Posted on 08/22/2004 11:27:26 AM PDT by kattracks
Author and Vietnam historian B. G. Burkett tells NewsMax in an exclusive interview that Senator John Kerry is mired in a quagmire worse than the one he complained about in Vietnam.The controversy may just cost him the presidency, Burkett says. “Kerry keeps losing points every day this controversy wears on in the media,” Burkett told NewsMax shortly before Kerry’s campaign filed a legal complaint with the FEC to stop the Swift Boat Veterans ads. A sign of desperation?
Burkett is no stranger to such controversy and measures. He has been sued multiple times after exposing phony military records of Vietnam veterans – many of whom never even served in Vietnam.
Burkett’s book “Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of Its Heroes and Its History” (Verity Press) was published in 1998 and has become a must read for those who want to unlock the truth about Vietnam and its aftermath.
In fact, Burkett’s book has been credited in being among the first to question John Kerry’s war record. Burkett has interviewed and spoken with many of the Swift Boaters who served with Kerry and his commanding officers.
Kerry Responds
As Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth keep ramming away at John Kerry’s carefully crafted hero image, the beleaguered candidate has finally turned to a media blitz of his own.
In his new TV ad Kerry defends his actions that led to him receiving the Bronze Star.
The ad features Jim Rassmann, one of his loyal dozen “band of brothers,” certifying Kerry’s bravery under fire as the future senator from Massachusetts and presidential candidate pulled him from the water under withering fire after a couple of mines exploded during a South Vietnam river operation.
Or was it just one mine that exploded? And were there small arms sweeping the area as well as the after-action reports claimed?
The Swift Boat vets that criticize Kerry say only one mine exploded under a boat not commanded by Kerry and there was no accompanying enemy fire.
How did Green Beret Rassmann fall off Kerry’s boat only to be rescued from the drink by Kerry? Burkett says witnesses attest that Rassmann fell off Kerry’s boat because Kerry engaged the boat in a frantic maneuver to flee from away from the action around the exploding mine.
Preponderance of Evidence
What will settle the controversy? NewsMax asks the author.
“They [the Swift boat group] will go away only if Kerry announces he has removed himself from the race,” replies a cynical Burkett, who has been making a study of the growing controversy that has dominated the TV talk shows and radio pundits.
Although Burkett feels that the fog of war may forever keep the real truth from emerging from the smoke, he does believe that the vet group is moving ahead in establishing its less flattering version of the Kerry exploits by “a preponderance of the evidence.”
“These Swift Boats moved in squadrons and formations,” explains Burkett. “Sometimes the better vantage point for observing the action was from another boat.”
And John O’Neil, co-author of the bestseller “Unfit for Command” has interviewed these other observers, taking dispute with the so-called “after-action” reports filed by Lt. (j.g.) Kerry.
These reports later provided the basis for Kerry’s now much celebrated Silver Star, Bronze Star and three Purple Heart decorations – all earned in an abbreviated and bigger than life four month stint in-country.
“The people up the chain of command assumed that none of their officers would cheat,” opines Burkett.
“It’s a back and forth catfight” says Burkett, who thinks that the tide may break dramatically to the side of the disaffected vets if one of the loyal Kerry band of brothers turns colors.
How likely is that? asks NewsMax.
“Well, they [Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth] keep hoping,” says Burkett. But if O’Neil has done his homework so has Kerry, he explains. “Kerry long ago called all his men together to settle on one version of the action.”
Other critics say that Kerry’s campaign has already put on the payroll one or more of his “band of brothers.”
Veteran Steve Gardner, however, is one of the Kerry crew members who has never gone along with the Kerry program: “I watched him put his crew in jeopardy, his indecisive moves…”
So why was Gardner so singular? asks NewsMax.
“You have to realize that Gardner was an unusual member of the crew,” explains the author. “Gardner had a previous tour of duty on Swift Boats. He knew the right way to confront the enemy – not the Kerry way [steering to open water].”
Kerry’s Navy More Like McHale’s
Burkett goes on to explain that a stalwart, chance-taking Kerry would be contrary to the historic Kerry, who he describes as “always belly-aching and whining about how the admirals had decided to send the Swift Boats up those dangerous jungle-clogged rivers.”
According to Burkett, Kerry had volunteered with the notion that his tour was going to be a sort of gentlemanly duty of offshore coast-watching – not close combat with an enemy lurking on the shores.
Burkett has suggested in the past that the way out of the dilemma for Kerry would be for Kerry to open up all his files by executing a blanket SF-180 form allowing all the press to have independent access to his file.
Burkett, however, says the release of Kerry’s full file, which he does not believe has taken place despite Kerry’s claims otherwise, will still not stop the Swift Boat Vets who are opposed to Kerry.
“It would have some bearing to the press, but it’s not going to deter this group,” says Burkett.
“And remember,” adds Burkett, “this is not a bunch of Republicans going after Kerry. If Kerry were running as a Republican, the attacks would be just the same.”
Burkett himself has criticized President Bush for his National Guard duty during the Vietnam War.
Just how worried is the Kerry camp?
“You bet they are worried,” says Burkett. “This election may just turn on those five percent undecided out there. The bottom line is simple -- the longer the dispute wears on, the more Kerry loses. They’re never going to resolve this dispute.”
I-i-i-i-i-i like it. Quagmire it is.
rack it!
Here comes Hitlery
BTTT for Jug Burkett, a Vietnam veteran who has done more than anyone else to cut through the lies and get the truth out there.
I met Burkett when he was selling his book all by himself. Heck of a guy!
Pundits keep saying it's the negative ads and "hard to prove truths" that are hurting Kerry. In all actuality, it is the fact that he illegally visited VC leaders in Paris to engage in secret and treasonous negotiations, he campaigned to lose the war on lies and slander against our fighting troops, and he continued to negate reasonable efforts to establish global military superiority and homeland security by standing against missile defense.
Kerry's public, admitted record is only reinforced by the rumors and complaints we no hear made by honorable and highly decorated peers who served in similar capacities to Kerry.
Kerry opposed the war with unscrupulous means and came home to continue undermining our defense establishment. Finally, he has continually attacked a sitting president for partisan reasons.
Kerry and his foreign-born wife have proven that they are not fit to occupy our whitehouse.
The particulars of his four month "stint" on the swift boats are interesting, but his polling values are falling because people have realized that he can't command our military.
How can any historian ignore statements like Kerry's made?
"In an interview on NBC's "Meet The Press" last Sunday, Kerry was asked about statements he made about Vietnam War atrocities during an interview with the same program in 1971, when he was a leader in the antiwar movement:"
"There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed, in that I took part in shootings in free-fire zones, I conducted harassment and interdiction fire, I used .50-caliber machine guns which were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search-and-destroy missions, in the burning of villages," Kerry said in 1971.
Excerpt from CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/25/hughes.kerry.vietnam/
Harder! Harder!
Want to join in the fun? Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!
I'm enjoying this so much more than I should be.
BUMP FOR THE SUPPORT OF SWIFT VETS HERE... http://www.swiftvets.com/
with Dole joining the fray, more and more of the sheep will start doubting the media line: this translates to a loss of prestige and power by the big media. they will not allow that to happen at some point, and watch them start to turn on kerry (newsweek looks like they just went against kerry w/ the bronze star story for example)
Can Hillary legally step in if Kerry has to pull out?
Is Edwards hiding so he can step up if Kerry blows his lid in the near future?
Not that Kerry would go lightly, he's built his life around running for the presidency....
If Kerry stays and gets blown out in Nov., the Dems would most likely lose seats in other races as well.
There are so many interesting angles of this situation to think about.
"Hemorrhaging?" Don't you think that's a bit overstated?
If the talk turns instead to Kerry's Senate record, he would be losing public support at an even faster rate. This guy is a loser, and the Democratic party is a mess for having gone with him.
Could a sitting Senator be imprisoned for crimes commited while in the military? Did they ever actually put Benedict Arnold in prison or did he excape first?
As a swing voter, I can no longer consider voting for Kerry without first seeing and evaluating what he is hiding. I'm sorry John, but I think you are lying!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
