Skip to comments.
Bush says war on terror will be won
Guardian ^
| Mark Oliver
Posted on 08/31/2004 10:55:04 AM PDT by arkady_renko
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
From the article:
Senator John Edwards, the Democratic vice-presidential candidate, said yesterday: "After months of listening to the Republicans base their campaign on their singular ability to win the war on terror, the president now says we can't win the war on terrorism."
To: arkady_renko
Democrats are too stupid to realize that terrorism is going to be with us until the end of time; the only way to "win" is to keep fighting.
That being said, I'd love to hear their "plan" to win the war on terrorism.
2
posted on
08/31/2004 11:01:16 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
So Kerry isn't the only one who flip-flops?
3
posted on
08/31/2004 11:08:13 AM PDT
by
adamk
To: adamk
Did Bush vote for it before he voted against it?
Did he say reporting for duty 30 years after saying that he was a war criminal?
Did he say that he was for the Vietnamese and then block the Senate vote to try to pressure Vietnam to cease human rights violation?
Is there going to be a little flag waved by the terrorists when they give up?
4
posted on
08/31/2004 11:10:46 AM PDT
by
saveliberty
(Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
To: arkady_renko
This is analogous to having some sort of roach infestation in your house. You can be sure youve killed them all, but theyll always be a threat you need to keep on top off. Bush will get the house tented and take the hurt to them; Kerry will put out some humane traps and hope they leave us alone.
To: arkady_renko
Mr. Edwards...it is YOUR side kick who is the flip flipping idjit...and ALL of America KNOWS what the message was in GW's declaration on winning a war "against terrorism"...BUT while you are busy ignoring your falling numbers, lousy running mate and messageless campaign we invite you to CONTINUE to harp on GW's words all the while you ignore the inconsistencies in your own party's race for the WH...
6
posted on
08/31/2004 11:11:36 AM PDT
by
antivenom
("Never argue with an idiot, he'll bring you down to his level - then beat you with experience.")
To: arkady_renko
Methinks Mr. Edwards is another victim of Bush "strategery." They try to capitalize on a gaffe, and in the end they just end up digging an even deeper hole for themselves. Makes me almost wonder if President Bush does this on purpose, knowing he's setting a trap.
7
posted on
08/31/2004 11:12:50 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: adamk; meowmeow; Constitution Day; 4mycountry; Poohbah; Grampa Dave; an amused spectator; ...
So Kerry isn't the only one who flip-flops? You sign up over a month ago, and this is the first comment you post?
You look an awful lot like a sleeper troll to me.
8
posted on
08/31/2004 11:13:41 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(I actually ignored this thread before I posted to it. jfk, 08/2004)
To: adamk
To: VRWCmember
Shame to waste a sleeper account on such a lamea** comment.
To: adamk
11
posted on
08/31/2004 11:16:46 AM PDT
by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: adamk
12
posted on
08/31/2004 11:17:17 AM PDT
by
glock rocks
(It's stuned, stuned in my memory.)
To: VRWCmember; adamk
smells trollish around here
13
posted on
08/31/2004 11:23:11 AM PDT
by
Laura Earl
(No rest for the wicked.)
To: adamk
Just...like...fishin...just...need...to...SET THE HOOK!
A_R
To: adamk; 4mycountry; TheBigB; VRWCmember; Zavien Doombringer; jriemer; mhking; glock rocks; ...
So Kerry isn't the only one who flip-flops? Ah! Your first post. Welcome to FreeRepublic.com .....
15
posted on
08/31/2004 11:25:06 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: Darksheare
16
posted on
08/31/2004 11:25:25 AM PDT
by
Laura Earl
(No rest for the wicked.)
To: adamk
Did we win the Cold War in 4 years?
Can we prevent all "lone nut" acts of terrorism in Bali, Israel, et al or do those not meet your consideration for "terrorism" or things to tackle in "the war on terror"?
Or do you just like getting a Walter Cranky-like soundbite of President Bush saying that the war is "now unwinnable"? You do realize that Michael Moore is CHEERING for the other side to win in Iraq and denying that there is even any terrorism over there:
(April 14, 2004):The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not "insurgents" or "terrorists" or "The Enemy." They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow -- and they will win. Get it, Mr. Bush?....I oppose the U.N. or anyone else risking the lives of their citizens to extract us from our debacle...the majority of Americans supported this war once it began and, sadly, that majority must now sacrifice their children until enough blood has been let that maybe -- just maybe -- God and the Iraqi people will forgive us in the end.
17
posted on
08/31/2004 11:25:50 AM PDT
by
weegee
(YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
To: Howlin
Democrats are too stupid to realize that terrorism is going to be with us until the end of time; the only way to "win" is to keep fighting.Absolutely correct, 100%!
18
posted on
08/31/2004 11:26:01 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
To: adamk; fortunecookie; dighton; martin_fierro; cyborg
So Kerry isn't the only one who flip-flops? No. So does your mama. I found that out last night.
By the way, you might not recognize her next time you see her, I shaved her back.
19
posted on
08/31/2004 11:26:52 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Complacency is the enemy.)
To: arkady_renko
Kerry is going down in flames and you're over here arguing semantics. Smooth move ex-lax
20
posted on
08/31/2004 11:28:17 AM PDT
by
bad company
((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson