Pacific, rode a plane on a nominal mission, and came back with a Silver Star.

Later, Pres. Roosevelt insisted that all Congressmen and Senators who were doing the same - go inactive, and return to Congress to do the necessary business of Congress.

LBJ's artificial Silver Star was probably allowed to curry favor (Gen. MacArthur endorsed it). LBJ was an observer, and the only one on the plane that got the award.

So LBJ's military experience was similar to much of his other life - FRAUDULENT!! (He was probably instrumental in the fraudulant 1960 election where Texas - which was expected to go solid for Nixon, ended up in JFK's column after some strange behind-the-door dealings at various polling places.)

Mike

10 posted on 08/20/2004 2:55:35 PM PDT by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vineyard

I've heard that his Silver Star was "controversial," but I don't know anything more than that. I guess it just goes to show that simply because someone has a combat medal like a Silver Star, it doesn't mean they'll be good (or even competent) as a president.


11 posted on 08/20/2004 3:01:34 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Freeper N. Theknow says:
"It’s faster than a checkbook, more powerful than a Democratic demagogue, able to lay waste to a liar Kerry with the single click of a mouse. It's a little bird of truth, it's plain to see Kerry's unfit... it's... it's...SuperFReep!

Want to join in the fun? Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!

12 posted on 08/21/2004 10:53:22 AM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
I remember my husband telling how he had all his family vote for Eisenhower. He was military career WWII. They were N.C.Dem's, mountaineers. The military vote sure makes a difference.
13 posted on 08/26/2004 7:28:14 AM PDT by americanmother (Thessalonians chapter 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ace's Dad
a certain percentage will be fit for political careers, just as some become teachers and some become golfers :)

I knew a retiring Army O-5 who used VA benefits to go to golf pro school.

14 posted on 08/26/2004 8:02:48 AM PDT by jimfree (Beware the unexpected results of your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson