Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement by Gov. Marc Racicot (On legal action against ACT, Media Fund, and Moveon.org)
George W. Bush ^ | August 26, 2004

Posted on 08/27/2004 1:41:27 PM PDT by RWR8189

ARLINGTON, VA – Bush-Cheney '04 Campaign Chairman Gov. Marc Racicot today issued the following statement:

"Federal law requires that all organizations working for the election or defeat of a federal candidate operate under the same standards and rules. On March 31, 2004, Bush-Cheney '04 and the RNC filed a complaint against the Media Fund, ACT, MoveOn.org and other organizations for failing to operate under these rules. These organizations have now spent over $85 million in advertisements and other political activity to defeat President Bush, but they have refused to abide by the fundraising and spending limits. We have asked the FEC to enforce the law and require these organizations to operate under federal election standards for fundraising and spending.

"While the FEC agreed that these organizations should operate under the law, they refused to apply this law until after the 2004 election was over. Because 120 days have passed since we asked the FEC to apply the law to these organizations, and the FEC has failed to act, we will file suit in federal court to compel the FEC to take action to regulate these organizations as the federal political committees that they are. Our goal is a level playing field - all organizations working for the election or defeat of federal candidates should operate under the same standards and rules."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 527; 527s; act; bc04; bush43; campaignfinance; cfr; fec; gop; gwb2004; kerry; mediafund; moveon; racicot; reform; rnc

1 posted on 08/27/2004 1:41:28 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
they refused to apply this law until after the 2004 election was over.
2 posted on 08/27/2004 1:45:18 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

And this will work, because....?


3 posted on 08/27/2004 1:45:38 PM PDT by Old Sarge (ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

I am with you; what IS the point of this, politically speaking


4 posted on 08/27/2004 1:47:01 PM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

My point was:

...does the RNC really think they can make a legal point stick to The Left? The Left OWNS the courts - and the GOP just gave another reason for them to laugh in their latte's.


5 posted on 08/27/2004 1:54:21 PM PDT by Old Sarge (ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
Here's a thought: The case either achieves enforcement of CFR, or it moves up to the Supremes to be judged unconstitutional.
6 posted on 08/27/2004 1:55:43 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Racicot should leave this alone -- the whiner constituency is already voting for Kerry.


7 posted on 08/27/2004 1:56:20 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

What I heard on television last night from a GOP official, but isn't in this letter, is that there is concern that there is a coordinated fund raising effort underway by the DNC groups connected to the 527's.

Unstated, but my concern, is that there is foreign money pouring into these groups, ala Chinese fund-raising during the Clinton-Gore years.


8 posted on 08/27/2004 1:56:51 PM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

And you suggest, what....?


9 posted on 08/27/2004 1:58:17 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
I am with you; what IS the point of this, politically speaking

Bush is quietly taking the wind out of Kerry's sails on telling the President to stop the Swift Boat ads. He knows that no court can act on this suit in time to make a difference.

Additionally, it enables the Bush campaign to show up what a hypocrite Kerry is in demanding that only the Swift Boat ads be dropped and not those that smeared Bush's national guard service, etc. When Kerry whines again, which he will, Bush will, once again, say "join me in stopping all of these ads." Kerry will ignore the call after which Bush will say "we are trying to do something about what you are just complaining about."

At some point this situation will presented as another Kerry "flip flop" and an extremely self-serving move, and a very hypocritical, feckless one, at that.
10 posted on 08/27/2004 2:05:56 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lucky Dog
TO: Lucky Dog
FROM: Baredog

Bush is quietly taking the wind out of Kerry's sails on telling the President to stop the Swift Boat ads

I think you've nailed it, they even have McCain in on the act, ain't it great.

IMHO the Swifties have just begun to kick the s**t out of Lurch, after all, he did say "bring it on". LOL

11 posted on 08/27/2004 2:13:04 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
...all, he did say "bring it on".

I just hope they keep "bringing more and more of it on."
12 posted on 08/27/2004 2:19:02 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
IMHO the Swifties have just begun to kick the s**t out of Lurch, after all, he did say "bring it on".

There is an interesting note in NRO's Corner, posted by Rich Lowry, to the effect that one Vietnam Veteran has stated that if Kerry loses, "it will be the parade we never had." I quite liked the thought.

13 posted on 08/27/2004 2:47:59 PM PDT by aBootes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The media yesterday said that in response to McCain's request to do something about SwiftBoats, Bush promised to take action against 527 organizations illegally coordinating with candidates.

I assume this is the response. Good.


14 posted on 08/27/2004 3:13:03 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

but they have refused to abide by the fundraising and spending

Anyone know anything about these limits?

15 posted on 08/27/2004 4:34:00 PM PDT by GretchenM (A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Win the case and make the contributions taxable. That would honk off the RATs.


16 posted on 08/27/2004 5:30:53 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye ((Kerry is a flake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aBootes
one Vietnam Veteran has stated that when if Kerry loses, "it will be the parade we never had." I quite liked the thought.

Me too, I just made a small correction. LOL

17 posted on 08/27/2004 5:48:49 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Ben Ginsberg said that the SBVT are operating according to current law. I don't understand this legal action by B-C, if it also includes SBVT.


18 posted on 08/27/2004 5:57:14 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson