Skip to comments.
Shadowy Addiction:
Cyberporn Is Having Damaging Effects on Users Who Can't Stop Clicking
ABC News ^
| 8-27-04
| Lynn Sherr
Posted on 08/30/2004 6:40:40 AM PDT by Caleb1411
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: Owl_Eagle
Wait... there's PORN??? On the INTERNET?!?!?!?I was as shocked as you. But I'm still not falling for that "Kerry was in Vietnam" rumor that's been going around...
41
posted on
08/30/2004 9:07:34 AM PDT
by
HenryLeeII
(sultan88, R.I.P.)
To: goldstategop
Porn IS male fantasy. Every man has wanted to make love to the most beautiful woman on earth and as long as women are around men will fantasize about the kind of women most of them can never have. And that is were porn comes in - especially the nude star pin-ups. It fulfills a male need. Sex does that much better. And these guys are choosing porn over intercourse with a woman. Any woman who is not positively grotesque is going to fulfill the male need a lot better than the prettiest collection of electrons.
To: Owl_Eagle
What's this thing I keep hearing about....this "Internet" thing?
Whatever it is, I bet it can't hold a candle to the sick, twisted visions running through my head right now.
I should try it though.....
43
posted on
08/30/2004 9:19:21 AM PDT
by
Don Simmons
(General Welfare doesn't mean you can generally stay on Welfare!)
To: Motherbear
44
posted on
08/30/2004 9:29:12 AM PDT
by
Quick1
To: Caleb1411
Next newsflash - Kerry Served in Viet Nam
45
posted on
08/30/2004 9:33:24 AM PDT
by
UsnDadof8
(World Leaders for Kerry - Saddam, Kim Jong Il, Aristide)
To: Don Simmons
What's this thing I keep hearing about....this "Internet" thing
Somebody told me they have it on computers now, or something. Maybe that'll help?
Owl_Eagle
”Guns Before Butter.”
46
posted on
08/30/2004 10:02:54 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
("Fire can be our servant, whether it's toasting S'mores or raining down on Charlie" –Principal Skinn)
To: Caleb1411
It says one click can ruin your life while talking about a guy clicking for 14 years. HELLO
47
posted on
08/30/2004 10:10:47 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(neither said any of them that aught of the things which he possessed was his own)
To: Motherbear
No, he just went to the pub for a flop with the local working girls. This is much ado about NOTHING. Protecting children from porn is of more concern. I could care less what adults do, or what "addictions" they have. Do we want a responsibility society or a nanny state?
48
posted on
08/30/2004 10:22:41 AM PDT
by
jayef
To: I still care
49
posted on
08/30/2004 10:25:47 AM PDT
by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: Petronski
50
posted on
08/30/2004 10:26:58 AM PDT
by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: MineralMan
None at all, thanksRight ....
51
posted on
08/30/2004 11:28:21 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
("Beer is proof that God loves us." --Benjamin Franklin)
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: Petronski
So that explains it, thanks
53
posted on
08/31/2004 3:11:50 PM PDT
by
al baby
(please only one screen name per person)
To: Quick1
"Liking porn will probably never be called a disease."
It depends on who gets appointed by who gets elected. The party of no personal responsibility has magical powers of twisternation; OK to kill your kids if you didn't plan them or that they may be inconvenient at this time, drug addiction is a disease and not the addicts sin, do not defend yourself or your loved ones for that is the job of the police, if you run out of food because you will not work the gov't will feed you...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson